W3C

- DRAFT -

Mobile Accessibility Task Force Teleconference

05 Dec 2019

Attendees

Present
Kim, Jennifer, Jake
Regrets
Chair
Kimberly_Patch
Scribe
Kim_Patch

Contents


[11:01] == Kim_Patch [~Kim_Patch@public.cloak] has joined #mobile-a11y [11:02] == laura [~laura@public.cloak] has joined #mobile-a11y [11:10] <Kim_Patch> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ouVFq4w-i0rchNHtTAG_JoRwHfYm9mN2MkxFBct1JSI/edit [11:10] == laura [~laura@public.cloak] has quit [laura] [11:11] <Kim_Patch> TOPIC: custom interactions [11:12] <Kim_Patch> Jake: the proposed SC text I completely changed, added a note, also cleaned up previous [CUT]

benefits, rewrote three paragraphs

Jake: first we need to have consensus on the new success criteria text
... I hope we solved two problems – first, what is custom, we turned it around to say what isn't custom, that makes it easier
... also standards and how to deal with it. If they can be used with the standard interactions than that one is also completely off the table

but it leaves us with two questions. The definition of what is standard. We talked about it last time but I would like to see if it's feasible. We need to know if it's possible before we work it out.

so if it seems valid we can continue to work it out

Jake: there's one thing we didn't solve now, but it's an interesting one. If you don't know there is a custom interaction how can you test it?
... I know Detlev brought it up and it is logical because your test procedure should be do everything humanly possible to see if there is something, but I'm not sure if that's always needed for Success criteria, because of that is so then you can never get it.
... so the test procedure is an interesting one – how do you know? You can look in the code or do we need to have another approach. We know there is an interaction which is not standard so it's custom let's see if it's documented – something like that.
... everything before user benefits is new – the SC, the four paragraphs

Reading the SC using suggesting mode

Jake: the most important part is the fourth paragraph in Benefits

Note – Forgot to start Trackbot at the start of the meeting, so I started it late and added the brief minutes.

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.154 (CVS log)
$Date: 2019/12/05 17:38:00 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154  of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Default Present: Kim, Jennifer, Jake
Present: Kim Jennifer Jake

WARNING: Possible internal error: join/leave lines remaining: 
        <Kim_Patch> [11:01] == Kim_Patch [~Kim_Patch@public.cloak] has joined #mobile-a11y [11:02] == laura [~laura@public.cloak] has joined #mobile-a11y [11:10] <Kim_Patch> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ouVFq4w-i0rchNHtTAG_JoRwHfYm9mN2MkxFBct1JSI/edit [11:10] == laura [~laura@public.cloak] has quit [laura] [11:11] <Kim_Patch> TOPIC: custom interactions [11:12] <Kim_Patch> Jake: the proposed SC text I completely changed, added a note, also cleaned up previous [CUT]


No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: Kim_Patch
Inferring Scribes: Kim_Patch

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.

Found Date: 05 Dec 2019
People with action items: 

WARNING: Possible internal error: join/leave lines remaining: 
        <scribe> [11:01] == Kim_Patch [~Kim_Patch@public.cloak] has joined #mobile-a11y [11:02] == laura [~laura@public.cloak] has joined #mobile-a11y [11:10] <Kim_Patch> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ouVFq4w-i0rchNHtTAG_JoRwHfYm9mN2MkxFBct1JSI/edit [11:10] == laura [~laura@public.cloak] has quit [laura] [11:11] <Kim_Patch> TOPIC: custom interactions [11:12] <Kim_Patch> Jake: the proposed SC text I completely changed, added a note, also cleaned up previous [CUT]



WARNING: Possible internal error: join/leave lines remaining: 
        <scribe> [11:01] == Kim_Patch [~Kim_Patch@public.cloak] has joined #mobile-a11y [11:02] == laura [~laura@public.cloak] has joined #mobile-a11y [11:10] <Kim_Patch> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ouVFq4w-i0rchNHtTAG_JoRwHfYm9mN2MkxFBct1JSI/edit [11:10] == laura [~laura@public.cloak] has quit [laura] [11:11] <Kim_Patch> TOPIC: custom interactions [11:12] <Kim_Patch> Jake: the proposed SC text I completely changed, added a note, also cleaned up previous [CUT]



WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report


WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]