ISSUE-11: Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications?

Server-managed properties

Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Linked Data Platform Spec
Raised by:
Raúl García Castro
Opened on:
2012-10-02
Description:
"4.4.1 If HTTP PUT is performed on an existing resource, BPR servers must replace the entire persistent state of the identified resource with the entity representation in the body of the request. The only recognized exception are the properties dcterms:modified and dcterms:creator that are never under client control - BPR servers must ignore any values of these properties that are provided by the client."

I think that saying that dcterms:modified and dcterms:creator cannot be modified by clients is an application-specific restriction.

I would not include it, but if you think that it is relevant, I would rewrite it in the style of 5.5.2:
"BPR servers MAY ignore server managed properties such as dcterms:modified and dcterms:creator".
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. LDP Rec (from eric@w3.org on 2015-02-20)
  2. Re: ldp-ISSUE-59 (recursive-delete): Reconsider usage of Aggregate/Composite construct to get predictable container delete behavior [Linked Data Platform core] (from ashok.malhotra@oracle.com on 2013-04-05)
  3. Re: Review and Comments for Linked Data Platform FPWD (from david@3roundstones.com on 2013-03-05)
  4. Re: Review and Comments for Linked Data Platform FPWD (from sspeiche@gmail.com on 2013-03-04)
  5. Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (from pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr on 2013-02-04)
  6. Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (from roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com on 2013-02-04)
  7. Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (from sergio.fernandez@salzburgresearch.at on 2013-02-04)
  8. Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-02-04)
  9. Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (from pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr on 2013-02-04)
  10. Re: establishing conversational context (was: Creating non-Atom LDPRs: AtomStrict & AtomRelax) (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2013-02-04)
  11. Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (from sergio.fernandez@salzburgresearch.at on 2013-02-04)
  12. Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2013-01-30)
  13. Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (from sergio.fernandez@salzburgresearch.at on 2013-01-30)
  14. Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (from rgarcia@fi.upm.es on 2013-01-30)
  15. Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2013-01-29)
  16. Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (from sergio.fernandez@salzburgresearch.at on 2013-01-29)
  17. Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2012-12-19)
  18. Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2012-12-17)
  19. Review and Comments for Linked Data Platform FPWD (from david@3roundstones.com on 2012-10-28)
  20. Re: LDP F2F agenda (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-10-19)
  21. Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (from olivier.berger@it-sudparis.eu on 2012-10-07)
  22. ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-10-02)

Related notes:

Closed per http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/meeting/2013-02-11

Arnaud Le Hors, 11 Feb 2013, 22:35:47

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 11.html,v 1.1 2015/08/17 04:43:06 denis Exp $