W3C

Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group Teleconference

25 Feb 2015

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Samuel, Shadi, Carlos
Regrets
Emmanuelle
Chair
Shadi
Scribe
Shadi

Contents


https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2015Feb/0007.html

http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/WD-AERT/ED-WAET20141215#fragments

[[Many websites are generated by combining HTML code snippets with pre-set templates. Evaluation tools, especially those that are integrated into Content Management Systems (CMS) and Integrated Development Environments (IDE), can help check such code snippets during their development. Such checking is usually done by creating DOM document fragments [DOM] from the code snippets, that are then evaluates as web content.]]

what are the issues with this paragraph?

CV: not sure why you are referencing tests selection

SM: previously we did not only refer to the section but also explained the relationship

CV: also, why note - why not just part of the text?

https://w3c.github.io/w3c-waet/WAET.html#ownTests

http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/WD-AERT/ED-WAET20141215#custom

SAZ: what about the summary, should we have it or not?

CV: seems repetitive and does not help

<samuelm> https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues/73

SM: maybe adding the "sumamries" to the table in section 3
... could serve as a template for developers

SAZ: should we publish an interim draft?

SM: not a good idea if we know we will make changes

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.140 (CVS log)
$Date: 2015/02/26 13:29:33 $