W3C

- DRAFT -

WAI AU

04 Mar 2013

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Jeanne, Jan, Alex, +1.571.765.aaaa, Greg
Regrets
J._Treviranus, T._Boland
Chair
Jan Richards
Scribe
Jan

Contents


<scribe> Scribe: Jan

1. Re-chartering survey results

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130301/results

<jeanne> JR: Intro, Scope and Deliverables: ok

<jeanne> JR: Deliverables: I recommend only keeping WCAG

<jeanne> AL: Is dependencies a one way or two way.

<jeanne> JS: One way.

<jeanne> JR: They are nice to talk to, but why give ourselves formal dependencies when we don't need to talk with them.

<jeanne> ... Keep wCAG, and maybe UAAG, because we refer to them.

Milestones

<jeanne> JR: Jeanne said 2 months, and I said 4 weeks. Since Alex has said that he won't be in the way of the group, I think it will take 4 weeks.

<jeanne> JR: Assembling the list of the tools.

<jeanne> JS: Suspect that we will need 20 tools.

<jeanne> JR: I don't think we will be testing 20 tools. 10 at the most.

<jeanne> JS: When I look at the report from October 2012, there were a lot of SC that were yellow/red.

<jeanne> JR: We aren't in contact with that many developers. Maybe we can say 10 to 20.

<jeanne> AL: Once we release a product, we aren't going to spend more resources testing it.

<jeanne> GP: We are in a similar situation

<jeanne> ... we will probably take an already shipping product and run the tests on it.

<jeanne> JR: I always assumed that we would be testing shipping products

<jeanne> AL: Once a product has shipped, I can't stop anyone from testing it.

<jeanne> JR: We want to hit a lot of SCs in a few products, then we want to use the specialized products to clean up.

2. Review of answers to the surveys re: tests:

B.1.1.2

2. Review of answers to the surveys re: tests:

<jeanne> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130107-4/results

B.1.1.2 Content Auto-Generation During Authoring Sessions

B.1.2.1 Restructuring and Recoding Transformations (WCAG)

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130107-4/results#xq10

in the second test...there are a few instances where restructuring should say recoding

B.1.2.2 Copy-Paste Inside Authoring Tool (WCAG)

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20130107-4/results#xq11

Fixed the condition

B.1.2.3 Optimizations Preserve Accessibility

B.1.2.4 Text Alternatives for Non-Text Content are Preserved

B.2.1.1 Accessible Content Possible (WCAG)

B.2.2.1 Accessible Option Prominence (WCAG)

B.2.2.2 Setting Accessibility Properties (WCAG)

B.2.3.1 Alternative Content is Editable (WCAG)

B.2.3.2 Repair of Text Alternatives During Authoring Sessions

B.2.3.3 Repair of Text Alternatives After Authoring Sessions

Add: "If the authoring tool does not give you an opportunity to accept, modify or reject the string, then select FAIL."

B.2.3.4 Save for Reuse

Begin at B.2.4.1 next time

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.137 (CVS log)
$Date: 2013-03-04 21:18:58 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.137  of Date: 2012/09/20 20:19:01  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: Jan
Inferring ScribeNick: Jan
Default Present: Jeanne, Jan, Alex, +1.571.765.aaaa, Greg
Present: Jeanne Jan Alex +1.571.765.aaaa Greg
Regrets: J._Treviranus T._Boland
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2013JanMar/0047.html
Got date from IRC log name: 04 Mar 2013
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2013/03/04-au-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]