<scribe> scribe: dmontalvo
Wilco: Present the text, the
definitions, and the use cases
... Beign explicit that this is about text-to-speech
... the rationale and whether or not the group agrees that this
is a good direction to take
Daniel: People may ask about more granular lagnauge parts. Do we want to say that this is not part of this method but may be pa rt of future ones?
Wilco: Sounds good to me
Francis: Do we trim down the rest of the document that we are not presenting?
Wilco: Let's split from the ACT rules part onwards
Francis: Also trimming the test
tab, the background, the bibliography, and the
assumptions
... Also get rid of the last section "soundness of
requirements"
Daniel: Wiki or Google Docs? What's preferred?
Wilco: Either of those would work.
Francis: I reached JEanne, I did not hear from her
DAniel: Let's figure out permissions and document location later. It's good as long as everybody can access it
Wilco: I would like to get the
groups agreement if we want to proceed with this narrow version
where we look at specific assistive technology features
... Basically to be sure people agrees with us getting only
into text-to-speech
... "Pronunciation of text" as a short hand for correct
pronunciation of text
... "Pronuncation of text" would be the requirement
Daniel: I would agree for the title to restrict in accordance with the rest of the document
[Participants work on the document]
Daniel: Individual Words (don’t
require language change) not sure if we should prase this like
that, there might be other metohds /outcomes requiring this and
we have had comments in the past asking for those
... I would feel comfortable saying we have not found examples
to provide consistent ways of testing language at a word level
+ the pronunciation may be also affected by speech synthesizer
dictionaries which goes beyond appropriate markup
Wilco: Work on text language,
define terms, simplify where you can
... I think we've done quite a bit of these
... If we get agreement form silver we could proceed to step 5,
HOwtos and Methods
Francis: Good.
This is scribe.perl Revision VERSION of 2020-12-31 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Present: Francis, Wilco, Daniel Regrets: Jeanne Found Scribe: dmontalvo Inferring ScribeNick: dmontalvo WARNING: No date found! Assuming today. (Hint: Specify the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.) Or specify the date like this: <dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]