See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 08 October 2013
<paulc> trackbot, start meeting
<trackbot> Meeting: HTML Media Task Force Teleconference
<trackbot> Date: 08 October 2013
<paulc> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2013Oct/0011.html
<paulc> Scribe?
<scribe> scribenick: adrianba
<scribe> scribe: Adrian Bateman
paulc: done
<paulc> http://www.w3.org/2013/09/24-html-media-minutes.html
paulc: there was some concern about minutes been generated - wasn't sent to the list but was created
johnsim: i was talking about last week's EME call
paulc: we'll take that offline
<paulc> EME minutes: http://www.w3.org/2013/10/01-html-media-minutes.html
paulc: hand-crafted the link
<igarashi> +Tasuya_Igarashi
johnsim: okay, thanks
MSE-related actions are given below.
paulc: last call closes in ~9
days
... did ask the a11y TF if they were aware of this
... may be on their call this week to discuss
... that's the only place i've evangelised the spec
... as of last night we have 3 bugs (in the agenda)
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22432
<paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22432#c2
paulc: this is assigned - current comment from this morning - original correspondent suggests this is invalid
acolwell: fine with marking as invalid - can do so right now
adrianba: not sure if it is true that there is no possible race?
acolwell: step 3 of the
appendbuffer algorithm says to add buffer to end of input
buffer
... and i think he is interpreting this as a synchronous
copy
<igarashi> list attendees
acolwell: there's no opportunity
for there to be a race because it is copied inside the
appendbuffer call
... if it was a reference then there could be a race
paulc: we should mark this invalid - adrianba can file a new bug if there is something else that needs clarifying
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23169
<paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23169
paulc: this was accompanied by mail from dsinger
<paulc> last meeting discussion: http://www.w3.org/2013/09/24-html-media-minutes.html#item07
paulc: here's the reference to
the minutes from last meeting
... status hasn't changed
... mark, do you have comments?
markw: yes, i can do look at that
paulc: mark is going to take a
look at this
... mark if you can respond on the bug or email and make sure
dsinger is prompted
markw: ok
<paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23441
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23441
paulc: this one is new - created
after the last meeting
... have you done anything on this?
acolwell: i'm looking for an
example of something to use as a starting point
... how do we do this elsewhere?
paulc: didn't we decide to do this for EME CDMs?
glenn: i proposed something for this in the wiki
paulc: at a minimum that would be
a place to start
... if people don't like that then they can discuss what else
to do
acolwell: i was also trying to
draft advice about how to write a format up
... to try to get consensus on what this should be
... will draft something up
... wanted a bug to track so we don't forget it
paulc: if glenn will give us the link - is it handy?
glenn: will add it momentarily
<glenn> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/KeySystemRegistry
paulc: could you put the link
into the bug?
... i think we're done for today - when we meet in two weeks LC
will have closed by then so one of the topics will be how to
move forward
<joesteele> bug link?
paulc: my experience is that LC
comments peak on the last day
... any other comments or topics?
acolwell: what is the process after LC?
paulc: i haven't had time to do
this but given the small number of comments we're going to want
to produce a LC disposition
... should be easy by going through the bugs and communicating
with people on each one
... then we start talking about going into CR
... you transition into LC without the Director but to get out
of LC and into CR then we have to get permission from the
Director
... we will want to describe the CR exit critera
... any features to be marked at risk
... and how long we expect CR to last
... at the next meeting we should focus on LC bugs first
... and then maybe have an agenda item after to discuss the CR
items i just listed
... we could queue up an email discussion too
acolwell: do we need a CfC to exit LC?
paulc: we'll have to produce a
candidate CR document including features at risk, exit
criteria, and minimum period
... we also need a comments disposition
... we'll take this to the WG - don't expect concerns
... once we have the TF and WG consensus then i request
audience with the Director
... to ask to move to CR
... typically for complex documents you might have a telcon
with some combination of the chairs, Team contact, and editors
to answer questions about how you disposed of LC comments
... and to see if he agrees with entrance and exit
criteria
... fair question - should start an email discussion after LC
closes
paulc: adjourned
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s|this/|this?| Found ScribeNick: adrianba Found Scribe: Adrian Bateman Default Present: +1.417.671.aaaa, glenn, markw, paulc, +1.303.661.aabb, kkershaw, adrianba, +44.303.040.aacc, pal, Aaron_Colwell, joesteele, davide, johnsim, +1.613.287.aadd, MartinSoukup, igarashi, [Microsoft] Present: +1.417.671.aaaa glenn markw paulc +1.303.661.aabb kkershaw adrianba +44.303.040.aacc pal Aaron_Colwell joesteele davide johnsim +1.613.287.aadd MartinSoukup igarashi [Microsoft] Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2013Oct/0011.html Found Date: 08 Oct 2013 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2013/10/08-html-media-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]