See also: IRC log
<Vivienne> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/47076/FlorenceF2F/results
VC: 4 probably can attend
... others at W4A but not at the meeting
SAZ: question how useful the face-to-face would
be at this stage
... maybe if Silvia and Justin are sure they will have the E-Learning report
ready
VC: could work with people individually
SAZ: maybe should focus our energy right now on getting the group moving more smoothly and look for a face-to-face opportunity later in the year
MH: agree
VC: maybe meeting time conflicts
<mhakkinen> +1 to no f2f at w4a
RESOLUTION: RDWG will not be holding a F2F meeting at WWW2015
<Vivienne> +1
VC: combined challenges and research
opportunities
... looking for feedback
SAZ: are some of these questions too detailed?
... or good to be specific?
MH: good to be specific
SAZ: how would it be for other topics?
MH: we may need to abstract for others
SAZ: concerned about the volume and
maintenance
... expecting a brief summary
MH: may not need to be uniform across all topics
<Judy> [judy speaking for a catalog that is broad, in terms of topics, but that does not need to be of uniform depth]
https://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Accreditation
http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/charter4
JB: less understanding of the purpose of the
group
... easier to understand the role of WCAG and WAI-ARIA than the broader
aspects of accessibility
... increasing the reach of RDWG could be made more clear
... happy to contribute ideas to make sections clearer
... would be important to make progress until next week
MK: have been looking at it and had some thoughts too
VC: good to take a fresh look at it
JB: coherent Charter but needs to be better
explained
... will try to be available for the second half of next week's meeting