See also: IRC log
RESOLUTION: Accessibility and Way-finding, Navigation and Exploration systems Online Symposium 3 December 2014
<Justin> woo hoo
<klaus> +1
<Vivienne> many thanks to Giorgio from me too
SH: Giorgio needs to leave the group
... would to thank him for all his contributions
SH: didn't receive feedback from Judy on her comments yet
SH: waiting for final changes from Yeliz then ready for the group
SH: expecting timeline from Shawn and David
KM: making the document easier to read
... did not receive comments on the content
SH: Christos prepared document for Yehya's review
JB: working on getting the draft ready
https://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Accessibility_and_way-finding,_navigation_and_exploration_systems
<annika> I also made some updates the to link that shadi sent.
SH: people happy with the changes?
VC: yes, happy so far
... think need to focus on the contributions
... was expecting about condensation
SAZ: could look at title
... started with scope, to try to firm up the focus
... then went to introduction and background
AN: many aspects in there
... need to tidy up the questions in the contributions
SH: wondering about Linked Open Data
... seems to be a topic for a different symposium
SAZ: think the contributions section needs to map
to the scope section
... need to agree on the scope section
VC: a lot there and won't be easy to condense
AN: second set is well-related to the Web
... on the other hand might be too broad of a scope
SH: lots of work on the Linked Open Data
... we might be going overboard with this
SAZ: what does the group think of the scope?
VC: happy with it as it is
AN: agree, looks very good
<annika> In the E2R CfP we used "Core Topics" and "Additional Topics". Could we mark the open data as additional topic?
SH: wonder if we need two separate sections for
scope and contributions
... on the other hand, stand well on it's own
... not sure how to fit self-driving cars in here
... mobility was initially part of the thought
KM: trip-planning seems like an interesting
application domain
... also legal issues
... for example, what happens when someone is guided the wrong way
... or a faulty way
SAZ: excellent suggestions but not sure if they
are included in the text at all
... need to include it in the text
... though we may be scope-creeping
... especially mobility is a broader area of work
AN: not sure how related self-driving cars are
with the web
... also the other additions could be broader than the main focus
... could have "core topics" and "additional topics" for the contributions
SH: yes, could be an approach
<annika> +1 for using mobility
<klaus> +1 for orientation and mobility
SAZ: really like the aspect of "mobility", also
as a term
... just concerned if we may be expanding the scope too much
VC: worried that indoor way-finding might be lost could be lost
SAZ: need to be clearly written
... like a "macro" and "micro" level orientation and navigation
SH: can we have a new version ready for next week?
VC: think so
SH: what about the scientific committee
... maybe also people outside the group?
+1 to having people on the SC from outside the group
<Vivienne> +1 to having some experts in the area, as it is not my primary background
<klaus> I allow myself to recommend my colleague - it is his phd topic.