See also: IRC log
<kerry> trackbot, start meeting
<trackbot> Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel.
<kerry> trackbot, this will be sdw
<trackbot> Sorry, kerry, I don't understand 'trackbot, this will be sdw'. Please refer to <http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc> for help.
<kerry> scribe: DanhLePhuoc
<kerry> scribeNick: RaulGarciaCastro
<kerry> scribe: RaulGarciaCastro
<kerry> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Patent_Call
kerry: Not many people around
kerry: We need to publish the
FPWD soon
... … end of March, 1st week April
... … that is our first big goal
... … we could publish SSN as it is now
... … being ambitious, also modularization would be good
... … it is important that the W3C staff sees some progress
RaulGarciaCastro: It would be nice to also include in the FPWD what we plan to deliver by the end of our work
<kerry> +1
<DanhLePhuoc> +1
+1
kerry: We can talk about this
next meeting (with more people)
... … with the other editors
http://webprotege.stanford.edu/#Edit:projectId=dc983c6a-c144-4d5a-a2a2-1f8d25d1ad54
kerry: People should have rights to edit the ontology
DanhLePhuoc: Not everyone needs to have editing permissions to comment
RaulGarciaCastro: If we modularise the ontology at the end we will have different projects
kerry: Yes, I think it was that way
DanhLePhuoc: Right now there are two projects, not sure how to link them
kerry: Where are the axioms in Webprotege?
<DanhLePhuoc> http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/WebProtegeUsersGuide
DanhLePhuoc: In the OWLEntityDescriptionBrowser tab
<DanhLePhuoc> http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/WebProtegeUsersGuide#The_OWL_Entity_Description_Editor
DanhLePhuoc: … and Editor
<kerry> please look at user guid and have a go
<ahaller2> apologies for being late, what is the webex link?
<kerry> Armin, can pls give raul permission to edit on webprotege!
<kerry> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:SSN-Telecon20160308
https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m7fa998124d164729c095b8c83a45f52d
<ahaller2> yes, what is his username?
<kerry> armin, the webex link on that page works
sdwssn
rgcmme
that’s my user name in Webprotege
<kerry> http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/
kerry: ahaller2 already has editing permissions in github
ahaller2: We have agreed to
remove dolce
... … do we need further modules?
<kerry> agree -- no precedent for this
ahaller2: … will splitting the ontology make it more usable?
<kerry> also agree -- it is no that much
kerry: multiple namespaces is annoying and you have to constantly look for things you need in other places
RaulGarciaCastro: we could analyse the use cases and see what extent of the ontology is expected to be used
ahaller2: All modules, even if they have different namespaces, could be in the same file
DanhLePhuoc: it’s not necessary to split everything but we can have different profiles
kerry: some use cases deal with
observations, others with platforms…
... … we could do some profiling
... … we can put the current modules in the W3C namespace
RaulGarciaCastro: Once we define some URIs, people will start using them
ahaller2: I’m concerned of publishing something not finished
+1
<DanhLePhuoc> +1
RaulGarciaCastro: Putting the
modules proposal in the FPWD would make no harm
... … and if everyone agrees we publish it
... … and if there are concerns we wait
kerry: not just the modules, the
complete modules
... the ontologies themselves
DanhLePhuoc: Like in software, people could use profiles and look for the origin of the different ontology components
I’m not sure I got well this last part
kerry: People could simply use
the vocabulary terms of the ontology, but it would be nice if
reasoning can also be used
... dereferencing the ontology terms should lead to the
ontology
... … we can test this with the current splitted version of the
ontology
... … and implementing content negotiation
ahaller2: It would be nice to
have it to play
... … multiple modules will also lead people to use incorrect
namespaces
kerry: We can do that and then discuss up to what extent modularize
<kerry> ACTION: ahaller2 to get the 2 ontology modules on w3c namespace with phila, to experimentation [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/03/08-sdwssn-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel.
kerry: if anyone wants to chair
these meetings, just tell
... … will be happy if people gives suggestions on topics for
the meeting
Bye
<kerry> rrsagent. draft minutes