See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 14 April 2015
<scribe> scribenick: SteveZ
Mike_Champion, Jeff, and SteveZ discussed the options for handling TAG participation. It was agreed that the decision on how to proceed with the AC Review is the AB's. It was agreed that the AB should consider the proposal sent to the CG as a proposal and that the AB has the freedom to choose to simply ballot Process 2015 as it now exists or they could choose to ballot to the two versions
scribe: If the AB ballots a single version it will be up to the Director to resolve any formal objections, if the two versions are balloted the Director must make sense of the votes (which may be difficult due to lack of precedents for such votes)
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.140 of Date: 2014-11-06 18:16:30 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/../.../ Succeeded: s/tow/the two/ Succeeded: s/resolve and/resolve any/ Found ScribeNick: SteveZ Inferring Scribes: SteveZ WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. Default Present: SteveZ, Jeff, Mike_Champion Present: SteveZ Jeff Mike_Champion Regrets: Chaals David_Singer Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2015Apr/0060.html Found Date: 14 Apr 2015 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2015/04/14-w3process-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]