See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 08 April 2015
<kerry> who is on the phone?
<erich> i am
<JoshLieberman> aabb is me
<kerry> you cant her me?
Kerry only just ..
<stlemme> I guess I'm P7
<Frans> I have learned the merits of muting myself, as a heavy breather
<kerry> you cannot hear me?
Kerry - NO
http://www.w3.org/2015/04/01-sdw-minutes.html
http://www.w3.org/2015/04/01-sdw2-minutes.html
<phila> PROPOSED: Accept the two sets of minutes
+1
<Linda> +1
<IanHolt> +1
<AndreaPerego> +1
<erich> +1
<MattPerry> +1
<aharth> +1
<phila> +1
<Alejandro_Llaves> +1
<JoshLieberman> +1
<SimonCox> +1
<billroberts> I wasn't there so can't comment!
<Frans> +1
<kerry> i zakim, [ipcaller is me
<phila> RESOLVED: Accept the two sets of minutes
<scribe> scribe : eparsons
<phila> scribe; eparsons
<Frans> I promise to read up on scribing, so I can do it a next time
<phila> scribe: eparsons
<phila> scribeNick: eparsons
<kerry> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Patent_Call
Thx !
<scribe> scribe:eparsons
<phila> Doodle Poll
<phila> Leading candidate time
kerry: Doodle Poll open until end of the week
<SimonCox> No good options :-(
<Zakim> phila, you wanted to ask if next week will be at the new time or old?
Phila: next week new time ?
Kerry: Depends - leave it open another week - need to give notice
<phila> The use cases
kerry: Main business summary of two meetings
<phila> The Spreadsheet
kerry: Volunteers ?
<phila> scribe: phila
eparsons: We worked through all
the UCs we had
... and then abstract onto the spreadsheet the requirements
<aharth> kerry, could you mute, there's an echo on your line
eparsons: as the process went on,
we came up with fewer and fewer new requirements
... most reqs came from first third of the UCs
... need to put more detail on those reqs
... make sure we agree on the meaning
... may need go back to the UC authors and check that the Reqs
make sense
... I need to talk to Frans and make sure he's happy with what
we have so far
Frans: Yes... it's nice to see
this
... I see the work has swicthed from the wiki to the
spreadsheet
... I saw one Req was added
... as proof of the additional work done
... I do have one question.
... One of the Reqs in the spreadsheet for the BP - I assume
each req has passed the scoping questions?
-> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Scope_questions_and_Requirements Scoping questions
eparsons: I think we prob need to
go through the reqs again to apply the scoping questions
... just to check that we're in scope
... that's my sense that we do need to do that
<AndreaPerego> +1
<Alejandro_Llaves> Agree with Ed
kerry: From the otehr group, they were implicitly being done as we went along. It's worth a check but I think we're OK on that.
eparsons: So I think that covers it from the BP work
<eparsons> Phila I'm back on scribe
<Alejandro_Llaves> +q
<scribe> scribe: eparsons
Alejandro_llaves: similar
approach
... good idea to apply scope questions again
<SimonCox> +1 Alejandro_Llaves comment on scope of Time Ontology!
Alejandro_Llaves: SimonCox
questioned some time reqs
... Need to rephrase reqs next week , checks reqs have
associated use case
<phila> Frans's work on the UCR so far
kerry: Action in tracker (good practice)
<phila> ACTION: Kerry to review the requirements against the use cases she added [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/04/08-sdw-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-13 - Review the requirements against the use cases she added [on Kerry Taylor - due 2015-04-15].
kerry: Phila can help with syntax
<phila> action-13?
<trackbot> action-13 -- Kerry Taylor to Review the requirements against the use cases she added -- due 2015-04-15 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/13
phila: How actions work - swg emails will be picked up by tracker
<phila> ACTION: erich to review the requirements against the use cases she added [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/04/08-sdw-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-14 - Review the requirements against the use cases she added [on Erich Bremer - due 2015-04-15].
Kerry: Ask people to add actions ?
Phila: erich ?
<billroberts> ACTION: billroberts to review requirements for use case 34 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/04/08-sdw-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Error finding 'billroberts'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/users>.
Linda: I do already :-)
<MattPerry> ACTION: Matthew to review requirements for use case 16 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/04/08-sdw-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-15 - Review requirements for use case 16 [on Matthew Perry - due 2015-04-15].
Frans: Would it be possible for Reqs to be expanded some only two words
<CoryHenson> ACTION: CoryHenson to review the requirements against the use case he added [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/04/08-sdw-minutes.html#action05]
<trackbot> Error finding 'CoryHenson'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/users>.
Kerry: Would this stop you moving
fwd ?
... Please do as much as you can to add detail
<phila> ACTION: Cory to review the requirements against the use case he added [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/04/08-sdw-minutes.html#action06]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-16 - Review the requirements against the use case he added [on Cory Henson - due 2015-04-15].
<BartvanLeeuwen> ACTION: BartvanLeeuwen to review requirements for use case 13 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/04/08-sdw-minutes.html#action07]
<trackbot> Error finding 'BartvanLeeuwen'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/users>.
<AndreaPerego> About actions, just to note that we're still missing Clemens's and Chaals's actions from the Barcelona F2F: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Minutes_from_Best_Practice_deliverable_group#Summary_of_Action_Items
<phila> ACTION: Bart to review the requirements against the use case he added [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/04/08-sdw-minutes.html#action08]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-17 - Review the requirements against the use case he added [on Bart van Leeuwen - due 2015-04-15].
Kerry: Editors please ask contributors to check
<phila> ACTION: bill to review requirements for use case 34 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/04/08-sdw-minutes.html#action09]
<phila> ACTION: bill to review requirements for use case 34 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/04/08-sdw-minutes.html#action10]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-18 - Review requirements for use case 34 [on Bill Roberts - due 2015-04-15].
<billroberts> thanks phila - have just added a nick for myself
Kerry: Action against Coryhenson
Coryhenson: done :-)
Kerry: coverage reqs still need
to be done, but hold off for a few weeks before extra
meeting
... Any other qs on use cases
Erich: Interest Nuclear segmentation - large images - thanks phila for his homework
Kerry: Next topic wiki
... Better use, call and email useful but would like wiki to be
used more
... email may get lost...
... wiki better for recording
... take a look a wiki now - main page>work in
progress..
... Added pages for references - existing work to link to use
cases
... Explain why it is useful, feel free to add new pages
... Also wish list - ideas that could be done in addition to
deliverables
... Thanks to those who have already contributed...
... Glossary - place to add terms even if you are
uncomfortable
... Ontology design principles a good example...
... Main point is to document stuff using the wiki...
... Any q's
Phila: wiki is active doc, when
group is closed it will be frozen as a archive
... Use mailing list rather than individual emails for same
reason
Kerry: Completed agenda for today - please vote on time poll
<AndreaPerego> Thanks, bye
<BartvanLeeuwen> thx kerry
<BartvanLeeuwen> bye
<erich> thanks, bye
<Linda> bye
<Alejandro_Llaves> thanks, bye!
<IanHolt> Thanks Kerry. Bye
<JoshLieberman> bye
<phila> trackbot, end meeting
Kerry: Thank you for your attendance - see you some time next week !