W3C

- DRAFT -

WebFonts Working Group Teleconference

20 Nov 2013

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Vlad, [Microsoft], +1.650.214.aaaa, Andrew_Kirkpatrick, jfkthame, +1.250.668.aabb
Regrets
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
cslye

Contents


<trackbot> Date: 20 November 2013

<Vlad> scribe: cslye

kuettel: Updates from Google

<scribe> New Brotli version pushed out.

and WOFF2 tools

Asking about interest in re-running compression tests for stats.

<kuettel> Link to the Font Compression Reference project with the new conversion tool with Brotli:

<kuettel> https://code.google.com/p/font-compression-reference/

kuettel: Will post new instructions for tools.

Now changed from Java to C++

Vlad: TPAC news...

Spoke of involving Larry Masinter of Adobe.

about media types.

Vlad spoke informally to Larry.

Larry asks what we want to get out of a new media type.

How far we get is dependent on how we answer the question.

Getting a good story together is the first important task.

Vlad: Plan to use new compression technology in WOFF2, IETF might be a good place to put it.

IETF is maybe not a good place for a standards track document.

Lack of compression experts or other interest there might be bad for it.

ISO might be better?

Where do most compression standards exist?

ZLIP Compressed Data format is IETF.

<jfkthame> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1950

Spec there is "information only".

ZLIB seems legitimate enough, so it just depends on people being comfortable with IETF as a vehicle.

If it starts as info only, it could move to standards track later.

Vlad: The lack of process complexity makes it easier to publish.

jfkthame: More formal process might help with comfort around patents.

Vlad: ISO has experts which will better-vet the technology and IP.

cslye: How do we decide which avenue to take?

Vlad: Best that WG members talk to colleagues and bring back an opinion/preference.
... will check with Chris L.

jfkthame: What's the best ISO channel?

Vlad: MPEG committee. Knows compression.

Some overlap between MPEG and JPEG committees.

jfkthame: Less experience with lossless compression?

Vlad: Not a big deal. One stage of larger compression picture.
... No urgent need to decide. Just something to think about and discuss.
... Did Google have any advice for IETF?

kuettel: Nothing yet. Maybe next week.
... Might have an update in two weeks.

John_Hudson: Size specific design selection, related to web/CSS...

Microsoft published OS/2 proposal.

jfkthame: Probably best discussed in CSS WG.

Vlad: Should we have a call on the 27th?

No interest. Will cancel call.

Vlad: Would like to see more activity on the email list.

cslye: Bram Stein from Adobe Typekit is now WG member.

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.138 (CVS log)
$Date: 2013/11/20 22:15:35 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138  of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: cslye
Inferring ScribeNick: cslye

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.

Default Present: Vlad, [Microsoft], +1.650.214.aaaa, Andrew_Kirkpatrick, jfkthame, +1.250.668.aabb
Present: Vlad [Microsoft] +1.650.214.aaaa Andrew_Kirkpatrick jfkthame +1.250.668.aabb

WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Found Date: 20 Nov 2013
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2013/11/20-webfonts-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]