W3C

- DRAFT -

SV_MEETING_TITLE

04 Nov 2015

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
JeniT, jtandy, gkellogg, danbri
Regrets
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
danbri

Contents


<gkellogg> Looks like it needs Ivan to start it?

really? uhoh. he's in china

<gkellogg> We could try Google Hangouts, or Skype, I suppose.

<JeniT> ok, so perhaps we can just do this by IRC

I've a schema.org bridge we can borrow if we want. But text mode is fine by me too.

<JeniT> I think all we need to do is propose & agree the transition to Proposed Recommendation

yeah

<jtandy> ok

<JeniT> unless anyone had anything else that you think we need to discuss?

there was one outstanding issue on you JeniT

<jtandy> ... and the UCR stuff?

<JeniT> the only issue I see on me is the Primer

looks like you did it, whatever it was :)

<JeniT> given I made the change to the model document the other day

https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22For+Proposed+Rec%22 wasn't empty before. Yeah that was it.

<JeniT> jtandy: and you did the UCR stuff?

ok so is it just "This WG resolves that the specifications are complete, and requests transition to Proposed Recommendation (on Nov 24th 2015)."?

<jtandy> no -

<gkellogg> Theres https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/775, but I think there’s nothing to do

<jtandy> it was on Ivan's list of things ...

see mail from Ivan, "UCR finalization?"

<jtandy> for the UCR stuff we're looking at ISSUES 536, 537, 538 and 539

<jtandy> (oh and 481)

<JeniT> that shouldn’t hold up our transition on the other documents

<JeniT> UCR is a Note, final version to be published when the other docs move to Rec (same time as Primer)

<jtandy> I see that Ivan asks if this can be done before 24-Nov. Unfortunately that's still a "No"

<jtandy> Quoting Ivan: "Do you think this is something you could do between now and the 24th, or should I gloss over this in my PR Transition request? The former would be better…"

I think a fine gloss paint is in order here, so long as the larger schedule is considered viable / safe.

<JeniT> jtandy: it looks like the PR transition request that Ivan has currently put together glosses over it

<JeniT> danbri: I think we need to explicitly list the specs that we are agreeing to transition

<JeniT> in our resolution

<jtandy> that's good ... I've not read the details of the PR transition

<JeniT> https://github.com/w3c/csvw/blob/gh-pages/admin/PRTransitionRequest.txt

<JeniT> everyone OK if we go through the resolutions?

<jtandy> ah yes - I see: "The group intends to publish a final version of the UCR document as a WG Note at the time of publishing the REC"

JeniT you want one big sausage of a resolution, or several small ones?

<jtandy> ... that would make it the same time as the Primer note gets published ... and danbri 's note about wrapping stuff in HTML

<JeniT> One big one is fine, but I think it needs to list the documents and say that we resolve to request the transition

<JeniT> ScribeNick: danbri

attending: Jeni, Gregg, Jeremy, Dan; regrets: Ivan (china travel)

<gkellogg> rssagent, start

(it's funny, we each remember different bits of the bot command language)

Ok, logs are logged.

"Dearly beloved, we are gathered here today, in the presence of rrsagent, …"

ok drafting give me a couple mins

Do we want exact URLs in there?

text otherwise I suggest is """The WG resolves that its work on "Model for Tabular Data and Metadata on the Web", "Metadata Vocabulary for Tabular Data", "Generating RDF from Web Tabular Data" and "Generating JSON from Web Tabular Data" is complete and requests that W3C advance them to Proposed Recommendation status."""

Comments on the text welcomed, before I type it prefixed PROPOSED, after which we should +1.

<JeniT> just a sec

<JeniT> can we adjust the titles to the correct ones

I copied these from Ivan :/

<JeniT> namely, the transformation specs actually are called “Generating JSON from Tabular Data on the Web” and “Generating RDF from Tabular Data on the Web”

ok

revision is """The WG resolves that its work on "Model for Tabular Data and Metadata on the Web", "Metadata Vocabulary for Tabular Data", “Generating RDF from Tabular Data on the Web” and “Generating JSON from Tabular Data on the Web” is complete and requests that W3C advance them to Proposed Recommendation status.

URLs: http://w3c.github.io/csvw/syntax/index.html?specStatus=PR;publishDate=2014-11-24 http://w3c.github.io/csvw/metadata/index.html?specStatus=PR;publishDate=2014-11-24 http://w3c.github.io/csvw/csv2rdf/?specStatus=PR;publishDate=2014-11-24 http://w3c.github.io/csvw/csv2rdf/?specStatus=PR;publishDate=2014-11-24#h-sotd """

shall I propose it?

<jtandy> yes

<JeniT> yep

PROPOSED: The WG resolves that its work on "Model for Tabular Data and Metadata on the Web", "Metadata Vocabulary for Tabular Data", “Generating RDF from Tabular Data on the Web” and “Generating JSON from Tabular Data on the Web” is complete and requests that W3C advance them to Proposed Recommendation status.

URLs: http://w3c.github.io/csvw/syntax/index.html?specStatus=PR;publishDate=2014-11-24 http://w3c.github.io/csvw/metadata/index.html?specStatus=PR;publishDate=2014-11-24 http://w3c.github.io/csvw/csv2rdf/?specStatus=PR;publishDate=2014-11-24 http://w3c.github.io/csvw/csv2rdf/?specStatus=PR;publishDate=2014-11-24#h-sotd 

<jtandy> +1

+1

<gkellogg> +1

<JeniT> +1

<JeniT> +1 (from Ivan)

RESOLUTION: The WG resolves that its work on "Model for Tabular Data and Metadata on the Web", "Metadata Vocabulary for Tabular Data", “Generating RDF from Tabular Data on the Web” and “Generating JSON from Tabular Data on the Web” is complete and requests that W3C advance them to Proposed Recommendation status.

URLs: http://w3c.github.io/csvw/syntax/index.html?specStatus=PR;publishDate=2014-11-24 http://w3c.github.io/csvw/metadata/index.html?specStatus=PR;publishDate=2014-11-24 http://w3c.github.io/csvw/csv2rdf/?specStatus=PR;publishDate=2014-11-24 http://w3c.github.io/csvw/csv2rdf/?specStatus=PR;publishDate=2014-11-24#h-sotd 

<JeniT> excellent, thanks all

Congratulations everyone :)

<JeniT> danbri: would you be able to put that in an email to the list please?

Do we have any more business for today?

<jtandy> hooray ... ticker tape and trumpets blare

Sure. Let's handle it as minutes.

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.140 (CVS log)
$Date: 2015/11/04 15:20:54 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.140  of Date: 2014-11-06 18:16:30  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found ScribeNick: danbri
Inferring Scribes: danbri

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.

Present: JeniT jtandy gkellogg danbri

WARNING: No meeting title found!
You should specify the meeting title like this:
<dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting


WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Got date from IRC log name: 04 Nov 2015
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2015/11/04-csvw-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]