<Lauriat> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Scribe_List
scribe+
<Lauriat> TPAC Agenda and Surveys https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-silver/2022Sep/0009.html
Shawn: Main purpose of this meeting is to discuss presentations / surveys for TPAC
<Lauriat> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2022#AG_WG_Meeting_at_TPAC_2022
Shawn: The schedule is pacific
time, not Boston based, do adjust for your own timezone
... Monday there's a meeting with APA and COGA
... There are four surveys for next week, two for Monday, two
for Tuesday.
... Please take time to fill them out, they're pretty
short
... Equity is the first thing after lunch
... Each day ends with a working session
... Anyone from test types or equity who wants to talk through
their work?
Shadi: There are lots of details for Test types that we can go through
<Lauriat> Test Types PR Survey https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/test-types/
Shadi: What we're asking is if
the direction is a good one. Is it something we can continue
exploring
... I feel it's important to get the backing of the group if we
should continue experimenting
Shawn: The survey question, and
what described is the level I'd want to ask.
... This is very much in the works. This is a direction we
should build in.
... There are three different answers. 1. Is yes support, and
keep as exploratory, 2 is yes and to go to developing, and 3 is
no and suggest a direction.
<MichaelC> Equity PR
<MichaelC> proposed Equity section
Michael: There is a pull request for equity. We don't have auto-formatting for exploratory sections in the requirements yet. It will be.
<Lauriat> Equity PR Survey https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/equity-tpac/
Michael: it's put in the section
under Opportunities.
... We ended up dividing it in to three categories. Equity in
impact
... Equity in process, and then there is structural equity.
Things in the world, people disadvantaged for structural
reasons.
... I tried to focus the requirements mainly on impact and
process.
... The proposal is that we'd use more of an equity designed
process in the groups.
... There is some high-level stuff in the pull request as to
what that means, but in general that involves tracking how
improvements are happening.
... We should take up an equity centered process in some way,
and we should talk about that in TPAC.
... We don't have consensus that that's all we need, but that's
what in the pull request
Shawn: That's Monday, Tuesday then gets into Issue severity
<Lauriat> Issue Severity Survey https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/issue-severity-tpac/
Rachael: Just to highlight, this one has methods. They're not well labelled, they're not fully formatted
Shawn: The next thing on Tuesday's agenda is the accessibility support presentation
<Makoto> Accessibility Supported Subgroup Wiki https://github.com/w3c/silver/wiki/Accessibility-supported-Subgroup
<Lauriat> Accessibility Supported PR Survey https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/access-support-tpac/
Makoto: We need to discuss which
direction we should go. Keep the concept of accessibility
support, or remove it
... I'd like to ask participants, should we keep accessibility
support, or remove it?
... We have 5 options, and I'd like to discuss which you want
and why
... It would also be fruitful to go through the questions after
my presentation
Rachael: I think it's a fruitful conversation to discuss which options people would prefer and why
Shawn: I think breaking down those options helps immensely. We've had the higher level in-or-out discussion.
Makoto: My slides don't have the information about the directions yet. I'll add a slide which show the options
Shawn: The second half of Tuesday we have the conformance discussion
Rachael: It was intended as an initial conversation. It's not tied to a subgroup
Shadi: is this something I could help with?
Rachael: Certainly
... I'll be facilitating this discussion
Shawn: Wednesday there are other
TPAC events.
... Thursday we'll get into the options for building a
conformance model.
... My understanding is that the options will come from the
working sessions between the pre-discussion and the Thursday
morning.
Rachael: Yes, we also have core questions we'll be working from.
<Rachael> this is a working document we will build out based on Monday and Tuesday to craft Thursday and Friday: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_yqsQyGe4fJ6y1XaU14Cuhupm8HZqykhPTGBpgugzNo/edit#gid=0
Shawn: The session after that
will be evaluating those options. There will be several such
sessions.
... We're hoping to do quite a bit work on conformance next
week.
... The second half on Friday morning is on use cases.
Rachael: That was potentially going back to the conformance options subgroup.
Janina: I'll be with ARIA that time.
Rachael: If we have time, we may
slip on Monday / Tuesday, in which case this may be better for
after TPAC
... If we do it we'll do it in the 8:30 session then.
Shawn: Following that we have a
retrospective, and then one more working session
... Was there anything anyone else wanted to bring?
Rachael: I'll continue to fill
out and update the schedule.
... We heard some conversation on conformance vs compliance.
There's the concept of just measuring and compliance.
... Session 3 is to talk about the overlap and figure that
out.
Shawn: If there's nothing else. I want to note, please fill out the surveys, but they are short and concrete.
<Lauriat> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-silver/2022Sep/0009.html
Rachael: As people finish their presentations, add them to the agenda
This is scribe.perl Revision VERSION of 2020-12-31 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Default Present: Lauriat, maryjom, Makoto, Wilco, Azlan, ToddL, Poornima, Rachael Present: Lauriat, maryjom, Makoto, Wilco, Azlan, ToddL, Poornima, Rachael No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: Wilco Inferring Scribes: Wilco WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth WARNING: No date found! Assuming today. (Hint: Specify the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.) Or specify the date like this: <dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]