pedestal: vlad

<behdad> yo

<scribe> scribenick: rsheeter

hey

Mugshots

Looking for pictures with color and awesomeness people

Action Items

Vlad: mobile perf? (which action ?)

kuettel: started, looks good for woff2. Need to capture and share.

action-116?

<trackbot> action-116 -- David Kuettel to Decoder performance analysis on mobile devices -- due 2016-04-06 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/116

Vlad: A visual explanation of overall time consumed (load, decompress, etc) would be nice to have

(discussion of what data we want and how we might obtain it; item due date pushed out)

action-172?

<trackbot> action-172 -- Chris Lilley to Register font media types -- due 2016-04-30 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/172

Vlad: seems to be moving along nicely

action-186?

<trackbot> action-186 -- Roderick Sheeter to Try time (decode) and size for null glyf/loca xform vs regular vs woff1 -- due 2016-03-16 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/186

Me: Have first draft but suspicious of one set of #'s, wnat to poke more before publishing

action-199?

<trackbot> action-199 -- Khaled Hosny Ghetas to Investigate how we actually verify at tests, particularly how we verify internal handling. -- due 2016-03-30 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/199

(no update, push date for now)

Test Suite

mustRejectInvalidBase128

mustNotRejectIncorrectTotalSize

https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent

mustLoadFontCollection - test looks fine; might be worth adding a note that no UA actually supports at this time

Vlad: might be good to discuss at TPAC

mustNotRejectGlyfSizeMismatch

https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-Decoder

mustReconstructLSBs

mustLoadFontCollection

- I read the test as meaning it would be OK to unshare the tables as long as the result was a valid collection. Maybe clarify that there should be no change in which tables are/are not shared?

jfkthame: maybe that's OK specwise even if it's an inefficient implementation

https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-Format

reservedFlagsMustBeZero

transformFlagsMustBeSet

I think there was discussion of how this would actually be verified. Maybe one simple way would be just by looking at the transformed length and flags? - it should have these X flags and be Y bytes smaller type of deal.

(discussion of The Validator)

https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-AuthoringTool

mustCheckLSBAllGlyfTables, mustNotApplyLSBTransformForOTC

Marked for attention but seem fine

Vlad: because I snuck them in while you were not looking
... That leaves us with just implementation for tests )

In Your Face at ATypI

Vlad: ATypI will be good for our group. TPAC will offer a chance to chat with other groups, such as with CSS about fragments and collections.
... and the wooorld of tomorrow
... js api for deeper access to fonts, subsets, loading, etc might be a fun area to explore.
... Further suggestions welcome, including going outside current charter

behdad: maybe something about variations, css, better compressing them?

kuettel: unicode-range issues might be fun to chat with css group about
... so are we definitely doing both? (atypi, tpac)

vlad: strongly recommended
... last call

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.144  of Date: 2015/11/17 08:39:34  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found ScribeNick: rsheeter
Inferring Scribes: rsheeter
Default Present: Vlad, RSheeter, behdad, kuettel, kenlundeadobe
Present: Vlad RSheeter behdad kuettel kenlundeadobe jfkthame
Found Date: 06 Apr 2016
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2016/04/06-webfonts-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.