See also: IRC log
SH: e-learning symposium first
Justin: we have got 7 - 8 papers
SAZ: the reviewer should start reviewing
<silvia_mirri> After the meeting I'm going to assign papers to reviewers
SH: this a template for accessibility accreditation
<sharper_> http://goo.gl/OACzpz
<Vivienne> its fine. You have to scroll down to the link to the template
Klaus: we shoudl keep it readable and
managable
... author and co-author are there. Not sure if we shoudl give refrence to
RDWG groupe
... if this is okay, we can start then start defining examples filing the
template
<shadi> +1 -- author is RDWG
Vivienne: the template is helpful. may be te editor(s) instead of the author
<shadi> [contact could be RDWG list too]
contact: road map and goal may be the same. We should think about merging the two
SAZ: I agree the author is RDWG, so add
editor(s). Contact to RDWG
... change problem to challenges. road map is too loaded word, Merge goals and
road map to future directions
<Justin> +1
ยด+1
<Vivienne> +1
<klaus> +1
<Peter_Thiessen> +1
<sharper_> +1
<Peter_Thiessen> (Agree with Shadi's comments also)
<annika> +1
<shadi> +1
<klaus> +1
<Vivienne> and take out the wording for 'road map'
<Justin> +1
<sharper_> +1
<annika> +1
<Vivienne> +1
+1
<sharper_> RESOLVED: change problem to challenges. road map is too loaded word, Merge goals and road map to future directions
<silvia_mirri> +1
<sharper_> RESOLVED: Change Authors to Editors
<Vivienne> sure will do
<klaus> yes!
<sharper_> http://goo.gl/MLs83m
<sharper_> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-rd/2013Nov/0035.html
<sharper_> http://goo.gl/oi81LD
Vivienne: I have done a summary, I am wondering about the links I got, where to put them. I can put as well David's comment sent today
<klaus> sorry but have to leave early today to catch a train - bye
SH: you need feedback on the length and content. I suggest to send a survey to the groupe
Vivienne: I want to make some canges beyond the resolution we made last time
SAZ: This a write up of the discussion. What is the intent, I tink it was to create a catalouge item
SH: the summerisation is the result which is useful for future work, but not te full transcript
SAZ: we are using this topic to learn.
... the discssion helps to create the catalouge item(s). We should not refer
to the discussion telco we had in September
... We should try to look to te broader work and not to the discussion, which
has no stand in W3C means
<Zakim> shadi, you wanted to talk about referencing the discussion rather than making it the center piece and to react on "ivory tower" statement
Annika: agree to Shadi's comment. We should get rid of the style of meeting's minutes
SH: if we do not tell about the discussion could confuse people
Vivienne: I conclude I will rewrite the item. This will be public and everybody can contribute. I make it as a sumary of a topic rather than a discussion/ meeting
SAZ: I agree it should be short. The language is earher narrative, it should be cleaned up with short sentences / pargraphs
Vivienne: The summary will refelct the groupe consensus
SAZ: phone calls is an instruments to create common understanding within the group