See also: IRC log
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2013Jun/0016.html
Please review for any remaining issues
CV: waiting for scenario from Samuel
... scenario from Emmanuelle not very clear
SM: mail seems lost
... will resend to the list
SAZ: always good to CC the list
... in case someone else has comments
... and to archive the message
... what is unclear about Emmanuelle's scenario
CV: discussed last call, she said she would rework it
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/WD-AERT/ED-AERT
"Guidance on the development of web accessibility evaluation tools"
CV: some parts from the requirements document
... like introduction and the overall structure
... started with one feature for discussion
... to see if that is the depth we want
SM: need more detail about the types of markup languages, how they can be parsed, etc
CV: if we go into that depth than we design the tools
SM: model for XML is different to HTML5 for
example
... impacts tool development
SAZ: think the individual paragraphs seem too
long and wordy
... but the categories could be expanded
... to include specific formats that are commonly used
... for example HTML4, HTML5, JavaScript, CSS2, CSS3, SVG, and PDF
CV: SMIL
SM: Flash
SAZ: WAI-ARIA
... and a generic "other formats"
... same issue with second feature
... all content there but too wordy
... also not clear what parts of this section are individual "sub-features"
10 July 2013