See also: IRC log
<Jan> Scribe: Jan
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2013AprJun/0064.html
JS: Please add reviewing exit criteria
<jeanne> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/draft_auwg_charter.html
JS: Latest charter is finished
the amount of process Jeanne is involved with.
... it is now headed to W3M
... From within WAI, we are one of 2 that is done
... If charter is out for review by end of June, charter should
be exteneded
JS: Don't want this page to be
discoverable yet
... Starts with status
... Next section is exit criteria
... We have been stuck on 13 ATAG SCs that depend for their
level on WCAG
... But we will pick that up in a minute.
... The point here is that as we go into CR, we give criteria
for when we know we're done and can become a full rec
... Reads the document...
JR: Only 2 seems like significant change
JR, JS: Discuss ...
JS: If group is ok with this, I'd like to advance this...
JR: Remove second (6) and remove erroneous extra paragraph at the bottom.
AL: Seeing it for the first time, I'd rather think about it
JT: Do you see something?
AL: Not from the call, but I'd like to have a bit more time
JS: Could you have the answer tomorrow?
AL: That quick?
JS: Yes, we had set a schedule to have exit criteria by this friday
AL: I won't stand in the way
JT: Any other suggested edits, concerns?
AC: "capable of passing 2 WCAG success criteria" where did the 2 come from?
JS: 2 is kind of a random
choice...a small number but not all
... In range of small to all, W3C usually chooses 2
AC: OK, not objection
JS: Key is that it needs to be
things that are different
... (e.g. transformation example and a file attachment
example)
... Need to choose divergent WCAG success criteria to show
that
JT: other questions, concerns, suggestions?
All: Silent
JT: So you will submit and return with feedback?
Resolution: OK to bring forward the discussed Candidate Recommendation Exit Criteria (before At-Risk) to management
JS: re: At-Risk
... We can discuss certain things to be "at-risk" and then a
course of action...to remove or reword...
... Prevents need to go back to LC
<jeanne> scribe: jeanne
<Jan> JR: Please clearly mark the at-reisk as being in draft
<Jan> JS: OK
<Jan> JT: OK, let's move onm
<Jan> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130523/results
<Jan> JT: Let's look at ones with no issues or objections...
<Jan> JT: A322 full agreement
<Jan> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130523/results#xq2
<Jan> Resolution: Mark https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130523/results#xq2 as approved
<Jan> JT: B111 full agreement https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130523/results#xq5
<Jan> Resolution: All agree to https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130523/results#xq5
<Jan> JT: B233 q
<Jan> JT: B233 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130523/results#xq9
<Jan> Resolution: All agree to change in B233 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130523/results#xq9
<Jan> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2013AprJun/0062.html
<Jan> A.3.2.1 Auto-Save (Minimum): The authoring tools does not include session time limits or the authoring tool can automatically save edits made before the session time limits.
<Jan> TB: Fine
<Jan> JS: OK
<Jan> JT: OK
<Jan> JT: Editorial change needed to the end, but OK with intent
suggest "session time limits expire"\
<Jan> Resolution: All agree to (with editorial tweak at the end) A.3.2.1 Auto-Save (Minimum): The authoring tools does not include session time limits or the authoring tool can automatically save edits made before the session time limits.
<Jan> JR: "A.3.3.1 Static View Option: If an editing-view can play visual time-based content, then playing is not necessarily automatic upon loading the content and playing can be paused. (Level A)"
<Jan> "A.3.3.1 Static View Option: If an editing-view can play visual time-based content, then playing is not necessarily automatic upon loading the content and playing can be paused. (Level A)"
<Jan> 2.3.2 Three Flashes: Web pages do not contain anything that flashes more than three times in any one second period. (Level AAA)
<Jan> Resolution: All agree with "A.3.3.1 Static View Option: If an editing-view can play visual time-based content, then playing is not necessarily automatic upon loading the content and playing can be paused. (Level A)"
<Jan> AL: OK with it
<Jan> TB: No objections
<Jan> Resolution: All agree to combine B232 and B233 as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2013AprJun/0062.html
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: Jan Inferring ScribeNick: Jan Found Scribe: jeanne Inferring ScribeNick: jeanne Scribes: Jan, jeanne ScribeNicks: Jan, jeanne Default Present: Jeanne, Jutta, Jan, Alastair, +1.703.678.aaaa, Greg, Alex, Sueann, Tim_Boland Present: Jeanne Jutta Jan Alastair +1.703.678.aaaa Greg Alex Sueann Tim_Boland WARNING: Replacing previous Regrets list. (Old list: Cherie, E.) Use 'Regrets+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list, such as: <dbooth> Regrets+ Cherie_E., Tom_B. Regrets: Cherie_E. Tom_B. Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2013AprJun/0064.html Got date from IRC log name: 03 Jun 2013 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2013/06/03-au-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]