See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 12 September 2013
<scribe> scribe: krisk
<paulc> plh beats paulc
none
none
none
<paulc> rubys: Are you joining us?
SUBTOPIC: CfC: Approve overview of Canvas testing in view of permissive CR exit criteria, closed Sept 4
see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Jul/0032.html
paulc: note that we have two of
them and the closed Sept 4th
... co-chairs needs to meet and discuss both of these two
outstanding items
Item #1 Extension
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Jul/0043.html
http://www.w3.org/2013/08/15-html-wg-minutes.html#item06
Item #2 Update
CfC: Approve overview of testing in view of permissive CR exit, closed Sep 4
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Jun/0033.html
Extension:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Jul/0042.html
http://www.w3.org/2013/08/15-html-wg-minutes.html#item06
<paulc> WG Decisions on both of these CfCs are pending. In the Chairs input queue.
<paulc> We are still waiting on EME and Polyglot Candidate heartbeat Working Drafts from the respective Editors.
paulc: the first is for EME and the next is Polyglot
EME and Polyglot: We are still waiting on EME and Polyglot Candidate heartbeat Working Drafts from the respective Editors.
For EME the editor has been family illness and has been out of the office
For polygot the editor has asked the co-chairs some questions
paulc: for polygot we have zero bugs
<paulc> Polyglot bugs are at zero: http://intertwingly.net/tmp/wgtrends.cgi#html-xhtml-compatibility-authoring-guide
Eliot: The editors are working to compete this and get a candidate working draft and publish this as a heardbeat
paulc: One the document has been published the co-chairs will start to bring the question to the working group on normativity of the document
Next Still waiting for feedback from PF re: WAI-ARIA in HTML:
paulc: This document was almost published but it was blocked because we are waiting for concensus from PF
http://www.w3.org/2013/09/05-html-a11y-minutes.html#item02
paulc: Let me help here
... see the minutes from last week (just above)
<paulc> http://www.w3.org/TR/aria-in-html/
<paulc> What was published this week is: http://www.w3.org/TR/html-aapi/
<paulc> Title: HTML to Platform Accessibility APIs Implementation Guide
paulc: The task force needs to take note of publications
<paulc> See bug on status section on https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23209
<paulc> PF WG will run a CfC to permi the publication of Using ARIA
janina: I'm sorry and we'll get this done so that PF can permit publication using ARIA
Next Last Call WD: Media Source Extensions published on Sep 5
see http://www.w3.org/News/2013#entry-9930
paulc: Has the accessibility task force looked into MSE?
janina: Yes we are aware of this and are tracking this work
<paulc> Heartbeat WD: HTML to Platform Accessibility APIs Implementation Guide published on Sep 10
The next agenda item was discussed above
<paulc> See above discussion.
SUBTOPIC:
We met on #testing this week as planned
The discussion was really about TPAC and who is planning on attending
A TTWF event will be occuring at this time and they are looking for some people to potentially give a talk and/or help
Ideally the person can give a talk in Chinese
<paulc> TTWF is on Sat before TPAC week in Shenzen
James Graham will be attending
<paulc> TTWF: http://testthewebforward.org/#
paulc: The chairs may be asking about how the TTF can help with the Canvas Document
krisk: OK
paulc: We suspect is that we have areas of the spec that are at RISK and the features are accessibility related
janina: I believe we are OK
paulc: The spec could move
forward by removing the at risk features
... The process would be to delete from 5.0 and then added to
5.1
... Leaving them in 5.1 (v2) would allow implementation
time
SUBTOPIC: Accessibility Task Force
paulc: any items to add?
janina: Testing has started (not
complete) for implementations
... We are working on how to publish/process comments we have
recieved
janins: We have a few bugs on 'alt' in html 5.0
janina: we think we can be done with 'alt' bugs in weeks (not months)
paulc: Their are zero bugs on image description?
janina: We are handling them in tracker and not bugzilla
paulc: We need to have them in
bugzilla and I though this was agreed upon last week
... Can you give me a link?
janina: I'll need some more time
<paulc> May be member-only: https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/44061/WD-html-longdesc-20130716/
paulc: I found the link - though it's member only which should not be the case
krisk: I also get prompted
paulc: Looks like we have 3 comments?
janina: We have 5 actually
SUBTOPIC: Media Task Force
The TF has worked on EME during the last month
paulc: we have not made alot of
progress on bugs
... one of the editors have been out of the office, though we
are looking to publish a heartbeat next week
... We do have some last call MSE bugs which means we'll go
back to work on the MSE spec
... once these are done we'll work on the EME spec
<paulc> EME status: http://intertwingly.net/tmp/wgtrends.cgi#encrypted-media-extensions
paulc: any questions for the task
forces?
... none
http://www.w3.org/2013/11/TPAC/
HTML WG meets on Thurs/Friday
paulc: 33 people have registers
with about 40 observers
... Registration ends on Oct 18th
<plh> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2013Sep/0004.html
plh: The web performance group wants to meet at the event (one hour?)
<paulc> Wiki agenda page: http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/wg/2013-11-Agenda
paulc: please add this the wiki
(other agenda items as well)
... what is the specific topic?
<paulc> timing: 02:30 PM - 04:00 PM: HTML5 Working Group visit
plh: Resource priority and pre-rendering
<paulc> on thursday Nov 14
plh: What parts should be in HTML vs the web performance wg
paulc: It sounds like an
extension spec?
... why would it not just be in their spec?
plh: Some people think the extension would be better in the HTML spec
paulc: Is this a quality of the spec issue?
plh: We want to first talk about the attributes and then figure where they are best to be located
rubys: We have tried really hard to make sure that attributes that are not in HTML are not second class citizens
paulc: should a co-chair attend a
web perf meeting?
... Please tell web perf to discuss this friday morning -
ok?
plh: sure
paulc: Many people may needs a
visa and the registration page information about getting a
'invitation letter'
... We were holding off on publish until the recent meeting in
France
... so we should process the bugs and work on publishing the
document
<paulc> Adaptive image spec bugs: http://intertwingly.net/tmp/wgtrends.cgi#adaptive-image-element
paulc: plh it seems we need to
have an agenda item to discuss this two features
... any other items to discuss?
... none
... I can c-chair next week
krisk I can scribe
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/EME/MSE/ Succeeded: s/no second/not second/ Found Scribe: krisk Inferring ScribeNick: krisk WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: CfC Clarke CyrilRa Daniel_Austin Eliot Extension Lachy Microsoft P2 SUBTOPIC Sam TTWF Title aa aaaa aabb aacc aadd cabanier darobin dio html-wg janina janins jaymunro joined krisk paulc pladd plh rubys timing trackbot You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-announce/2013JulSep/0023.html Found Date: 12 Sep 2013 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2013/09/12-html-wg-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]