<trackbot> Date: 08 October 2014

<scribe> scribenick: ChrisL

Vlad: attached new spec to agenda
... we can continue editing test plans

open and pending actions

action-143?

<trackbot> action-143 -- Vladimir Levantovsky to Update the spec in regards to the bug -- due 2014-09-17 -- PENDINGREVIEW

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/143

Vlad: decided to change name of table to transform glyph table with explicit definition
... also noticed some things about LOCA calculation, changed toa nrmative requirement
... in section 5.1
... also some minor changes on bounding box, ref impl was not same as spec, stream size plyus length of bbox, see email
... so let us keep it like the Google implementation
... not pretty but ok

action-144?

<trackbot> action-144 -- Vladimir Levantovsky to Add langauge to the WOFF2 spec to define how checksum of the 'head' table should be treated -- due 2014-09-19 -- PENDINGREVIEW

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/144

Vlad: added explicit UA reqmt to update checksums
... now normative statements, need testing

action-147?

<trackbot> action-147 -- Vladimir Levantovsky to Update spec for bbox dropping criteria, min max of all coordinates -- due 2014-09-23 -- PENDINGREVIEW

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/147

Vlad: added one para in 5.1 second para after table
... detailed description of calc bbox and conditions when to omit it or keep it
... and explicit for composite glyph

action-151?

<trackbot> action-151 -- Vladimir Levantovsky to Change first paragraph of section 3 to remove reference to private data compression -- due 2014-09-23 -- PENDINGREVIEW

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/151

Vlad: removed indication about compressing. its opaque binary data

jfkthame: needs a bit more clarification on the table itself
... the semantic portion on various streams. its a sequence of uint16 not a single uint16
... and how many entries they have

Vlad: depends on actual glyph records

jfkthame: sizes in bytes, needs to be explicit, size in words or bytes

Vlad: ok

http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/spec/ now updated in cvs

Vlad: better if we drop the additional description as stream defined later

jfkthame: ok, redundantr but still say size in bytes

Vlad: any other comments

jfkthame: no but not carfefully read through it yet

close action-143

<trackbot> Closed action-143.

close action-144

<trackbot> Closed action-144.

close action-147

<trackbot> Closed action-147.

close action-150

<trackbot> Closed action-150.

close action-151

<trackbot> Closed action-151.

action vlad to review and update description field of transform glyph table

<trackbot> Created ACTION-152 - Review and update description field of transform glyph table [on Vladimir Levantovsky - due 2014-10-15].

open actions

http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/open

action-133?

<trackbot> action-133 -- Raph Levien to Review the spec edits and finalize the definition of the "nominal size" -- due 2014-10-15 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/133

Vlad: hope to hear from Raph on this
... david could you ping him on that?

action-145?

<trackbot> action-145 -- Roderick Sheeter to check padding and alignment in reference implementation -- due 2014-09-21 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/145

RSheeter: not yet

action-146?

<trackbot> action-146 -- Chris Lilley to Use ietf-w3c liaison to get review and guidance for next steps on brotli id -- due 2014-09-23 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/146

ChrisL: (summaries emails)

Vlad: is informational rfc enough?

ChrisL: yes

Vlad: david can you ask your compressions folks for a reviewer

kuettel_: ok so wehen the ID is refreshed, suggest reviewers
... also setting up a top level project for brotli as discussed at f2f

ChrisL: also provide some context on places the spec is used

action-148?

<trackbot> action-148 -- Vladimir Levantovsky to Review and edit the conformance test for extraneous data -- due 2014-09-23 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/148

Vlad: not domne yet

action-149?

<trackbot> action-149 -- Chris Lilley to Check expectations regarding cts from ietf -- due 2014-09-23 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/149

ChrisL: not found much, keep open

reviewing spec changes

Vlad: please read changed parts and email comments
... test plans have some mistakes, need to update them

kuettel_: a diff would be useful

ChrisL: will look for one and send it out

test plan

Vlad: can do this on the phone but hard without spec changes reviewed
... better to do this in email

tpac meeting

Vlad: several of us are there anyway so lets have an informal meeting
... can we do a call for consensus in email?

ChrisL: yes

Vlad: wednesday will be busy. maybe on tuesday or thursday
... tues pm is ac meeting

ChrisL: tues better than thurs for me

Vlad: hoperaph can attend, tuesday morning/

kuettel_: yes

sergeym: if anyone is going to unicode but not tpac, thursday is better
... john hudson may be going

Vlad: currently tuesday seems better

kuettel_: can set up a hangout, and also space at google offices
... what about time, 8am to 10am

jfkthame: do send out a time but don't be sure i can join
... no preferred time
... depends on what else is happening

Vlad: how about 9am?

kuettel_: earlier means we finish earlier

Vlad: ok, 8am start. please see if raph is available and if 8am is ok for him
... 2 hours is enough

trackbot, end telcon

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138  of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found ScribeNick: ChrisL
Inferring Scribes: ChrisL
Default Present: jfkthame, Vlad, [Microsoft], ChrisL
Present: jfkthame Vlad [Microsoft] ChrisL rod kuettel_
Found Date: 08 Oct 2014
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2014/10/08-webfonts-minutes.html
People with action items: