scribe+

Avneesh: Madeleine, are there updates from ONIX?

Madeleine: I have to check, I can check with Gregorio

Gregorio: me too, I can help

Madeleine: we can contact EditEUR and check

Avneesh: introduction, do we need the landing page, or the principle page is enough?
... we can put a link in the principle page, and then from there to the techniques

George: I agree

CharlesL: maybe we should simply add the information in the principle document

Gregorio: we decided to maintain the documents separately

Avneesh: it is not a specification, so we would have no problems
... ...updating

CharlesL: would it be a note?

Avneesh: a CG note

Madeleine: would it be possible to add a link to the techniques index and and say "as the time of this document the available standards are..."

George: yes, and maybe add item to consideration for future work

Avneesh: we may have a issue tracker for future works

Madeleine: from an UI it is not simple to understand which are links and which are static text

CharlesL: in the title we don't say "Principles document", maybe we can add it for consistency

Madeleine: we may edit all the titles to make them consistent

<Bill_Kasdorf> +1 to Madeleine

George: maybe I disagree: the highest level document should be the principles

Madeleine: maybe we can use "Guide" instead of "Principles" and define in the introduction that these are the principles

Avneesh: other improvements?
... rename "Schema.org" as "EPUB accessibility metadata", issue #8
... conforms to, in the principles we should not jump directly to the links

CharlesL: I agree, also we have "idpf.org"

Avneesh: I can open an issue

George: also when we'll have the ISO name approved

AlexGrover: I appreciate the document, I think that starting with principles makes a lot of sense

CharlesL: for "All accessibility metadata" I think it's a little bit weak, where are we going to show all the different possible values?

Avneesh: you are talking about Schema.org values, EPUB accessibility values
... I think it's not correct to list them here

<CharlesL> https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Accessibility

CharlesL: may we transform this wiki page as a CG note?
... maybe we can publish it as an APA note

Avneesh: the question is: would it make more difficult to edit this document?
... in the APA env we will get a heavy process
... I have another suggestion: in W3C we have CGs, which are free for participants, maybe we can create a new CG for maintaining
... this values

George: are no other groups working on Schema.org?

Madeleine: there should be a vocab-CG

George: are we starting a new CG outside publishing, with all the web as scope?

Avneesh: work is the same, but if we put in the publishing world, people thinks it is only for publishing

CharlesL: yes, I think it is more general

* do we get money for new CGs we create? :) *

Avneesh: we can define in the charter a process for edit the docs

Bill_Kasdorf: what if we ask to Schema.org?

<Bill_Kasdorf> need to keep Dan Brickley in the loop

Madeleine: they usually say they manage the properties, not the vocabularies

CharlesL: If we move them, we have to ask to who started

Madeleine: I think it's us :)

George: APA does horizontal reviews

<Madeleine> Relevant page, not updated since 2013

<Madeleine> https://www.w3.org/2013/04/vocabs/

Avneesh: main topic

gpellegrino: I can help editing

This is scribe.perl Revision of Date 
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Present: Avneesh gpellegrino Bill_Kasdorf AlexGrover Naomi CharlesL George Madeleine
No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: gpellegrino
Inferring Scribes: gpellegrino

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.


WARNING: No meeting title found!
You should specify the meeting title like this:
<dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting


WARNING: No date found!  Assuming today.  (Hint: Specify
the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.)
Or specify the date like this:
<dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002

People with action items: 

WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report


WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)