W3C

- DRAFT -

WAI AU

10 Feb 2014

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Jan, Jeanne, TomB, Jutta
Regrets
Tim_B., Alex_L., Alastair_C.
Chair
Jutta Treviranus
Scribe
Jan

Contents


1. Any comments to pass along re: UAAG 2.0 Last Call?

<Jan> JT: Any comments?

<Jan> JT: Suggested topics...http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2014JanMar/0014.html

<Jan> JR: SC 5.1.1 Comply with WCAG: Relationship with WCAG2 is nuanced as ATAG2's (http://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/#conf-rel-wcag). Does it need to be?

<Jan> JS: Sending this in would help UA show they have received broad review

<Jan> JT: OK

<Jan> JT: So official comment would be better...

<Jan> JR: I can come up with wording based on our back and forth with WCAG some time back.

<Jan> Authoring tools that render the web content being edited (e.g. Word, Dreamweaver, HTML-Kit)

<Jan> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-UAAG20-20131107/#def-user-agent

<Jan> JT: We have been making the point for many years that the boundary between user agents and authoring tools is arbitrary.

<Jan> http://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/#def-comb-ua-authoring-tool

<Jan> JT: So in review to UAAG what should we say?

<Jan> JR: Maybe just word of advice to them to provide more detail around the fact that the ATAG-UAAG relationship exists.

<Jan> JT: OK

2. Candidate Recommendation (CR) process update

<Jan> JS: MC has now added DB layer

<Jan> JS: So now I can start adding things into DB

<Jan> JS: MC has 2-3 more weeks of work

<Jan> JT: How long till test harness can be used?

<Jan> JS: I will work on putting in the test data.

<Jan> JS: We have the 7 items that need to be prepared for testers.

<Jan> JS: Certainly I will have DB populated soon.

<Jan> JT: OK good news

<Jan> JT: We put out call for help...has there been response?

<Jan> JS: I haven't pushed it yet, because I want things to be ready right away.

<Jan> JT: OK

3. Gathering and building the SEVEN "Tools and Resources Needed for Testing ATAG 2.0 Success Criteria:"

<scribe> scribenick: jeanne

<Jan> JR: Web Content Accessibility Test Procedure (Level A, AA, AAA): Prob can use the WCAG2 test methodology

JR: WCAG Test Procedure: There is a good chance we will be able to use the WCAG test methodology that Tim is working on

<Jan> JR: Platform Accessibility Service Test Procedure: still needs volunteer

<scribe> scribe: Jan

TB: Can do Windows, MacOS, iOS
... I would personally start with Windows

<scribe> ACTION: TB to Prepare Platform Accessibility Service Test Procedure for Windows 7. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/02/10-au-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> 'TB' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., tbabins, fboland).

JR: User Agent Accessibility Test Procedure (Level A only): Not necessary unless authoring tool prevents in market tools from being used for preview
... So not needed now.

<jeanne> ACTION: tbabins to prepare Platform Accessibility Service Test Procedure for Windows 7. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/02/10-au-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-390 - Prepare platform accessibility service test procedure for windows 7. [on Tom Babinszki - due 2014-02-17].

JR: Accessible test content file (Level A, AA, AAA): I will do this.
... Non-accessible test content file (Level A, AA, AAA): I will do this.
... A selection of separate pieces of content: JR as well
... List of "accessible content support features" - this is just a form for tester to fill out - depends on tool.

JS: What Tom is doing can then be used as a model for other platforms.

4. The group will cooperate on a full test of a tool to get a sanity check on our testing procedure.

JR: No conflict of interest I don't think.

JS: Someone else can be assigned to evaluate later

5. Implementation report update (Jan)

JR: Nothing to report.

JS: On Friday I was pointed to Adobe open-source "Brackets"...I will be looking at this
... Brackets

JT: Sugar labs accessible gaming system prototype

<Jutta> [1] http://www.fing.edu.uy/inco/proyectos/butia/ [2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activities/TurtleArt

<Jutta> http://www.sugarlabs.org

6. Re-chartering update

JS: Nothing to report.

7. Other issues?

JT: Next meeting Feb 24 due to CDN and US holiday next Monday.

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: TB to Prepare Platform Accessibility Service Test Procedure for Windows 7. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/02/10-au-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: tbabins to prepare Platform Accessibility Service Test Procedure for Windows 7. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/02/10-au-minutes.html#action02]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.138 (CVS log)
$Date: 2014-02-10 20:10:11 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138  of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/that time is working/that Tim is working/
Succeeded: s/open-source "Barackets"/open-source "Brackets"/
Found ScribeNick: jeanne
Found Scribe: Jan
Inferring ScribeNick: Jan
ScribeNicks: jeanne, Jan
Default Present: Jan, Jeanne, TomB, Jutta
Present: Jan Jeanne TomB Jutta
Regrets: Tim_B. Alex_L. Alastair_C.
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2014JanMar/0020.html
Got date from IRC log name: 10 Feb 2014
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2014/02/10-au-minutes.html
People with action items: tb tbabins

[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]