W3C

- DRAFT -

WAI AU

03 Jun 2013

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Jeanne, Jutta, Jan, Alastair, +1.703.678.aaaa, Greg, Alex, Sueann, Tim_Boland
Regrets
Cherie_E., Tom_B.
Chair
Jutta Treviranus
Scribe
Jan, jeanne

Contents


<Jan> Scribe: Jan

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2013AprJun/0064.html

JS: Please add reviewing exit criteria

1. Re-chartering update (Jeanne)

<jeanne> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/draft_auwg_charter.html

JS: Latest charter is finished the amount of process Jeanne is involved with.
... it is now headed to W3M
... From within WAI, we are one of 2 that is done
... If charter is out for review by end of June, charter should be exteneded

Review of exist criteria

JS: Don't want this page to be discoverable yet
... Starts with status
... Next section is exit criteria
... We have been stuck on 13 ATAG SCs that depend for their level on WCAG
... But we will pick that up in a minute.
... The point here is that as we go into CR, we give criteria for when we know we're done and can become a full rec
... Reads the document...

JR: Only 2 seems like significant change

JR, JS: Discuss ...

JS: If group is ok with this, I'd like to advance this...

JR: Remove second (6) and remove erroneous extra paragraph at the bottom.

AL: Seeing it for the first time, I'd rather think about it

JT: Do you see something?

AL: Not from the call, but I'd like to have a bit more time

JS: Could you have the answer tomorrow?

AL: That quick?

JS: Yes, we had set a schedule to have exit criteria by this friday

AL: I won't stand in the way

JT: Any other suggested edits, concerns?

AC: "capable of passing 2 WCAG success criteria" where did the 2 come from?

JS: 2 is kind of a random choice...a small number but not all
... In range of small to all, W3C usually chooses 2

AC: OK, not objection

JS: Key is that it needs to be things that are different
... (e.g. transformation example and a file attachment example)
... Need to choose divergent WCAG success criteria to show that

JT: other questions, concerns, suggestions?

All: Silent

JT: So you will submit and return with feedback?

Resolution: OK to bring forward the discussed Candidate Recommendation Exit Criteria (before At-Risk) to management

JS: re: At-Risk
... We can discuss certain things to be "at-risk" and then a course of action...to remove or reword...
... Prevents need to go back to LC

<jeanne> scribe: jeanne

<Jan> JR: Please clearly mark the at-reisk as being in draft

<Jan> JS: OK

<Jan> JT: OK, let's move onm

SURVEY:

<Jan> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130523/results

<Jan> JT: Let's look at ones with no issues or objections...

<Jan> JT: A322 full agreement

<Jan> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130523/results#xq2

<Jan> Resolution: Mark https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130523/results#xq2 as approved

<Jan> JT: B111 full agreement https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130523/results#xq5

<Jan> Resolution: All agree to https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130523/results#xq5

<Jan> JT: B233 q

<Jan> JT: B233 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130523/results#xq9

<Jan> Resolution: All agree to change in B233 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130523/results#xq9

<Jan> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2013AprJun/0062.html

<Jan> A.3.2.1 Auto-Save (Minimum): The authoring tools does not include session time limits or the authoring tool can automatically save edits made before the session time limits.

<Jan> TB: Fine

<Jan> JS: OK

<Jan> JT: OK

<Jan> JT: Editorial change needed to the end, but OK with intent

suggest "session time limits expire"\

<Jan> Resolution: All agree to (with editorial tweak at the end) A.3.2.1 Auto-Save (Minimum): The authoring tools does not include session time limits or the authoring tool can automatically save edits made before the session time limits.

<Jan> JR: "A.3.3.1 Static View Option: If an editing-view can play visual time-based content, then playing is not necessarily automatic upon loading the content and playing can be paused. (Level A)"

<Jan> "A.3.3.1 Static View Option: If an editing-view can play visual time-based content, then playing is not necessarily automatic upon loading the content and playing can be paused. (Level A)"

<Jan> 2.3.2 Three Flashes: Web pages do not contain anything that flashes more than three times in any one second period. (Level AAA)

<Jan> Resolution: All agree with "A.3.3.1 Static View Option: If an editing-view can play visual time-based content, then playing is not necessarily automatic upon loading the content and playing can be paused. (Level A)"

<Jan> AL: OK with it

<Jan> TB: No objections

<Jan> Resolution: All agree to combine B232 and B233 as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2013AprJun/0062.html

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.138 (CVS log)
$Date: 2013-06-03 18:06:32 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138  of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: Jan
Inferring ScribeNick: Jan
Found Scribe: jeanne
Inferring ScribeNick: jeanne
Scribes: Jan, jeanne
ScribeNicks: Jan, jeanne
Default Present: Jeanne, Jutta, Jan, Alastair, +1.703.678.aaaa, Greg, Alex, Sueann, Tim_Boland
Present: Jeanne Jutta Jan Alastair +1.703.678.aaaa Greg Alex Sueann Tim_Boland

WARNING: Replacing previous Regrets list. (Old list: Cherie, E.)
Use 'Regrets+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list,
such as: <dbooth> Regrets+ Cherie_E., Tom_B.

Regrets: Cherie_E. Tom_B.
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2013AprJun/0064.html
Got date from IRC log name: 03 Jun 2013
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2013/06/03-au-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]