W3C

Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group Teleconference

24 Sep 2014

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Shadi, Carlos, Samuel
Regrets
Chair
Shadi
Scribe
Shadi

Contents


Issue #50 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues/50

[[No change - Procurement is only mentioned as an example secondary use-case for this document. Relating it to the specific work of Mandate 376. Listing procurement standards seems out of scope for this particular document.]]

Issue #36 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues/36

CV: we now have
... we agreed to rename and reword section 2.1.4 to talk about testing before and after DOM

AZ: be sure to mention that testing after DOM has dependencies on the rendering engine

SAZ: would also be good to mention somewhere in the document, maybe under the crawling section, that crawling can also be done with rendered pages (and the advantages of that)

[[Partial - Section 2.1.4 has been changed to explain the aspect of testing before and after rendering more clearly.]]

Issue #66 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues/66

SAZ: agree that human-readable formats and data formats should be separated

SM: one aspect is the data format, like EARL or CSV
... another aspect is human-readable reports
... suggest three different features
... one for data output in machine-readable formats
... antoehr for input of data from different sources
... and third is the documentation aspect
... also note that some word processor document formats are not considered formal languages

Export Data - Import Data - Export Report

Agreed - split sections 2.3.1 and 2.3.3 into the notion of Export Data - Import Data - Export Report]]

[[Agreed - split sections 2.3.1 and 2.3.3 into the notion of Export Data - Import Data - Export Report]]

Issue #48 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues/48

SAZ: possible to have a section for a new feature
... one that is about recording how the tool addresses each success criterion

CV: that's the purpose of 2.2.2

SAZ: needs to be clearer

CV: agreed

SM: agreed

Issue #46 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues/46

CV: can add clarifications to section 2.1, along the lines of what michael proposes

SAZ: agreed

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.138 (CVS log)
$Date: 2014/10/02 12:24:57 $