W3C

Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference
10 Dec 2014

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
janina, James_Nurthen, Fred_Esch, JF, Michael_Cooper, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, ShaneM, lisa_seeman
Regrets
Cynthia, Joanie
Chair
Janina
Scribe
Fred_Esch

Contents


<trackbot> Date: 10 December 2014

<janina> agenda: this

<janina> scribe: Fred_Esch

preview agenda with items from two minutes

<MichaelC> Colour blindness accessibility Community Group

mc: : color blindness community group is of interest

Previous Meeting Minutes https://www.w3.org/2014/12/03-pf-minutes.html

RESOLUTION: publish minutes as submitted

End of Year Holliday Scheduling -- Reminder

Janina: next week will be last meeting of the year

Actions Review (Specs) http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/open

<scribe> ACTION: 1536 to shane [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/12/10-pf-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Error finding '1536'. You can review and register nicknames at <https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/users>.

mc: : goes through actions

<MichaelC> action-1536: http://www.w3.org/TR/mixed-content/

<trackbot> Notes added to action-1536 Review mixed content for a11y concerns.

new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html#tr_LCWD

mc: expects lots of publications next week

rs: does MC need to move SVG docs?

mc: yes, I will move it next week

Touch Events Followup https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-wai-pf/2014OctDec/0079.html

janiana: 3 years ago... we started looking at this, what is our intent?

<MichaelC> Placeholder page on Touch a11y mapping

<janina> Lisa, 92473#

<janina> yes?

rs: we talked about device independence... are we concerned about accessibility?
... interaction model discussion
... we may not need a separate mapping as each platform has intellectual property...
... need a way for platform independent actions
... whether we have an API for actions, is that enough?
... has a spreadsheet what apple supports

janina: we are beyond keyboard input, needs to be in indy UI group

rs: it would be nice to have same terminology for device independent groups
... maybe modules should be the way to address responsive input... since we have overlap of groups

mc: : we talked about doing a placeholder doc ... not sure what the documentation should look like

janina: will discuss in indy UI work group next week
... and will dove tail with web events...

<Zakim> MichaelC, you wanted to ask about pointer events and outcome of touch events cg

mc: communities are confused...

janina: we think indy UI should do it, in coordination with other groups, concerned about IP
... knows what to do on next steps

CSS3 Issue 43 https://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css3-ui#issue43

mc: sent a comment to css, about making focus outline invisible, asked for a warning in the spec

<MichaelC> As the outline on elements in the ‘:focus’ state is depended on by keyboard users for interaction with the page, authors should not make the outline invisible on such elements without making sure an alternative highlighting mechanism is provided.

mc: add warning to authors

RESOLUTION: accept css resolution to CSS issue 43

Action 1536

<ShaneM> http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-mixed-content-20140722/

sm: description of section 4.3
... is there any requirement to expose mixed content, via AT?
... explains mixed content - secure content which might contain insecure, possibly brought in from another site...

rs: what is the value of knowing it is a mixed site?

sm: you can block some mixed content if you want, like media that may come from somewhere else

janina: should be uag\

rs: browsers dont implement UAAG
... they need to follow WCAG.

jn: provides example of mixed content, concern of third party services (auto captions...) where the media comes from secure content but the captions come from a non secure source

<Zakim> JF, you wanted to comment on the impact ehre for third-party "audio descriptions", etc

<Zakim> jamesn, you wanted to ask if browsers expose the secure/insecure info to AT at the moment

<jamesn> ok

rs: wants to ensure we accessible - AT already expose stuff like this

<Zakim> ShaneM, you wanted to ask if we should be commenting to this group or someone else?

<janina> Shane's suggestions at:

<janina> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2014Dec/0090.html

mc: sending comment (on time) content from Shane's email

RESOLUTION: Michael will send opening comments per Shane's email

janina: ARIA new day tomorrow, authoring meeting in old ARIA time on Mondays

jf: has concern on heartbeat

janina: some issues, but we need to get group consensus when we have issues

rs: there are lots of issues in the heartbeat
... we are months away from recommendation...

jf: just commenting on thread...

mc: will bring back conversation on xtech, to pf list

<JF> need clarity around definions and difference between UI and GUI

all: discussion on heartbeat issues

rrsagent make minutes

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: 1536 to shane [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/12/10-pf-minutes.html#action01]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.140 (CVS log)
$Date: 2014/12/17 17:11:41 $