See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 15 December 2014
<ShaneM> huh - that didnt woprk
<ShaneM> trying again
<JF> Chair+ John Foliot agenda+ Identify Scribe agenda+ Media Accessibility User Requirements: Remaining Comment Responses agenda+ Finalize Responses to Commenters agenda+ Finalize MAUR
<JF> Chair + John Foliot
<JF> scribe: JF
discussing BBC/Nigel's response to our response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2014Dec/0035.html
<MarkS> scribe: MarkS
<ShaneM> http://w3c.github.io/pfwg/media-accessibility-reqs/#requirements-on-the-use-of-the-viewport
SM: RE: [VP-5] perhaps it should be positioned such that, editorial important content is not obscured.
JF: and what are we saying?
... that sentence is a mouthful. can we whittle this down?
SM: I think we need to do two
things. 1. there is a req that the UA MUST avoid
... then there is a note
... not too concerned about covering all of his points. think
we just need another note about contained environments where
overlap is most likely going to happen.
JF: this is the last comment we have to deal with, right?
SM: yes
JF: once we get this done, we can move this toward formal note status
SM: need to send responses to
commenters
... i have drafts
... we still need to review them (per agenda)
JF: should we note that we are going to take nigel's comment and work it into the note?
SM: yes
<scribe> ACTION: ShaneM to incorporate nigel's comment [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/12/15-html-a11y-media-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-293 - Incorporate nigel's comment [on Shane McCarron - due 2014-12-22].
<ShaneM> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/MAUR_Comment_Processing_2
SM: I put the comments into the wiki.
JF: I took a look at this earlier. Think this is sufficient, especially if we keep this wiki as a record.
SM: I was thinking of actually referencing the wiki.
JF: that works for me
MS: These look great to me
JF: We didn't really reject
anything except for that one. And that is well documented here,
so I think this is at the point that once we update the BBC
comment, this is good.
... Probably won't be doing much more before the new year with
the holidays approaching.
SM: I think the moratorium is
fast approaching, thursday maybe, so we have three weeks
here.
... if we adjourn early, I can take care of drafting the change
based on Nigel's response now.
SM: make BBC change, draft responses, send responses, publish
JF: so first week of january?
SM: yes, I think that is
realistic.
... there may be a bottleneck after moratorium gets
lifted.
... liam will probably take care of the formal publication
steps
... I'll mention it to him next time we talk
... propose we do not meet next week.
JF: so when should we meet
again?
... glad to not meet on the 29th either. I am out 1/5/2015
SM: I say we meet on the Fifth without JF. should be plenty of time to review the pub before then.
RESOLUTION: next meeting is January 5th, 2015
[adjourned]
<JF> NOTE: attendees on the phone were Shane, JF and MarkS
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.140 of Date: 2014-11-06 18:16:30 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/yes// Succeeded: s/pho9ne/phone/ Found Scribe: JF Inferring ScribeNick: JF Found Scribe: MarkS Inferring ScribeNick: MarkS Scribes: JF, MarkS ScribeNicks: JF, MarkS WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: JF MS MarkS NOTE SM ShaneM https inserted trackbot You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 15 Dec 2014 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2014/12/15-html-a11y-media-minutes.html People with action items: shanem[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]