See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 29 January 2015
scribenick LJWatson
<tantek> re: 1a DOM bugs re: Document object - have not had the chance to talk with Boris about it.
<rubys> ACTION-254?
<trackbot> ACTION-254 -- Robin Berjon to Triage and prioritise DOM bugs based on incompatible tests (+XMLDocument#load) -- due 2014-12-19 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/254
SR: One action on Robin.
PLH: Robin is in Japan.
SR: Had a F2F poll.
<rubys> http://intertwingly.net/tmp/w3c-spring-2015.html
SR: Preference for Redmond in HTML, and preference for Zaragoza in WebApps.
PLH: Suggestion to re-open the
poll.
... Sam you thought co-location wasn't necessary?
... We co-located before because people asked for it.
SR: Next steps?
PLH: Would like feedback from WebApps chairs.
SR: Problem - Canvas work has stalled. Sent a note that's had two responses.
PLH: Has been discussion about work that's required. Don't think there has been a conclusion.
<rubys> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-canvas-api/2015JanMar/0000.html
PC: Where did that discussion happen?
PLH: Judy, Rich and Janina have been discussing it I think.
JS: Yes.
... Part of the issue is to understand what's missing.
PLH: Thought the issue was a lack of tests?
<rubys> https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Canvas_Task_Force/CR-Test
JS: Believe tests are done.
SR: The wiki references hit regions.
JS: Draw focus ring is the thing
that's closest to ready.
... Hit regions will take longer.
PC: What's the status on the doc itself?
SR: Next step is to return to
LC.
... We do that when we think it's ready. Need to look at
whether things like hit region should remain.
... We'll go with what the group discussing this comes up
with.
... Any other business?
<plh> http://w3c.github.io/webrtc-charter/webrtc-charter.html
PLH: WebRTC charter - contains a lot of media APIs. We're defining the media interface, so we should be aware of this.
PC: Is there a diff available?
PLH: The deliverables have
changed.
... Don't expect this group to do anything. This is just
FYI.
SR: Could you post that to public-html and/or media sub-group?
PLH: Yes.
PC: Recc track deliverables, the media deliverables seem to be joint deliverables?
PLH: Yes.
PC: So have these items been in existence for some time?
PLH: It's possible.
PC: Editorially most things on
the WebRTC scope are joint deliverables.
... It makes sense for us to rationalise where media work is
happening?
PLH: Yes.
PC: Has this taken the new streams into consideration?
PLH: I don't know.
PC: Looks like get user media doesn't reference the streams.
<tantek> what is the recent (HTML5) history behind keeping the <title> element as required? (as opposed to making it optional)
<rubys> Neither Sam nor Shane recall this being discussed in either the HTML WG or XHTML context
<tantek> second question was, appears that spec doesn't say what browsers should do if <title> element is missing, was that a deliberate omission, or just not discussed during HTML5?
PLH: Searched bugzilla and
nothing came up.
... Best approach would be to raise a bug.
SM: I'll scribe next time.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.140 of Date: 2014-11-06 18:16:30 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/to WebApps/to public-html/ No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: LJWatson Inferring Scribes: LJWatson Default Present: Sam, ShaneM, janina, tantek, paulc_, LJWatson, Plh Present: Sam ShaneM janina tantek paulc_ LJWatson Plh Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-announce/2015JanMar/0007.html Found Date: 29 Jan 2015 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2015/01/29-html-wg-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]