See also: IRC log
QingAn asks the way W3C Editors work
Wonsuk explains it briefly
wonsuk: leads the group's editing
work
... provides sentences and ask the group for opinions
... if there is no objection, we apply the text
... some of the group can lead to generate the spec
... it would be great if some of the editors provide initial
text
... and some of them provide comments
qingan: what if we have multiple editors?
wonsuk: good comment
... when we edit some part of the spec
... we can assign specific sections to each editor
... while editor A is editing section A, editor B can edit
section B
... only one editor edits his/her assigned part
... others can review it
qingan: make sense
paul: so different editors edit
different parts
... the issue is how do you know agreement on merging all the
changes
... the changes should be provided for call for review
... "github issues" is a good mechanism
wonsuk: ok
... one thing I'd say is
... some of the editors work on some part of the spec
... we need to know who is the expert for which section
... how can we assign reviewers for which parts
paul: we have QingAn, Wonsuk,
Justin, Kevin and Adam
... we used to have two editors
... they basically had discussion among the editors
... seems to me the spec is big enough
... could be broken up
... might want to think about that option
wonsuk: it might be confusing to
make slices of the spec
... QingAn and myself can coordinate with each other
... and work with the other editors
... we can start with that way
... we can change the approach later if needed
... so only QingAn and myself merge the changes as the
coordinators
ted: whatever the group would do
is fine
... good to have issues and mailing list discussion
kaz: making consensus on the github issues and the mailing list would be less confusing given we have multiple editors
paul: three of the editors are
from similar time zone
... also Kevin and Adam are from UK
... editors from each group should work together
... can deligate each other
wonsuk: ok by me
... if I couldn't join some of the meetings
... or if QingAn couldn't join
... we can communicate with each other and share the
information
paul: ok
... we can use the minutes to share the information as
well
... the main thing here is making consensus beforehand
wonsuk: Kevin wants to be an
active editor
... which is welcome
... if we have one or two more editors that's fine
... we can align with each other
paul: some mechanism like that would work
wonsuk: ok
paul: will send the policy to the
group list
... would see what would happen
... any other comments?
wonsuk: question to Ted
... you're editing the editor's draft for publication
... after the publication, can I change the document status
from "Working Draft" to "Editor's Draft"?
ted: we can use another branch
for that purpose
... but we can simply change the document itself
... we can have feedback for publication
... published version is located on the W3C server under the
/TR area
... can use branches to manage multiple versions
... depending on the group's need
wonsuk: we just make an editor's
draft
... and published version is installed under the /TR area
ted: working drafts are to be
published every 3-4 months
... we can have two separate branches, one for editor's draft
and another for publication
... we can get comments to older versions as well
wonsuk: how many WGs already use the automatic publication option?
ted: HTML WG is a big example
wonsuk: ok
paul: anything else?
(nothing)
[ adjourned ]