ISSUE-98: HTTP status code for application specific errors

bertails

HTTP status code for application specific errors

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Best Practices & Guidelines
Raised by:
Alexandre Bertails
Opened on:
2014-04-24
Description:
LDP does not defined a recommended status code for application specific errors. 4.2.1.6 [1] currently says that the status code is in the 4xx range, plus the use of the rel=describedby Link header.

Here is the discussion I had this morning with SteveS:

[[
<betehess> SteveS, looks like the LDP spec is vague re: status code for business logic errors (I guess on purpose :-). It says 4xx + rel=describedby. Unofficially, which 4xx would you choose?
<SteveS> 400
<betehess> my colleagues think that 400 looks too much like a fallback strategy
<SteveS> I agree with the sentiment that 400 is “fall back” but I don’t see anything better
<SteveS> perhaps we should create/propose one?
<betehess> that would be a good idea
<betehess> I would expect the spec to help me choose one for business logic errors
<betehess> but that would be kinda a fallback as well
<betehess> so maybe 400 is just good enough when used with rel=describedby
<betehess> or we need something targeting specifically application specific logic
<SteveS> yes, well what we have now is the link and you follow it and maybe what you get helps
<SteveS> we could improve it by a) a different status code and/or b) a specialized link relation
]]

I am totally fine with the 3 following solutions:

1. 400 + rel=describedby
2. new status code
3. 400 + specialized link relation

I have a slight preference for 1. as it is less work.

Alexandre

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/#h5_ldpr-gen-pubclireqs
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: ldp-ISSUE-98 (bertails): HTTP status code for application specific errors [Linked Data Platform Spec] (from sspeiche@gmail.com on 2014-04-24)
  2. ldp-ISSUE-98 (bertails): HTTP status code for application specific errors [Linked Data Platform Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2014-04-24)

Related notes:

Resolution: Add to the BP&G doc option 1, as described in issue-98 ( i.e. 400 + rel=describedby)
See http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-05-05#resolution_2

Arnaud Le Hors, 5 May 2014, 15:50:28

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 98.html,v 1.1 2015/08/17 04:43:13 denis Exp $