W3C

- DRAFT -

Web Performance Working Group Teleconference

06 Feb 2013

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
+1.626.379.aaaa, [Microsoft], James, Plh, +1.503.799.aabb, JatinderMann, DanielAustin, ganeshrao
Regrets
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
JatinderMann

Contents


<trackbot> Date: 06 February 2013

TPAC 2013

Philippe: The TPAC has been confirmed for November 22nd in China.
... I believe people were interested in a face to face meeting with performance folks at last TPAC.

Jatinder: The working group should decide whether we want to meet at TPAC in China this year or meet in the US later this year.

Dan: Last time Web Apps was interested in performance.

Ganesh: From our previous workshop, there was discussion on providing performance guidance documentation. Where are we on that?

Dan: Philippe, weren't you leading a task force on helping providing guidance on improving HTML performance?

<plh> http://www.w3.org/wiki/Headlights2013

Philippe: Yes, I'm working on putting together a task force that will provide recommendations on how we can improve HTML performance. You all here are welcome to join.

Test Cases

Jatinder: Page Visibility test cases need to be moved from the submitted folder to the approved folder.
... The test suite is complete. We were considering adding a test case that tested the ordering of event firing between document and subdocument, however, the spec doesn’t specify that ordering, so it’s unnecessary.
... I can see that Pan has a few tests cases that are different from the approved User Timing test cases. I will review them this week.

Philippe: The secureConnectionStart test can be submitted but it should be optional.

Feedback on Existing Specifications

Jatinder: Philippe, can we move Timing control for script-based animations to CR and Page Visibility to PR this week?

Philippe: I'll go through them and try to get it done there.

Jatinder: Pan had provided some feedback on clarifying a few sentences in Resource Timing. They don’t appear to change the intended meaning of those sentences and just clarify, I think we can make the change. I’ll review the text again.

Feedback on New Specifications

Jatinder: Alois and I have begun discussing Beacon API, and I have started looking into Resource Priorities. We will probably have more to say in the next few weeks.

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.137 (CVS log)
$Date: 2013/02/06 18:36:36 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.137  of Date: 2012/09/20 20:19:01  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: JatinderMann
Inferring Scribes: JatinderMann
Default Present: +1.626.379.aaaa, [Microsoft], James, Plh, +1.503.799.aabb
Present: +1.626.379.aaaa [Microsoft] James Plh +1.503.799.aabb JatinderMann DanielAustin ganeshrao

WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Found Date: 06 Feb 2013
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2013/02/06-webperf-minutes.html
People with action items: 

[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]