shadi; We are still stuck on my end
sh: it is progressing slowly... all issues are
addressed
... we have to reference some more discussion on platform independence
peter: working on the issues
sh: any questions?
shadi: what's the plan for taking it to WAI Coordination Group (CG)?
sh: we are moving through issues
... when finished we will move it to the coordination group
... hope to make it till the end of the month
<Justin_> is muted
shadi: there is a meeting in the next days and I wiil bring it in
<Vivienne> no, I'm identified
<peter> yup
<Justin_> xakim, IPcaller is me
sh: shaw and david are reporting they are progressing slowly
shadi; is there a timeline?
sh: I;ll send an email for that
shadi; this will help to know when the group will need to review
shadi: this will help to know when the group will need to review
sh: klauss could not be here so I'll send him an email too
sh: there are 2 new ideas about open annotations
<mhakkinen> +q
sh: and about accessibility and india
marku: update on events taken place
... on the end of the workshop we disucssed on making a group and around 12
people were interested
... so e-learning has some interest
... I am going to rearragne the images topic to fit with haptic
sh: there are 3-4 ideas so we need to decide on
the order
... is there any barrier for putin a date for the next event
... there are some topics that can make a difference and i don;t want to loose
momentum
shadi: there are many tpoics
... 2 things need to take care
... our cycle from making the symposium to closing is quite long
... we still don't have a timeline on when we are going to close already open
topics
... the other thing is that we are interlinked with other groups... we are
overlapping with other groups and we need some criteria of selection of topics
... this is also usefull in coordination
... it's good to have discussion of next topic .... but we need to move on
closing already open ones
sh:
sorry... i lost audio
<peter> I can scribe
I am dropping for a moment ... be right back...
<peter> sh: need a plan so we know what we're doing
<peter> .. 2-3 months to get next symposium going, this gives us time to clear up metrics and mobile notes
<peter> .. and work other notes
peter I can take it from here
<peter> sh: today I propose we rank the proposals
<peter> righto :)
<shadi> scribe: christos
<peter> yup
<shadi> +1 to Simon's proposal
<Yehya> +1
<giorgio> +1 fr simon
<Vivienne> accreditation
sh: we can decide which ones are the next 3
... we can also include the 2 topics I've sent out this morning
<peter> We have: http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/User_modelling, http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Accreditation_Methods (what were the other two again?)
sh: in this case we can communicate with the
community groups
... typing each one and +1 you want
<sharper> User Modelling
+1
<Justin_> +1
<annika> +1
<sharper> +1
<peter> +1
<Yehya> +1
<Vivienne> +1
user modeling, acceditation, notifcation, haptics and smart images, etextbook and elearning
<shadi> +1
<giorgio> +1
<mhakkinen> +1
<sharper> Haptics and Smart Images
<peter> +1
<shadi> +1
<giorgio> +1
<Vivienne> +1
<mhakkinen> +1
+1
<sharper> +1
sh: 7 for smart images
<sharper> Notifications
<shadi> +1
+1
<annika> +1
<Yehya> +1
<peter> +1
<Justin_> +1
<sharper> etextbook and elearning
<Justin_> +1
<mhakkinen> +1
<Yehya> +1
<giorgio> +1
<sharper> +1
<sharper> Accreditation
<Justin_> +1
<Vivienne> +1
<annika> +1
<mhakkinen> +q
sh; we got user modelling, haptics and smart images and notifications
marku: are we going to open vote to others not participating the call?
shadi: we are neglecting part of the group from
the vote.... so if we want a formal vote we might need to use open voting
... there is difference between majority vote and concensus
sh: we might need to wirte a shoprt paragraph on why to select each topic
viv: I agree with shadi ... maybe we can present this paragraph in the wiki?
sh: the short description of why it is important
will become part of the wiki
... we are researchers an we more or less know what is going to have an impact
... we sent an email and vote out before christmas and it all came back to the
same topics...
... however if the group wants an official vote I think we can arrange that
shadi: viviennes suggestion was usefull
... since the decision impacts the course of the group so i'd like not to miss
anyones point
<Vivienne> yes, that's fine
<mhakkinen> +1
shadi: maybe sent a notification and request objections
<sharper> email
<Vivienne> +1
+1
<peter> +1
<giorgio> +1
<annika> +1
<mhakkinen> +q
sh: what the groups thinks about a symposium on developing countries and accessibility and on open annotations
marku: the annotations topic was discussed ont he
ebooks workshop
... it would be good to have a topic on ebook and openannotations too
viv: i like the idea of reaching the india group
sh: So I'll present the 3 selected topics and then run through the new ones