ISSUE-34: 2 disjuncts at a time in sh:OrConstraint

OrConstraint

2 disjuncts at a time in sh:OrConstraint

State:

CLOSED

Product:

SHACL Spec

Raised by:

Simon Steyskal

Opened on:

2015-04-02

Description:

I was wondering whether we want to "limit" ourselves to 2 disjuncts (i.e. sh:shape1 & sh:shape2) at a time, rather than having potentially n disjuncts as proposed by Eric's "sh:choice" construct.

Ofc, one could nest another sh:OrConstraint within sh:shape2 and if necessary another one in the nested one and so forth, but I guess this gets pretty ugly/verbose very quickly.

Any thoughts on this? Or am I missing something?

cheers,
simon

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: shapes-ISSUE-34 (OrConstraint): 2 disjuncts at a time in sh:OrConstraint [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-04-03)
2. Re: shapes-ISSUE-34 (OrConstraint): 2 disjuncts at a time in sh:OrConstraint [SHACL Spec] (from simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at on 2015-04-02)
3. Re: shapes-ISSUE-34 (OrConstraint): 2 disjuncts at a time in sh:OrConstraint [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-04-02)
4. shapes-ISSUE-34 (OrConstraint): 2 disjuncts at a time in sh:OrConstraint [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-04-02)

Related notes:

Display change log