See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 16 January 2014
<scribe> ScribeNick: fjh
Shelving notes published, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2014Jan/0025.html
Approve minutes from 9 January 2014
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2014Jan/att-0015/minutes-2014-01-09.html
RESOLUTION: Minutes from 9 January 2014 are approved
Marcos proposal and Fernando proposal, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2014Jan/0020.html
fjh: marcos note on next step. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2014Jan/0027.html
anssik: mozilla and google waiting for each other
… no consensus yet whether feature will land, discussion last Nov/Dec
fjh: anything we can do
anssik: not much, keep on table
fjh: there appears to be momentum
on the list
... Fingerprinting issue discussion, general use of "events
only fired at top level browsing context Window object"
language?
anssik: just sent an update to close action
<anssik> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2014Jan/0028.html
ACTION-675?
<trackbot> ACTION-675 -- Anssi Kostiainen to Send update on test status, pull requests on the dap public list -- due 2014-01-16 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/actions/675
anssik: details are in the message, might have some new QA support as well
close ACTION-675
<trackbot> Closed ACTION-675.
fjh: Scheduled review with
Privacy Interest Group (PING) (with Rich) at next PING
teleconference, 30 January 2014 9 am PT/noon ET, see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-privacy/2013OctDec/0036.html
... WebAppSec call to be scheduled for Network Service
Discovery http://www.w3.org/2011/webappsec/
richt: published last 24 Sept, some changes in spec since then, around security, privacy considerations, adopted CORS model
… there are open issues listed in agenda, need to review those
… hasn't been much recent discussion
fjh: do we need to publish an updated WD
richt: lets clarify on call next week, probably
cathy: we need Rich's view on the issues listed in the agenda so that we can discuss
richt: decisions on issues should be based on implementation experience
… might need some clarification of some of them
… discussions going on elsewhere
… we could tweak, but need to make sure of security and privacy, came up in chromium review and elsewhere
<dom> +1 on figuring out the security model as being primordial right now
… in current state it is implementable, would like to document what is going on
fjh: I think Jean Claude had feedback that has not been addressed
jdufourd: yes, we had agreement with Cathy and some items
… completely agree that making sure it is acceptable from security perspective, that is a priority
… some changes proposed have little impact on this aspect
… so should still consider
… question, when you talk about implementation, what does this mean, Opera implementation of 1 1/2 year ago
… my java proxy implementation
… this is up to date with draft I believe
… what other implementation should we know about
richt: chrome extension
… missing UI side
… opt-in
… switched engines on our work, so need to rework code, but need more focus on UI
jcdufourd: UI not part of standard
richt: yes but important
… believe we have discussed most of issues in agenda, I've presented view, not clear what to do, wait for implementations
fjh: can we work through some of
the issues without waiting, if we can
... can we invite someone from Chromium to join PING call to
share issues with PING
richt: cannot say if they can join
fjh: we had review of CORS
richt: we had review of Promises
fjh: will follow up on various reviews
richt: if you are interested in this it would be helpful if you would lobby your favorite browser vendor
<scribe> ACTION: fjh to follow up with WebAppSec and CORs review of Network Service Discovery [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/01/16-dap-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-677 - Follow up with webappsec and cors review of network service discovery [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2014-01-23].
ACTION-666?
<trackbot> ACTION-666 -- Giridhar Mandyam to Check with internal implementers whether vibration api is consistent with chip capabilities -- due 2013-10-17 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/actions/666
gmandyam: did not get answer still looking into it
ACTION-673?
<trackbot> ACTION-673 -- Anssi Kostiainen to Update vibration spec with note related o issue-149 and update status section to list changes since last cr publication -- due 2014-01-16 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/actions/673
<dom> [I didn't send this to public-device-apis, but people in the group might find interesting/entertaining my review of API permissions: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-mobile/2014Jan/0001.html ]
dom: sent report to look at consistency across permissions
fjh: can you please share this with PING
anssik: can you please share with sysapps
none
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/Discover/Discovery/ Succeeded: s/discussi/discuss/ Succeeded: s/ah okay, was just dialing :)// Succeeded: s/ fjh, sure, I just need a few minutes and I can join.// Found ScribeNick: fjh Inferring Scribes: fjh Default Present: anssik, gmandyam, mats, Lisa_DeLuca, Cathy, Dom, fjh, +33.6.77.84.aaaa, jcdufourd, richt Present: anssik gmandyam mats Lisa_DeLuca Cathy Dom fjh +33.6.77.84.aaaa jcdufourd richt Frederick_Hirsch Mats_Wichmann Anssi_Kostiainen Cathy_Chan JeanClaude_Dufourd Rich_Tibbett Dominique_Hazael-Massieux Giri_Mandyam Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2014Jan/0026.html Found Date: 16 Jan 2014 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2014/01/16-dap-minutes.html People with action items: fjh WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]