e
harold: FHIR is coming up on R4. Need to find out what they'll think if we start mucking w RDF again.
david: Grahame wanted to see evidence of FHIR/RDF use. We have a tutorial almost ready fo released (from Harold's webinar), and Harold is using it and Joao wanted to use it.
harold: We should contact Grahame
directly about FHIR/RDF. We'll be doing a presentation at
SWAT.
... Most interesting thing is NCATS translator group. We've
created a FHIR researouce (proposed it) for exchanging
aggregated statistical data. We'll be presenting it to the
group. They want to tie it into OBO, Monarch and Disease Ont
that they're doing. Want to use ICD-10 and LOINC codes. RDF
will make that a whole lot easier.
... That will give us some traction. Need to tell Grahame to
hold off, because the promise of RDF is opening doors.
... HL7 meeting end of Sept is in Baltimore.
david: Should check with Michael Van Der Zel also, about his continued interest.
harold: Can we get an active team involved again?
<scribe> ACTION: Harold to contact Grahame about re-vitalizing FHIR/RDF
harold: JH looking at Trinetix,
put together by big pharma. Looks like I2B2 with better
GUI.
... I want to pursue fhir.schema.org . Grahame said I could
host it on his site.
... I think that could have a lot of future.
<scribe> ACTION: David to find Marc T's email for Harold
harold: Might use JSON-LD for
warehousing FHIR.
... The FHIR reference tag now has a type field to indicate the
target type. So we don't have to parse the URL to figure it
out!
http://build.fhir.org/rdf.html
david: RDF is not mentioned on the home page, though JSON and XML are: http://build.fhir.org/
Harold: what to do about Tony's FHIR ontology? http://w3c.github.io/hcls-fhir-rdf/spec/ontology.html
david: Need to mark it as obsolete, and point to http://build.fhir.org/fhir.ttl
<scribe> ACTION: David to make FHIR downloads page point to http://build.fhir.org/fhir.ttl
http://build.fhir.org/downloads.html
david: also, what about the
formal spec on the W3C site? http://w3c.github.io/hcls-fhir-rdf/spec/
... Would the FHIR shex file be enough? http://build.fhir.org/fhir.schema.shex.zip
harold: The shex is not enough. But should we document it in the W3C space or HL7 space?
david: A big benefit of putting
it in the HL7 space is it could be part of the FHIR build
process.
... But it increases the chances of it being pruned.
Harold: I'm out next week.
<scribe> ACTION: Harold to review the two links on FHIR RDF spec (from minutes)
ADJOURNED
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s|T-minus one minute: https://hangouts.google.com/call/al34mdviyvgahgs2r7z45idmom|| Succeeded: s/Trianetix/Trinetix/ WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy <amy> Present+ No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: dbooth Inferring Scribes: dbooth WARNING: No date found! Assuming today. (Hint: Specify the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.) Or specify the date like this: <dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002 People with action items: david harold WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]