W3C

Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group Teleconference

02 Apr 2014

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Shadi, Carlos, Samuel
Regrets
Christophe, Emmanuelle
Chair
Shadi
Scribe
Shadi

Contents


http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2014Mar/0017.html

[[The main purpose of this document is to promote awareness on such features and to provide guidance for tool developers on what kind of features they could provide in future implementations of their tools. The document could also be used to help compare the features provided by different types of tools in other scenarios like, for example, during the procurement of such tools.]]

http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/WD-AERT/ED-requirements

The document "Techniques for Automated and Semi-Automated Evaluation Tools" is targeted mainly to development managers and developers of web accessibility evaluation tools. Under this scope, we will not distinguish between commercial and open source developers, although there are use cases that could be more relevant to one group than to the other.

A secondary audience of this document are users of accessibility evaluation tools like accessibility experts or web developers.

http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/selectingtools.html

CV: prefer "Guidance on the development of web accessibility evaluation tools"

SM: agree to remove "selection" from title
... prefer to have sub-title
... but if necessary longer title might work

CV: can drop "development"
... though features are part of the development

"Guide to Features of Web Accessibility ..."

"Developer Guide"

CV: "Features of web accessibility evaluation tools: A Developer Guide"

Developers' Guide to Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool Features

(Bim)

"Developer Guide to Features of Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools"

CV: "on" or "to"?

SM: "Developers' Guide"?

"Developer/'s Guide to/on Features of Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools"

Dev Guide

WAET

WAT

WAT-DEV-Guide

CV: do we need that?

SAZ: helps, like in "Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM) "

WAT Guide

WET Guide

CV: will we stay with AERT?

SAZ: moved away from initial concept, now quite different from AERT

CV: considerably different
... confuses people

<samuelm> http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/components.php#guidelines

WET Features

WAT Features

SM: lean towards "Guide" than "Features"

WARF

WAET Guide

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/w%C3%A6t

<samuelm> http://www.abbreviations.com/WAET

Next meeting: 16 April

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.138 (CVS log)
$Date: 2014-04-02 18:36:35 $