12:59:39 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/06/12-dwbp-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/06/12-dwbp-irc ←
12:59:41 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs 351
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs 351 ←
12:59:43 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be DWBP
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be DWBP ←
12:59:43 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see DATA_DWBP()9:00AM scheduled to start in 1 minute
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see DATA_DWBP()9:00AM scheduled to start in 1 minute ←
12:59:44 <trackbot> Meeting: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference
12:59:44 <trackbot> Date: 12 June 2015
13:00:45 <Zakim> DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has now started
Zakim IRC Bot: DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has now started ←
13:00:53 <Zakim> + +39.349.096.aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: + +39.349.096.aaaa ←
13:01:12 <Zakim> +HadleyBeeman
Zakim IRC Bot: +HadleyBeeman ←
13:01:33 <Zakim> +??P8
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P8 ←
13:01:50 <deirdrelee> zakim, who is here?
Deirdre Lee: zakim, who is here? ←
13:01:50 <deirdrelee> Guest: Newton Calegari
13:01:50 <deirdrelee> Regrets: Eric Stephan, PhilA
13:01:50 <Zakim> On the phone I see +39.349.096.aaaa, HadleyBeeman, ??P8
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see +39.349.096.aaaa, HadleyBeeman, ??P8 ←
13:01:52 <Zakim> On IRC I see deirdrelee, Zakim, RRSAgent, newton, rhiaro, hadleybeeman, trackbot
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see deirdrelee, Zakim, RRSAgent, newton, rhiaro, hadleybeeman, trackbot ←
13:02:07 <riccardoAlbertoni> zakim, +39.349.096.aaaa is me
Riccardo Albertoni: zakim, +39.349.096.aaaa is me ←
13:02:08 <Zakim> +riccardoAlbertoni; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +riccardoAlbertoni; got it ←
13:02:09 <Zakim> + +1.609.557.aabb
Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.609.557.aabb ←
13:02:13 <Zakim> -??P8
Zakim IRC Bot: -??P8 ←
13:02:25 <riccardoAlbertoni> hi all!
Riccardo Albertoni: hi all! ←
13:02:44 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
13:02:57 <Zakim> +??P12
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P12 ←
13:03:01 <deirdrelee> zakim, [ipcaller] is me
Deirdre Lee: zakim, [ipcaller] is me ←
13:03:01 <Zakim> +deirdrelee; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +deirdrelee; got it ←
13:03:08 <newton> Zakim, +??P12 is me
Newton Calegari: Zakim, +??P12 is me ←
13:03:08 <Zakim> sorry, newton, I do not recognize a party named '+??P12'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, newton, I do not recognize a party named '+??P12' ←
13:03:22 <newton> Zakim, who's here?
Newton Calegari: Zakim, who's here? ←
13:03:22 <Zakim> On the phone I see riccardoAlbertoni, HadleyBeeman, +1.609.557.aabb, deirdrelee, ??P12
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see riccardoAlbertoni, HadleyBeeman, +1.609.557.aabb, deirdrelee, ??P12 ←
13:03:24 <Zakim> On IRC I see yaso1, BernadetteLoscio, Eric_Kauz, riccardoAlbertoni, deirdrelee, Zakim, RRSAgent, newton, rhiaro, hadleybeeman, trackbot
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see yaso1, BernadetteLoscio, Eric_Kauz, riccardoAlbertoni, deirdrelee, Zakim, RRSAgent, newton, rhiaro, hadleybeeman, trackbot ←
13:03:27 <hadleybeeman> hadleybeeman has changed the topic to: agenda https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20150612
Hadley Beeman: hadleybeeman has changed the topic to: agenda https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20150612 ←
13:03:31 <newton> Zakim, ??P12 is me
Newton Calegari: Zakim, ??P12 is me ←
13:03:31 <Zakim> +newton; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +newton; got it ←
13:03:59 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
13:04:05 <antoine> zakim, IPcaller is me
Antoine Isaac: zakim, IPcaller is me ←
13:04:05 <Zakim> +antoine; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +antoine; got it ←
13:04:28 <hadleybeeman> zakim, who is here?
Hadley Beeman: zakim, who is here? ←
13:04:28 <Zakim> On the phone I see riccardoAlbertoni, HadleyBeeman, +1.609.557.aabb, deirdrelee, newton, antoine
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see riccardoAlbertoni, HadleyBeeman, +1.609.557.aabb, deirdrelee, newton, antoine ←
13:04:30 <Zakim> On IRC I see antoine, yaso1, BernadetteLoscio, Eric_Kauz, riccardoAlbertoni, deirdrelee, Zakim, RRSAgent, newton, rhiaro, hadleybeeman, trackbot
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see antoine, yaso1, BernadetteLoscio, Eric_Kauz, riccardoAlbertoni, deirdrelee, Zakim, RRSAgent, newton, rhiaro, hadleybeeman, trackbot ←
13:04:52 <Zakim> +??P14
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P14 ←
13:04:57 <Zakim> +??P13
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P13 ←
13:05:02 <yaso1> Zakim, ??P13 is yaso
Yaso Córdova: Zakim, ??P13 is yaso ←
13:05:02 <Zakim> +yaso; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +yaso; got it ←
13:05:14 <Eric_Kauz> zakim, aabb is me
Eric Kauz: zakim, aabb is me ←
13:05:14 <Zakim> +Eric_Kauz; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +Eric_Kauz; got it ←
13:05:31 <hadleybeeman> zakim, who is here?
Hadley Beeman: zakim, who is here? ←
13:05:31 <Zakim> On the phone I see riccardoAlbertoni, HadleyBeeman, Eric_Kauz, deirdrelee, newton, antoine, ??P14, yaso
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see riccardoAlbertoni, HadleyBeeman, Eric_Kauz, deirdrelee, newton, antoine, ??P14, yaso ←
13:05:34 <Zakim> On IRC I see phila, PeterWinstanley, antoine, yaso1, BernadetteLoscio, Eric_Kauz, riccardoAlbertoni, deirdrelee, Zakim, RRSAgent, newton, rhiaro, hadleybeeman, trackbot
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see phila, PeterWinstanley, antoine, yaso1, BernadetteLoscio, Eric_Kauz, riccardoAlbertoni, deirdrelee, Zakim, RRSAgent, newton, rhiaro, hadleybeeman, trackbot ←
13:06:19 <hadleybeeman> zakim, ??p14 is PeterWinstanley
Hadley Beeman: zakim, ??p14 is PeterWinstanley ←
13:06:19 <Zakim> +PeterWinstanley; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +PeterWinstanley; got it ←
13:06:47 <yaso1> scribe: yaso
(Scribe set to Yaso Córdova)
13:07:05 <hadleybeeman> http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-06-05
Hadley Beeman: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-06-05 ←
13:07:34 <yaso1> PROPOSED: APPROVE LAST WEEK'S MINUTES: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-06-05
PROPOSED: APPROVE LAST WEEK'S MINUTES: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-06-05 ←
13:07:38 <hadleybeeman> +1
Hadley Beeman: +1 ←
13:07:39 <Eric_Kauz> +1
13:07:39 <deirdrelee> +1
Deirdre Lee: +1 ←
13:07:44 <yaso1> +1
+1 ←
13:07:47 <newton> +1
Newton Calegari: +1 ←
13:07:50 <riccardoAlbertoni> +1
Riccardo Albertoni: +1 ←
13:07:53 <Zakim> +??P15
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P15 ←
13:07:58 <laufer> +1
Carlos Laufer: +1 ←
13:08:05 <BernadetteLoscio> BernadetteLoscio
Bernadette Farias Loscio: BernadetteLoscio ←
13:08:05 <Makx> +1
Makx Dekkers: +1 ←
13:08:07 <antoine> +1
Antoine Isaac: +1 ←
13:08:16 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
13:08:19 <BernadetteLoscio> zakim,??p15 is BernadetteLoscio
Bernadette Farias Loscio: zakim,??p15 is BernadetteLoscio ←
13:08:19 <Zakim> +BernadetteLoscio; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +BernadetteLoscio; got it ←
13:08:32 <laufer> Zakim, IPcaller is me
Carlos Laufer: Zakim, IPcaller is me ←
13:08:32 <Zakim> +laufer; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +laufer; got it ←
13:08:34 <yaso1> zakim, mute yaso
zakim, mute yaso ←
13:08:34 <Zakim> yaso should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: yaso should now be muted ←
13:08:40 <hadleybeeman> zakim, yaso1 is yaso
Hadley Beeman: zakim, yaso1 is yaso ←
13:08:40 <Zakim> sorry, hadleybeeman, I do not recognize a party named 'yaso1'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, hadleybeeman, I do not recognize a party named 'yaso1' ←
13:08:41 <laufer> Zakim, mute me
Carlos Laufer: Zakim, mute me ←
13:08:41 <Zakim> laufer should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: laufer should now be muted ←
13:08:53 <hadleybeeman> scribe: yaso1
13:08:58 <BernadetteLoscio> zakim, mute BernadetteLoscio
Bernadette Farias Loscio: zakim, mute BernadetteLoscio ←
13:08:58 <Zakim> BernadetteLoscio should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: BernadetteLoscio should now be muted ←
13:09:57 <laufer> thank you, Zakim
Carlos Laufer: thank you, Zakim ←
13:10:30 <hadleybeeman> RESOLVED: APPROVE LAST WEEK'S MINUTES: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-06-05
RESOLVED: APPROVE LAST WEEK'S MINUTES: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-06-05 ←
13:10:44 <BernadetteLoscio> zakim, unmute BernadetteLoscio
Bernadette Farias Loscio: zakim, unmute BernadetteLoscio ←
13:10:45 <Zakim> BernadetteLoscio should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: BernadetteLoscio should no longer be muted ←
13:10:47 <Zakim> -riccardoAlbertoni
Zakim IRC Bot: -riccardoAlbertoni ←
13:11:12 <yaso1> topic: Vote on the BP document next PWD
13:11:19 <Zakim> +riccardoAlbertoni
Zakim IRC Bot: +riccardoAlbertoni ←
13:11:23 <BernadetteLoscio> zakim, unmute BernadetteLoscio
Bernadette Farias Loscio: zakim, unmute BernadetteLoscio ←
13:11:23 <Zakim> BernadetteLoscio was not muted, BernadetteLoscio
Zakim IRC Bot: BernadetteLoscio was not muted, BernadetteLoscio ←
13:11:27 <BernadetteLoscio> 1 min
Bernadette Farias Loscio: 1 min ←
13:12:03 <phila> -> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html BP Doc Editor's Draft
Phil Archer: -> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html BP Doc Editor's Draft ←
13:12:20 <BernadetteLoscio> im sorry
Bernadette Farias Loscio: im sorry ←
13:12:29 <BernadetteLoscio> i dont know whats wrong :(
Bernadette Farias Loscio: i dont know whats wrong :( ←
13:12:56 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: yes!
Bernadette Farias Loscio: yes! ←
13:13:14 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: we went in to the comments track
Bernadette Farias Loscio: we went in to the comments track ←
13:13:38 <yaso1> ... we wrote some notes for each comment, the comments are from
... we wrote some notes for each comment, the comments are from ←
13:13:48 <yaso1> ... (inaudible)
... (inaudible) ←
13:14:18 <BernadetteLoscio> im gonna try another way
Bernadette Farias Loscio: im gonna try another way ←
13:14:28 <BernadetteLoscio> you can check the comment tracker
Bernadette Farias Loscio: you can check the comment tracker ←
13:14:39 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: sorry :-/
Bernadette Farias Loscio: sorry :-/ ←
13:14:52 <yaso1> newton: BernadetteLoscio was saying that she went to the comments tracker
Newton Calegari: BernadetteLoscio was saying that she went to the comments tracker ←
13:15:06 <yaso1> ... there is some comments that I would like to check,
... there is some comments that I would like to check, ←
13:15:09 <Zakim> -BernadetteLoscio
Zakim IRC Bot: -BernadetteLoscio ←
13:15:25 <yaso1> ... I don't know if BernadetteLoscio has another comment, or if it is fine
... I don't know if BernadetteLoscio has another comment, or if it is fine ←
13:15:47 <yaso1> ... we closed a lot of the comments. Some are still open because people did not answered emails
... we closed a lot of the comments. Some are still open because people did not answered emails ←
13:16:01 <newton> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/?status=open&
Newton Calegari: http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/?status=open& ←
13:16:35 <yaso1> hadleybeeman: do you want to talk about the comments that are still open?
Hadley Beeman: do you want to talk about the comments that are still open? ←
13:16:55 <yaso1> newton: they are open because BernadetteLoscio have not a conclusion on that
Newton Calegari: they are open because BernadetteLoscio have not a conclusion on that ←
13:17:22 <yaso1> ... I think that the group must say if it is ok or not
... I think that the group must say if it is ok or not ←
13:18:08 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
13:18:19 <gatemezi> I see also that there are many comments from cgueret ...Maybe he can say something here
Ghislain Atemezing: I see also that there are many comments from cgueret ...Maybe he can say something here ←
13:18:19 <yaso1> newton: we need to ckech with BernadetteLoscio if it is right
Newton Calegari: we need to ckech with BernadetteLoscio if it is right ←
13:18:22 <BernadetteLoscio> zakim, ipcaller is BernadetteLoscio
Bernadette Farias Loscio: zakim, ipcaller is BernadetteLoscio ←
13:18:22 <Zakim> +BernadetteLoscio; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +BernadetteLoscio; got it ←
13:18:30 <yaso1> ... all of the comments of the community are answered
... all of the comments of the community are answered ←
13:19:01 <yaso1> hadleybeeman: talk about the comments that are still open
Hadley Beeman: talk about the comments that are still open ←
13:19:19 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: I'm not sure if the group wants to go comment on them
Bernadette Farias Loscio: I'm not sure if the group wants to go comment on them ←
13:19:26 <yaso1> yes
yes ←
13:19:54 <hadleybeeman> zakim, who is noisy?
Hadley Beeman: zakim, who is noisy? ←
13:19:57 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: some comments, they were considered in the document. Other ones were note considered
Bernadette Farias Loscio: some comments, they were considered in the document. Other ones were note considered ←
13:20:05 <Zakim> hadleybeeman, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: 10 (71%), PeterWinstanley (50%), BernadetteLoscio (36%)
Zakim IRC Bot: hadleybeeman, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: 10 (71%), PeterWinstanley (50%), BernadetteLoscio (36%) ←
13:20:16 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: i wrote note on each comments. I don't know if I can close them
Bernadette Farias Loscio: i wrote note on each comments. I don't know if I can close them ←
13:20:24 <hadleybeeman> zakim, who is here?
Hadley Beeman: zakim, who is here? ←
13:20:24 <Zakim> On the phone I see HadleyBeeman, Eric_Kauz, deirdrelee, newton, antoine, PeterWinstanley, yaso (muted), laufer (muted), riccardoAlbertoni, BernadetteLoscio
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see HadleyBeeman, Eric_Kauz, deirdrelee, newton, antoine, PeterWinstanley, yaso (muted), laufer (muted), riccardoAlbertoni, BernadetteLoscio ←
13:20:27 <yaso1> ... or if the group needs a resolution for them
... or if the group needs a resolution for them ←
13:20:27 <Zakim> On IRC I see MTCarrasco, gatemezi, cgueret, laufer, Makx, PeterWinstanley, antoine, yaso1, BernadetteLoscio, Eric_Kauz, riccardoAlbertoni, deirdrelee, Zakim, RRSAgent, newton,
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see MTCarrasco, gatemezi, cgueret, laufer, Makx, PeterWinstanley, antoine, yaso1, BernadetteLoscio, Eric_Kauz, riccardoAlbertoni, deirdrelee, Zakim, RRSAgent, newton, ←
13:20:27 <Zakim> ... rhiaro, hadleybeeman, trackbot
Zakim IRC Bot: ... rhiaro, hadleybeeman, trackbot ←
13:20:29 <Zakim> +??P2
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P2 ←
13:20:31 <hadleybeeman> zakim mute 10
Hadley Beeman: zakim mute 10 ←
13:20:45 <hadleybeeman> zakim, mute 10
Hadley Beeman: zakim, mute 10 ←
13:20:45 <Zakim> sorry, hadleybeeman, I do not know which phone connection belongs to 10
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, hadleybeeman, I do not know which phone connection belongs to 10 ←
13:20:48 <MTCarrasco> zakim, ??P2 is me
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: zakim, ??P2 is me ←
13:20:48 <Zakim> +MTCarrasco; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +MTCarrasco; got it ←
13:21:04 <yaso1> hadleybeeman: we need to have the resolution for each of the commenters
Hadley Beeman: we need to have the resolution for each of the commenters ←
13:21:43 <hadleybeeman> Zakim, who is noisy?
Hadley Beeman: Zakim, who is noisy? ←
13:21:43 <yaso1> ... what I think will be great is if we go thru each comment that is still open
... what I think will be great is if we go thru each comment that is still open ←
13:21:54 <Zakim> hadleybeeman, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: PeterWinstanley (100%), BernadetteLoscio (65%)
Zakim IRC Bot: hadleybeeman, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: PeterWinstanley (100%), BernadetteLoscio (65%) ←
13:22:03 <cgueret> gatemezi, I'm ok with all what Bernadette suggested by mail recently so we may be able to close many of those comments now
Christophe Gueret: gatemezi, I'm ok with all what Bernadette suggested by mail recently so we may be able to close many of those comments now ←
13:22:04 <hadleybeeman> zakim, mute PeterWinstanley
Hadley Beeman: zakim, mute PeterWinstanley ←
13:22:04 <Zakim> PeterWinstanley should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: PeterWinstanley should now be muted ←
13:22:11 <Zakim> -BernadetteLoscio
Zakim IRC Bot: -BernadetteLoscio ←
13:22:25 <BernadetteLoscio> im trying to say that we should see the comments
Bernadette Farias Loscio: im trying to say that we should see the comments ←
13:22:34 <gatemezi> cool then cgueret. That is more than 60% to close
Ghislain Atemezing: cool then cgueret. That is more than 60% to close ←
13:22:46 <cgueret> ;-)
Christophe Gueret: ;-) ←
13:22:53 <newton> https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3008
Newton Calegari: https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3008 ←
13:22:57 <yaso1> newton: if the group can check if it is ok or not, Ill send the link now
Newton Calegari: if the group can check if it is ok or not, Ill send the link now ←
13:23:06 <Zakim> +??P17
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P17 ←
13:23:10 <yaso1> hadleybeeman: the tracker says we have 12 open comments
Hadley Beeman: the tracker says we have 12 open comments ←
13:23:21 <BernadetteLoscio> zakim, ??P17 is BernadetteLoscio
Bernadette Farias Loscio: zakim, ??P17 is BernadetteLoscio ←
13:23:21 <Zakim> +BernadetteLoscio; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +BernadetteLoscio; got it ←
13:23:22 <yaso1> lots of noise
lots of noise ←
13:23:46 <yaso1> zakim, who is noisy?
zakim, who is noisy? ←
13:23:47 <hadleybeeman> Where are we on this comment? http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3028
Hadley Beeman: Where are we on this comment? http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3028 ←
13:24:03 <Zakim> yaso1, listening for 17 seconds I heard sound from the following: BernadetteLoscio (73%)
Zakim IRC Bot: yaso1, listening for 17 seconds I heard sound from the following: BernadetteLoscio (73%) ←
13:24:05 <MTCarrasco> very very noisy +1
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: very very noisy +1 ←
13:24:36 <BernadetteLoscio> yes
Bernadette Farias Loscio: yes ←
13:24:38 <BernadetteLoscio> you cant hear me
Bernadette Farias Loscio: you cant hear me ←
13:24:48 <BernadetteLoscio> sorry :(
Bernadette Farias Loscio: sorry :( ←
13:24:50 <yaso1> Berna: maybe you can write
Bernadette Farias Loscio: maybe you can write ←
13:24:51 <BernadetteLoscio> yes[
Bernadette Farias Loscio: yes[ ←
13:25:18 <yaso1> hadleybeeman: i was asking about the comments on IRC
Hadley Beeman: i was asking about the comments on IRC ←
13:25:18 <BernadetteLoscio> i sent a message to him with
Bernadette Farias Loscio: i sent a message to him with ←
13:25:27 <BernadetteLoscio> we dealt with this in the doc
Bernadette Farias Loscio: we dealt with this in the doc ←
13:25:34 <BernadetteLoscio> for me its ok
Bernadette Farias Loscio: for me its ok ←
13:25:38 <BernadetteLoscio> you could close
Bernadette Farias Loscio: you could close ←
13:25:48 <BernadetteLoscio> ok
Bernadette Farias Loscio: ok ←
13:26:13 <hadleybeeman> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3029
Hadley Beeman: http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3029 ←
13:26:33 <BernadetteLoscio> i wrote a note about that
Bernadette Farias Loscio: i wrote a note about that ←
13:26:36 <yaso1> \ too much noise
\ too much noise ←
13:26:48 <newton> Zakim, who's noisy?
Newton Calegari: Zakim, who's noisy? ←
13:27:02 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: I sent a message to him, for each comment
Bernadette Farias Loscio: I sent a message to him, for each comment ←
13:27:03 <Zakim> newton, listening for 15 seconds I heard sound from the following: HadleyBeeman (9%), BernadetteLoscio (90%)
Zakim IRC Bot: newton, listening for 15 seconds I heard sound from the following: HadleyBeeman (9%), BernadetteLoscio (90%) ←
13:27:23 <yaso1> for each comment I wrote a note, and he has not responded yet
for each comment I wrote a note, and he has not responded yet ←
13:27:38 <gatemezi> +1 on BernadetteLoscio note for that one
Ghislain Atemezing: +1 on BernadetteLoscio note for that one ←
13:27:54 <yaso1> hadleybeeman: if cgueret is happy with all of this comments
Hadley Beeman: if cgueret is happy with all of this comments ←
13:28:13 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: the 33, in my opinion, should be discussed in dq vocabulary
Bernadette Farias Loscio: the 33, in my opinion, should be discussed in dq vocabulary ←
13:28:45 <yaso1> hadleybeeman: your saying that it is not relevant for the BP doc, but it's useful for the vocabularies
Hadley Beeman: your saying that it is not relevant for the BP doc, but it's useful for the vocabularies ←
13:28:59 <newton> This one, for instance: http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3030
Newton Calegari: This one, for instance: http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3030 ←
13:29:12 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: I think that this is not something that we can use in the BP document, I think we have 3 or 4 comments like this one
Bernadette Farias Loscio: I think that this is not something that we can use in the BP document, I think we have 3 or 4 comments like this one ←
13:29:29 <cgueret> hadleybeeman, he is
Christophe Gueret: hadleybeeman, he is ←
13:29:52 <hadleybeeman> @cgueret Sorry, what do you mean?
Hadley Beeman: @cgueret Sorry, what do you mean? ←
13:30:08 <cgueret> you asked if I was happy with the comments ;-)
Christophe Gueret: you asked if I was happy with the comments ;-) ←
13:30:09 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: we have actions for this
Bernadette Farias Loscio: we have actions for this ←
13:30:21 <hadleybeeman> @cgueret I see. Thanks!
Hadley Beeman: @cgueret I see. Thanks! ←
13:30:22 <yaso1> ... we don't have the result yet
... we don't have the result yet ←
13:30:46 <cgueret> (I guess, not hearing what you say, just reading the notes...)
Christophe Gueret: (I guess, not hearing what you say, just reading the notes...) ←
13:31:01 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: the comment 30 and 31, it says that we should have a BP for versioning, and I answered that we have bps for this, but generic
Bernadette Farias Loscio: the comment 30 and 31, it says that we should have a BP for versioning, and I answered that we have bps for this, but generic ←
13:31:30 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: in this case, for example, we have the BP for versioning, but we don't have what he is asking
Bernadette Farias Loscio: in this case, for example, we have the BP for versioning, but we don't have what he is asking ←
13:31:41 <yaso1> hadleybeeman: ok, we need to have sure that he is ok with that
Hadley Beeman: ok, we need to have sure that he is ok with that ←
13:32:15 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: in some cases, the comments were added to the new version and in other cases I think that there is no way we can add the comments
Bernadette Farias Loscio: in some cases, the comments were added to the new version and in other cases I think that there is no way we can add the comments ←
13:32:47 <yaso1> hadleybeeman: we need to demonstrate that we took the comments serious, we have to present to the director of w3c all the comments and emails so that she or he can see
Hadley Beeman: we need to demonstrate that we took the comments serious, we have to present to the director of w3c all the comments and emails so that she or he can see ←
13:33:17 <yaso1> hadleybeeman: it sounds like you're making great progress, but we need to make sure that the comments were all properly attended
Hadley Beeman: it sounds like you're making great progress, but we need to make sure that the comments were all properly attended ←
13:33:33 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: It's ok, I understand, I'm learning
Bernadette Farias Loscio: It's ok, I understand, I'm learning ←
13:33:49 <yaso1> ... I agree and I fully understand that we need feedback
... I agree and I fully understand that we need feedback ←
13:34:07 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: we have other comments from cgueret
Bernadette Farias Loscio: we have other comments from cgueret ←
13:34:21 <yaso1> hadleybeeman: he said that he is happy :-)
Hadley Beeman: he said that he is happy :-) ←
13:34:27 <cgueret> :)
Christophe Gueret: :) ←
13:34:36 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: ok. And the other comments are from Andrea Perego
Bernadette Farias Loscio: ok. And the other comments are from Andrea Perego ←
13:35:21 <cgueret> We also had one from Herbert recently by mail, not sure that one has been captured in the tracker. But it may be already solved actually
Christophe Gueret: We also had one from Herbert recently by mail, not sure that one has been captured in the tracker. But it may be already solved actually ←
13:35:24 <yaso1> hadleybeeman: to Andrea comments, because we don't know if he is happy, I don't think we can close
Hadley Beeman: to Andrea comments, because we don't know if he is happy, I don't think we can close ←
13:35:43 <yaso1> ... so the comments should remain open, we can't close it
... so the comments should remain open, we can't close it ←
13:36:16 <yaso1> hadleybeeman: I think you should send another email to andrea asking if she is ok with that
Hadley Beeman: I think you should send another email to andrea asking if she is ok with that ←
13:36:42 <gatemezi> Should we keep track of "I am happy" from all the commenters?
Ghislain Atemezing: Should we keep track of "I am happy" from all the commenters? ←
13:36:47 <yaso1> ... we have to show that we tried to reach him. We can't ignore the comments..
... we have to show that we tried to reach him. We can't ignore the comments.. ←
13:36:58 <hadleybeeman> yes, gatemezi. We need to keep track of them
Hadley Beeman: yes, gatemezi. We need to keep track of them ←
13:37:11 <hadleybeeman> so we can show them to the Director at the Transition meeting.
Hadley Beeman: so we can show them to the Director at the Transition meeting. ←
13:37:14 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: in the last meeting, deirdre talked about the contents section
Bernadette Farias Loscio: in the last meeting, deirdre talked about the contents section ←
13:37:27 <gatemezi> Great! So cgueret should send an email for that?!
Ghislain Atemezing: Great! So cgueret should send an email for that?! ←
13:37:27 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: I was thinking on how to change it
Bernadette Farias Loscio: I was thinking on how to change it ←
13:37:48 <hadleybeeman> @gatemezi Yes, cgueret should send an email to say that his comments are resolved.
Hadley Beeman: @gatemezi Yes, cgueret should send an email to say that his comments are resolved. ←
13:38:05 <yaso1> ... I would like to discuss this section, I would like to discuss what needs to be changed
... I would like to discuss this section, I would like to discuss what needs to be changed ←
13:39:06 <yaso1> deirdrelee: the thing is
Deirdre Lee: the thing is ←
13:39:07 <cgueret> Is it ok if I comment back in the "proposed resolution" box of each comment ?
Christophe Gueret: Is it ok if I comment back in the "proposed resolution" box of each comment ? ←
13:39:45 <gatemezi> Not sure cgueret. You have access there as a member
Ghislain Atemezing: Not sure cgueret. You have access there as a member ←
13:39:54 <hadleybeeman> @cgueret Please do it in email, with the number of each comment in it — so we can have a URL to the email.
Hadley Beeman: @cgueret Please do it in email, with the number of each comment in it — so we can have a URL to the email. ←
13:39:56 <yaso1> ... in a w3c document it might be interpreted as if there was a relationship (sorry, deirdre, not sure if you said exactly that)
... in a w3c document it might be interpreted as if there was a relationship (sorry, deirdre, not sure if you said exactly that) ←
13:40:03 <cgueret> ok!
Christophe Gueret: ok! ←
13:40:26 <yaso1> q+
q+ ←
13:40:31 <yaso1> zakim, unmute me
zakim, unmute me ←
13:40:31 <Zakim> yaso should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: yaso should no longer be muted ←
13:40:41 <yaso1> q-
q- ←
13:41:12 <yaso1> zakim, unmute me
zakim, unmute me ←
13:41:12 <Zakim> yaso was not muted, yaso1
Zakim IRC Bot: yaso was not muted, yaso1 ←
13:41:21 <yaso1> you can hear me?
you can hear me? ←
13:41:38 <yaso1> zakim, unmute yaso1
zakim, unmute yaso1 ←
13:41:38 <Zakim> sorry, yaso1, I do not know which phone connection belongs to yaso1
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, yaso1, I do not know which phone connection belongs to yaso1 ←
13:41:45 <hadleybeeman> zakim, yaso is yaso1
Hadley Beeman: zakim, yaso is yaso1 ←
13:41:45 <Zakim> +yaso1; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +yaso1; got it ←
13:41:51 <hadleybeeman> zakim, unmute yaso1
Hadley Beeman: zakim, unmute yaso1 ←
13:41:51 <Zakim> yaso1 was not muted, hadleybeeman
Zakim IRC Bot: yaso1 was not muted, hadleybeeman ←
13:41:56 <yaso1> tks hadleybeeman
tks hadleybeeman ←
13:42:21 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: deirdrelee can you write, I did not understood
Bernadette Farias Loscio: deirdrelee can you write, I did not understood ←
13:42:25 <deirdrelee> what is the aim of context section? why focus on dataset versioning?
Deirdre Lee: what is the aim of context section? why focus on dataset versioning? ←
13:43:23 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: we talked about it. That is why I did it: to try to explain and keep a previous explanation on this
Bernadette Farias Loscio: we talked about it. That is why I did it: to try to explain and keep a previous explanation on this ←
13:43:42 <yaso1> ... this other one talks about distribution, so I think we should explain the idea
... this other one talks about distribution, so I think we should explain the idea ←
13:43:46 <Makx> just for info, inthe work on the European DCAT Application Profile we had a lot of discussion on this
Makx Dekkers: just for info, inthe work on the European DCAT Application Profile we had a lot of discussion on this ←
13:43:48 <yaso1> deirdrelee: that makes sense
Deirdre Lee: that makes sense ←
13:44:08 <hadleybeeman> zakim, who is here?
Hadley Beeman: zakim, who is here? ←
13:44:08 <Zakim> On the phone I see HadleyBeeman, Eric_Kauz, deirdrelee, newton, antoine, PeterWinstanley (muted), yaso1, laufer (muted), riccardoAlbertoni, MTCarrasco, BernadetteLoscio
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see HadleyBeeman, Eric_Kauz, deirdrelee, newton, antoine, PeterWinstanley (muted), yaso1, laufer (muted), riccardoAlbertoni, MTCarrasco, BernadetteLoscio ←
13:44:09 <Makx> and the content of the Context section might be very controversial
Makx Dekkers: and the content of the Context section might be very controversial ←
13:44:11 <Zakim> On IRC I see MTCarrasco, gatemezi, cgueret, laufer, Makx, PeterWinstanley, antoine, yaso1, BernadetteLoscio, Eric_Kauz, riccardoAlbertoni, deirdrelee, Zakim, RRSAgent, newton,
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see MTCarrasco, gatemezi, cgueret, laufer, Makx, PeterWinstanley, antoine, yaso1, BernadetteLoscio, Eric_Kauz, riccardoAlbertoni, deirdrelee, Zakim, RRSAgent, newton, ←
13:44:12 <Zakim> ... rhiaro, hadleybeeman, trackbot
Zakim IRC Bot: ... rhiaro, hadleybeeman, trackbot ←
13:44:43 <yaso1> zakim, mute yaso1
zakim, mute yaso1 ←
13:44:43 <Zakim> yaso1 should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: yaso1 should now be muted ←
13:44:46 <hadleybeeman> q?
Hadley Beeman: q? ←
13:44:57 <Makx> Some people think that time series are not versions but distributions
Makx Dekkers: Some people think that time series are not versions but distributions ←
13:45:14 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: it is not a formal model
Bernadette Farias Loscio: it is not a formal model ←
13:45:34 <Makx> and moreover, DCAT has no way to express relationsips between datasets
Makx Dekkers: and moreover, DCAT has no way to express relationsips between datasets ←
13:46:31 <hadleybeeman> Any other thoughts?
Hadley Beeman: Any other thoughts? ←
13:46:35 <hadleybeeman> (to the group)
Hadley Beeman: (to the group) ←
13:47:03 <Makx> what would you use to link Dataset001 to Dataset001_W1?
Makx Dekkers: what would you use to link Dataset001 to Dataset001_W1? ←
13:47:19 <Makx> Things like that may make the section controversial
Makx Dekkers: Things like that may make the section controversial ←
13:47:24 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: we need to talk about this. Even in DCAT we have a way to talk about this
Bernadette Farias Loscio: we need to talk about this. Even in DCAT we have a way to talk about this ←
13:47:40 <BernadetteLoscio> PAV ontology
Bernadette Farias Loscio: PAV ontology ←
13:47:48 <yaso1> ... so, Makx, Phil sent me a message with PAV ontology
... so, Makx, Phil sent me a message with PAV ontology ←
13:47:50 <cgueret> +1 to PAV
Christophe Gueret: +1 to PAV ←
13:48:01 <yaso1> ... so maybe we can use something like this
... so maybe we can use something like this ←
13:48:04 <cgueret> and Memento for those who like HTTP headers
Christophe Gueret: and Memento for those who like HTTP headers ←
13:48:15 <hadleybeeman> q?
Hadley Beeman: q? ←
13:48:33 <deirdrelee> There is an assumption in this diagram that the distribution is separate from version
Deirdre Lee: There is an assumption in this diagram that the distribution is separate from version ←
13:48:34 <cgueret> but we can just propose that as possible implementations, we don't have to recommend anything in particular
Christophe Gueret: but we can just propose that as possible implementations, we don't have to recommend anything in particular ←
13:48:58 <yaso1> hadleybeeman: I want to encourage the group to use the queue
Hadley Beeman: I want to encourage the group to use the queue ←
13:49:14 <gatemezi> Interesting! I am still confused where do we use the versioning: is it on the Dataset or on the Distribution?
Ghislain Atemezing: Interesting! I am still confused where do we use the versioning: is it on the Dataset or on the Distribution? ←
13:49:16 <Makx> OK sorry
Makx Dekkers: OK sorry ←
13:49:31 <Makx> +q
Makx Dekkers: +q ←
13:49:42 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: we can make this change. Im gonna work on this section about the content
Bernadette Farias Loscio: we can make this change. Im gonna work on this section about the content ←
13:49:46 <deirdrelee> i agree this is a really important issue. but I think if we say something in the bp doc on this, we should formally decide how to represent it
Deirdre Lee: i agree this is a really important issue. but I think if we say something in the bp doc on this, we should formally decide how to represent it ←
13:49:50 <hadleybeeman> q+ gatemezi to talk about where do we use the versioning: is it on the Dataset or on the Distribution?
Hadley Beeman: q+ gatemezi to talk about where do we use the versioning: is it on the Dataset or on the Distribution? ←
13:50:02 <yaso1> and if deirdrelee can review that would be great
and if deirdrelee can review that would be great ←
13:50:05 <hadleybeeman> ack makx
Hadley Beeman: ack makx ←
13:50:07 <BernadetteLoscio> http://pav-ontology.github.io/pav/
Bernadette Farias Loscio: http://pav-ontology.github.io/pav/ ←
13:50:10 <yaso1> Makx: are you on the call or just irc?
Makx Dekkers: are you on the call or just irc? ←
13:50:37 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
13:50:54 <Makx> zaki, IPcaller is me
Makx Dekkers: zaki, IPcaller is me ←
13:51:03 <deirdrelee> q+
Deirdre Lee: q+ ←
13:51:05 <Makx> zakim, IPcaller is me
Makx Dekkers: zakim, IPcaller is me ←
13:51:05 <Zakim> +Makx; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +Makx; got it ←
13:51:16 <hadleybeeman> <gatemezi> Interesting! I am still confused where do we use the versioning: is it on the Dataset or on the Distribution?
Hadley Beeman: <gatemezi> Interesting! I am still confused where do we use the versioning: is it on the Dataset or on the Distribution? ←
13:51:22 <Makx> +q
Makx Dekkers: +q ←
13:51:23 <BernadetteLoscio> Dataset!
Bernadette Farias Loscio: Dataset! ←
13:51:37 <hadleybeeman> ack gatemezi
Hadley Beeman: ack gatemezi ←
13:51:38 <Zakim> gatemezi, you wanted to talk about where do we use the versioning: is it on the Dataset or on the Distribution?
Zakim IRC Bot: gatemezi, you wanted to talk about where do we use the versioning: is it on the Dataset or on the Distribution? ←
13:51:41 <hadleybeeman> ack d
Hadley Beeman: ack d ←
13:52:47 <MTCarrasco> q+
13:53:08 <hadleybeeman> ack m
Hadley Beeman: ack m ←
13:53:20 <hadleybeeman> q+ mtc
Hadley Beeman: q+ mtc ←
13:53:26 <hadleybeeman> q+ MTCarrasco
Hadley Beeman: q+ MTCarrasco ←
13:53:30 <hadleybeeman> q- mtc
Hadley Beeman: q- mtc ←
13:53:33 <hadleybeeman> ack makx
Hadley Beeman: ack makx ←
13:53:33 <yaso1> Makx: we have actually tried
Makx Dekkers: we have actually tried ←
13:53:42 <deirdrelee> hi antoine, it's because of the context sectionin bp doc that uses distributions vs versioning example
Deirdre Lee: hi antoine, it's because of the context sectionin bp doc that uses distributions vs versioning example ←
13:54:01 <yaso1> ... what the BP document calls versioning is not versioning
... what the BP document calls versioning is not versioning ←
13:54:58 <hadleybeeman> makx: It comes down to: what is the relationship between datasets?
Makx Dekkers: It comes down to: what is the relationship between datasets? [ Scribe Assist by Hadley Beeman ] ←
13:55:16 <BernadetteLoscio> thanks Makx!
Bernadette Farias Loscio: thanks Makx! ←
13:55:16 <yaso1> Makx: I can assure you that it is no going to be an easy discussion
Makx Dekkers: I can assure you that it is no going to be an easy discussion ←
13:55:21 <hadleybeeman> ack mt
Hadley Beeman: ack mt ←
13:55:24 <deirdrelee> antoine, that would be the easy answer alright :) but then maybe people are still confused how to describe time series...
Deirdre Lee: antoine, that would be the easy answer alright :) but then maybe people are still confused how to describe time series... ←
13:55:39 <BernadetteLoscio> q+
Bernadette Farias Loscio: q+ ←
13:55:49 <Makx> +1 to Carrasco to clearly define the words
Makx Dekkers: +1 to Carrasco to clearly define the words ←
13:56:02 <gatemezi> Clear definition somewhere in the glossary might help the readers
Ghislain Atemezing: Clear definition somewhere in the glossary might help the readers ←
13:56:04 <antoine> deirdrelee: why having to describe this in an otherwise general BP document? The level is just not the same.
Deirdre Lee: why having to describe this in an otherwise general BP document? The level is just not the same. [ Scribe Assist by Antoine Isaac ] ←
13:56:32 <hadleybeeman> ack b
Hadley Beeman: ack b ←
13:56:33 <yaso1> MTCarrasco: the mininum we need is clear definition on the words that we use
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: the mininum we need is clear definition on the words that we use ←
13:56:45 <deirdrelee> under which BP? versioning? or new one?
Deirdre Lee: under which BP? versioning? or new one? ←
13:56:48 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: Im not triong to propose a formal presentation for this
Bernadette Farias Loscio: Im not trying to propose a formal presentation for this ←
13:56:59 <yaso1> s/triong/trying
13:57:26 <Makx> +q
Makx Dekkers: +q ←
13:57:28 <deirdrelee> ...or under BP 25 Provide real-time access..
Deirdre Lee: ...or under BP 25 Provide real-time access.. ←
13:57:37 <yaso1> BernadetteLoscio: we can remove the content section, but the problem remains, because it is not clear what is a version, what is a ditribution
Bernadette Farias Loscio: we can remove the content section, but the problem remains, because it is not clear what is a version, what is a ditribution ←
13:57:42 <deirdrelee> q+
Deirdre Lee: q+ ←
13:57:51 <yaso1> .. we dont know what is the meaning of this words
.. we dont know what is the meaning of this words ←
13:57:52 <antoine> deirdrelee: I meant, the BP doc in general does not make so specific recommendations, in general
Deirdre Lee: I meant, the BP doc in general does not make so specific recommendations, in general [ Scribe Assist by Antoine Isaac ] ←
13:57:54 <hadleybeeman> ack makx
Hadley Beeman: ack makx ←
13:57:58 <hadleybeeman> zakim, close the queue
Hadley Beeman: zakim, close the queue ←
13:57:58 <Zakim> ok, hadleybeeman, the speaker queue is closed
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, hadleybeeman, the speaker queue is closed ←
13:58:05 <yaso1> ... for now, we can remove, but the problem remains
... for now, we can remove, but the problem remains ←
13:58:21 <yaso1> Makx: I would suggest to keep it there
Makx Dekkers: I would suggest to keep it there ←
13:58:33 <hadleybeeman> ack deirdre
Hadley Beeman: ack deirdre ←
13:58:36 <yaso1> +1 to Makx
+1 to Makx ←
13:58:42 <Makx> it'll raise comments for sure
Makx Dekkers: it'll raise comments for sure ←
13:58:52 <hadleybeeman> zakim, who is noisy?
Hadley Beeman: zakim, who is noisy? ←
13:59:06 <Zakim> hadleybeeman, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: BernadetteLoscio (15%)
Zakim IRC Bot: hadleybeeman, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: BernadetteLoscio (15%) ←
13:59:21 <riccardoAlbertoni> +1 to Makx
Riccardo Albertoni: +1 to Makx ←
13:59:33 <MTCarrasco> The general sound quality in this call is really bad
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: The general sound quality in this call is really bad ←
13:59:46 <Makx> no please leave it there!
Makx Dekkers: no please leave it there! ←
14:00:01 <yaso1> hadleybeeman: Makx is suggesting that you leave it there
Hadley Beeman: Makx is suggesting that you leave it there ←
14:00:20 <deirdrelee> q+ to ask if we vote on bp next week?
Deirdre Lee: q+ to ask if we vote on bp next week? ←
14:00:24 <yaso1> ... so we can get responses from the outside world, but you are the editor, so it is your decision
... so we can get responses from the outside world, but you are the editor, so it is your decision ←
14:00:26 <Zakim> -Eric_Kauz
Zakim IRC Bot: -Eric_Kauz ←
14:00:28 <BernadetteLoscio> Thank you!!!
Bernadette Farias Loscio: Thank you!!! ←
14:00:31 <Zakim> -Makx
Zakim IRC Bot: -Makx ←
14:00:35 <MTCarrasco> bye
Manuel Carrasco Benitez: bye ←
14:00:37 <yaso1> hadleybeeman: we should vote on BO next week
Hadley Beeman: we should vote on BP next week ←
14:00:39 <Zakim> -MTCarrasco
Zakim IRC Bot: -MTCarrasco ←
14:00:41 <gatemezi> Thanks all. bye!
Ghislain Atemezing: Thanks all. bye! ←
14:00:42 <yaso1> s/BO/BP
14:00:45 <PeterWinstanley> bye
Peter Winstanley: bye ←
14:00:48 <laufer> bye all, nice wknd
Carlos Laufer: bye all, nice wknd ←
14:00:50 <yaso1> Bye all! Thanks :-)
Bye all! Thanks :-) ←
14:00:52 <riccardoAlbertoni> Thanks.. bye!
Riccardo Albertoni: Thanks.. bye! ←
14:00:52 <Zakim> -antoine
Zakim IRC Bot: -antoine ←
14:00:54 <Zakim> -yaso1
Zakim IRC Bot: -yaso1 ←
14:00:59 <Zakim> -HadleyBeeman
Zakim IRC Bot: -HadleyBeeman ←
14:01:01 <Zakim> -laufer
Zakim IRC Bot: -laufer ←
14:01:02 <BernadetteLoscio> bye!
Bernadette Farias Loscio: bye! ←
14:01:09 <Zakim> -deirdrelee
Zakim IRC Bot: -deirdrelee ←
14:01:14 <Zakim> -riccardoAlbertoni
Zakim IRC Bot: -riccardoAlbertoni ←
14:01:24 <Zakim> -BernadetteLoscio
Zakim IRC Bot: -BernadetteLoscio ←
14:01:31 <Zakim> -PeterWinstanley
Zakim IRC Bot: -PeterWinstanley ←
14:06:30 <Zakim> disconnecting the lone participant, newton, in DATA_DWBP()9:00AM
Zakim IRC Bot: disconnecting the lone participant, newton, in DATA_DWBP()9:00AM ←
14:06:31 <Zakim> DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has ended ←
14:06:31 <Zakim> Attendees were HadleyBeeman, riccardoAlbertoni, +1.609.557.aabb, deirdrelee, newton, antoine, Eric_Kauz, PeterWinstanley, BernadetteLoscio, laufer, MTCarrasco, yaso1, Makx
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were HadleyBeeman, riccardoAlbertoni, +1.609.557.aabb, deirdrelee, newton, antoine, Eric_Kauz, PeterWinstanley, BernadetteLoscio, laufer, MTCarrasco, yaso1, Makx ←
Formatted by CommonScribe