agenda/
<scribe> scribe: janina
Janina: agenda review
ian: Asks to postpone css in the meeting
Agenda somewhat populated.
We'll start conversation about subagenda for the Math on the Web joint mtg
zakin next item
janina: Will tweak Work Statement per agreed comments and repost to everyone asking whether they still approve
Janina points to github link asking for comment. Expect this for discussion at TPAC
<Chris> welcome, Amy
ian: Reviewed text levels 3 &
4, no issues
... some response on scrollbars
amy: Looking at css font level
4
... Only possible problem 2.1.3 -- some questions and
concerns
... Do they need alt? What do sr do with emoji's? They're not
standardized
mc: Believe they're saying "use any font" to render the emoji
mc; Another property find there are defined text versions for the graphic version
mc: Expect if there's a problem
it's not the css spec
... Believe this only defines for unicode, so should be
ok
... Do have issue on "wing ding" gliphs
... Suggest accessibility impact statement request
irfan: Asking about twitter?
mc: Don't believe a W3C member
irfan: Large user of their own stuff
ian: Notes can be problem for Dragon users
mc: We need to identify whether the spec is wrong or some practices misues the specs. Affects the remedy we attempt
css: Some gliphs may have different meanings in certain circumstances; but would have single text equivalent
mc: Believe using fonts for
iconography contravenes spirit and intent of the spec
... But is that the font module? Somewhere else?
... Twitter use case is interesting--does it argue for alt on
use of certain gliphs?
<IanPouncey> https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues/17
ian: Process concern on another topic?
mc: Closing issue on our end doesn't help us track? Should we keep ours open until we're satisfied with the resolution?
janina: Please look. We need a11y represented. Who?
<MichaelC> CSS Scrollbars Module Level 1
Is "no need to review" re CSS Scrollbars
<Chris> that's my mistake, Michael - apologies
Ian: Has been reviewed. We need a
note--will be filing
... Minimum contrast issue
CSS Text 3 & 4
Ian: We have a closed issue on 3
Identity for WebRTC 1.0
After discussion, no need. It's a split from the reviewed doc.
Nav Timing Level 2
<MichaelC> ACTION: janina to review https://www.w3.org/TR/navigation-timing-2/ Navigation Timing Level 2 - due 4 weeks
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2181 - Review https://www.w3.org/tr/navigation-timing-2/ navigation timing level 2 [on Janina Sajka - due 2018-10-31].
We're concerned about its use in identifying pwds
<MichaelC> action-2181: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Navigation_Timing_Level_2
<trackbot> Notes added to action-2181 Review https://www.w3.org/tr/navigation-timing-2/ navigation timing level 2.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154 of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Default Present: janina, MichaelC, Joanmarie_Diggs, IanPouncey, Irfan, Chris, JonnyJames Present: janina MichaelC Joanmarie_Diggs IanPouncey Irfan Chris JonnyJames Regrets: Leonie John_Foliot Found Scribe: janina Inferring ScribeNick: janina Found Date: 03 Oct 2018 People with action items: janina WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]