See also: IRC log
<scribe> Scribe: Jan
JS: No new news...still waiting
for feedback from some groups before sending to AC
... Concers?
All: None
JS: Judy has accepted the exit
criteria...
... Have not yet had chance to meet with people from w3m
... We need to have a resolution to go to CR
... I also need to explain how SC changes aren't
substantive...but 3 actually are
JT: Any concerns with "If changes are deemed to be substantial, the working group agrees to publish another working draft of ATAG 2.0 with the shortest allowed timeframe for comments."
JR: No objections
JT: No objects heard
Resolved: If changes are deemed to be substantial, the working group agrees to publish another working draft of ATAG 2.0 with the shortest allowed timeframe for comments.
JT: Next steps Jeanne?
JS: The only problem I expect is
with re: to the "substantial changes"
... I have been working on a package of info
... Then I'm working on requirements .... back when we started
there was no requirements for requirements
... Evidence of wide review...should be ok\
... Evidence of issues being addressed
... Objections...none
... Implementations...JR's document
... And patent disclosure...none
JT: How do we address?
JS: Is working on it... I'm tying to bring in items from other WAI groups.
JT: So we have a way forward?
JS: Yes, will let you know.
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130807/
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130807/results
JT: All ok
Resolved: All agree to remove must from the principles
<jeanne> B.3.1.2 Help Authors Decide: If the authoring tool provides *accessibility checking* that relies on authors to decide whether potential web content accessibility problems (WCAG) are correctly identified (i.e., manual checking and semi-automated checking), then the checker provides instructions that describe how to decide. (Level A)
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/ED-ATAG20-20130627/#def-Checking
<AlastairC> last section: "instructions are provided as part of the authoring tool interface that describe how to decide."
<scribe> ACTION: JS to Remove "An authoring tool may support any combination of checking types." from the bullets [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/12-au-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-389 - Remove "an authoring tool may support any combination of checking types." from the bullets [on Jeanne F Spellman - due 2013-08-19].
B.3.1.2 Help Authors Decide: If the authoring tool provides *accessibility checking* that relies on authors to decide whether potential web content accessibility problems (WCAG) are correctly identified (i.e., manual checking and semi-automated checking), then the authoring tool provides instructions that describe how to decide. (Level A)
JT: B.3.1.2 Help Authors Decide:
If the authoring tool provides *accessibility checking* that
relies on authors to decide whether potential web content
accessibility problems (WCAG) are correctly identified (i.e.,
manual checking and semi-automated checking), then the
accessibility checking process provides instructions that
describe how to decide. (Level A)
... Any objections...
AL: Don't hear problems
Resolved: B.3.1.2 Help Authors Decide: If the authoring tool provides *accessibility checking* that relies on authors to decide whether potential web content accessibility problems (WCAG) are correctly identified (i.e., manual checking and semi-automated checking), then the accessibility checking process provides instructions that describe how to decide. (Level A)
TB: Getting some support on this internally
JT: OERPUB update... more accessibility prompting in the Sept release
JR: Looked at Pinterest...does prompting
JT: Also spoke to people in
DAISY...EPub3 authorong enviornments...
... ... will include many ATAG prompting featrues
... DAISY will be publishing a list
... Any other implementatipn updates?
None heard
JT: Status updates?
AC: New Tiny MCE?
JT: JR can you and GG take a look?
JR: Word on EasyChirp?
TB: Haven't heard anything
<AlastairC> Update http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/dlembree/easy-chirp-2-contribute-to-an-inclusive-twittersph/posts/547644
JT: Continue monitoring
JR: Still looking for accessible IDEs
JT: we are at end of time?
... Other issues.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: Jan Inferring ScribeNick: Jan Default Present: Jeanne, Jan, Alastair, Tom, Alex, Jutta, Tim_Boland Present: Jeanne Jan Alastair Tom Alex Jutta Tim_Boland Regrets: Tim B. (partial) WARNING: No meeting title found! You should specify the meeting title like this: <dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2013JulSep/0022.html Got date from IRC log name: 12 Aug 2013 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2013/08/12-au-minutes.html People with action items: js WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]