<scribe> scribe: ToddL
2 +1 and no negatives. rule should be ready for AG
five rules ready for AG
ChrisLoiselle: Raised editorial issues, wanted to clarify
kathy: a few rules on hold for
different reasons.
... Scrollable element is keyboard accessible rule. needs to
get together with Tom
dmontalvo: Title doesn't need to be empty, there needs to be discussion on that one.
trevor: no real updates. Wilco told trevor to email him, will ping Wilco again
dmontalvo: #1912 still open
#1894 was Jennifer's, kathy will take over, hasn't done anything with that yet.
ChrisLoiselle: #1873 needs re-reviews by approvers, more editorial, nothing should hang this up.
<kathy> https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/1873/files
ChrisLoiselle: Will get back to group about #1873
kathy: priority issues are mostly
kathy and Wilco
... #1875 nothing to report here today
<ChrisLoiselle> I responded to Wilco's comment with a comment on https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/1873/files, he talks to including and excluding the wording around essential, so we can bring up next week on decision to exclude or include in expectations.
heading description, Tom, kathy, Todd have similar comments on applicability and expectations
Wilco wanted to discuss aria-hidden if needed in the heading case
group is currently looking at Heading is descriptive rule
ChrisLoiselle: points out the "or" in the Applicability
question is do we need the aria-hidden example.
dmontalvo: Not sure practice of
aria-hidden in a heading is these days.
... looks to be a edge case. This has value leaving the passed
example 7 there.
group discussing failed example 4
trevor: Does that example Passed Example 7 not fail 1.3.1?
kathy: I think it would fail 1.3.1
dmontalvo: agrees
trevor: Wilco wanted to split this into two rules, split the applicability in half.
kathy: Heading descriptive looks like it is not ready to go.
Todd will take up Heading descriptive as liaison
kathy: re: text has enhanced
contrast, some failed examples would fail 1.4.3
... Passed example 3 has been changed already, retest if
necessary
#1791 is still open.
#1763 is still open
improve the definition of highest possible contrast to include where colors are from and select highest possible contrast added to TF conclusions
trevor: feels like this needs a short algorithm to do this
kathy: looks like we needs some updates before publishing
trevor: this may need to wait for the secondary requirements, right?
kathy: this is only for the enhanced.
trevor: think we have a separate rule for AA
kathy: will put text has enhanced contrast for update needed.
Tom will be liaison for text has enhanced contrast
<kathy> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/531
kathy: will go over most recent updates
group discussion about PR 531
may need to look for another word or phrase for "conformance" and suggestions are welcome
group is discussing comments on PR 531