<gitbot> 01[13html01] 15rubys pushed 3 new commits to 06feature/whatwg: 02https://github.com/w3c/html/compare/0776094323b3...cd23be9e598a
<gitbot> 13html/06feature/whatwg 146bf8982 15ianh: [giow] (3) make <ruby> reset text-indent for sanity's sake (like with table)...
<gitbot> 13html/06feature/whatwg 148ef5b13 15ianh: [e] (0) Reverse this set of cross-references to remove some ambiguity....
<gitbot> 13html/06feature/whatwg 14cd23be9 15ianh: [e] (0) Clean up IDL...
<gitbot> 01[13html01] 15rubys pushed 5 new commits to 06feature/whatwg: 02https://github.com/w3c/html/compare/cd23be9e598a...b7dbf207c9f3
<gitbot> 13html/06feature/whatwg 1492e3121 15ianh: [giow] (0) Revert recent ruby change since it was based on a misunderstanding of CSS....
<gitbot> 13html/06feature/whatwg 140e0f5fd 15ianh: [giow] (2) Add an 'invalid' event sent to the _form_ when submission fails due to form validation. (The normative parts of this change were accidentally put in the previous checkin, sorry.)...
<gitbot> 13html/06feature/whatwg 14be98cb8 15ianh: [e] (0) Ack for revent checkins...
<paulc> trackbot, start meeting
<trackbot> Date: 14 March 2013
<scribe> scribenick: cabanier
<paulc_> test
paulc: there are none
paulc: there are none either
<krisk> We met as planned this week, notes -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2013Mar/0008.html
krisk: and classified section of the html spec
<krisk> See -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2013Mar/0009.html
… we have more consensus about what we want to do
… we sent out an email but got little feedback
… what section have or not have conformance requirement which is a big problem
… we don't know what section are at risk
… there's a lot of discussion on what sections have tests
…. I hope to label all the section so they can be properly tested
… There's a discussion to move to meeting so it doesn't conflict
… and this might help
paulc: what is the new time?
krisk: the meeting runs 11 to noon Boston time
… the proposal is to move to 12 to 1pm Boston time
… if someone can't accomodate, they should speak ip
paulc_: I will be able to attend that
krisk: any questions?
janina: we did not have our meeting since there were only 4 people that called in
… the bug taskforce is looking into closing a couple more bugs
… this should be a brief hiatus
… we will meet during the F2F altough some of us will attend the HTML meetings
… but we could have a brief joint session on Wednesday
<paulc_> You can add suggested coordination or topics to the Wiki at http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/wg/2013-04-Agenda
paulc_: you can suggested topics to the wiki
… the model we follow is that there suggested topics. The taskforce should fill that out.
… we should start thinking about what topics to discuss. Please add those to the wiki.
… I will ask the media taskforce to add things to the agenda
paulc_: the encrypted media team is continuing to meet
… they have over 30 bugs
… we spent a lot of time on some gnarly problem
… mse is making more progress
… there are only 3 bugs. but it's possible that they will publish a heartbeat
… this will be the first extension spec
… since there are so many extension spec we are looking into changing the process for call to consensus so it doesn't take a whole week
… janina, you might want to watch this process so you can follow it later later
… questions?
paulc_: this was published
<paulc_> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-html-longdesc-20130312/
… congratulations to the working group!
paulc_: this has failed
… we are looking into the bugs
… I'm hoping to create a summary. we will hope to come up with a recommendation on how to proceed
<paulc_> http://www.w3.org/QA/2013/03/drm_and_the_open_web.html
http://www.w3.org/QA/2013/03/drm_and_the_open_web.html
paulc_: there's been a lot of tension on the mailing list
<paulc_> http://www.w3.org/community/restrictedmedia/
… the chairs are of the view that the place for discussion is in the community group
… I suggest that these non-process discussions should be on that new community group email list
…. that blog post was a surprise to me as well
<paulc_> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Mar/0006.html
paulc_: this is the call for participation
<paulc_> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/html-april-2013/
paulc_: only 13 people have registered so far
… please add agenda items
<paulc_> Please add agenda items to: http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/wg/2013-04-Agenda
http://www.w3.org/QA/2013/03/openweb-weekly-2013-03-03.html
paulc_: this is the most recent one
… is there other business?
<krisk> I can help
paulc_: Sam will be the chair
… thanks kris!
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.137 of Date: 2012/09/20 20:19:01 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 0.99) Found ScribeNick: cabanier Inferring Scribes: cabanier WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: AnssiK Clarke Cynthia_Shelly Dashiva IanPouncey Lachy MFoladare Microsoft NeatBasis P19 Radhika_Roy SteveF aaaa aabb abarsto cabanier darobin dsinger dveditz gavin gitbot glenn heath html-wg https janina jarek jaymunro jeffh joined krisk lgombos mjs nonge paulc paulc_ plh scribenick silvia silvia1 stommepoes tantek tinkster tobie trackbot You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Mar/0014.html WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 14 Mar 2013 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2013/03/14-html-wg-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]