W3C

- DRAFT -

WCAG2ICT Task Force Teleconference

20 Nov 2012

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Bruce_Bailey, [Oracle], Gregg_Vanderheiden, Kiran_Kaja, Andi_Snow_Weaver, Janina_Sajka, Alex_Li, David_MacDonald, +1.510.334.aaaa
Regrets
Loic_Martinez_Normand, Mike_Pluke, Mary_Jo_Mueller
Chair
Andi_Snow-Weaver
Scribe
Andi_Snow-Weaver, David

Contents


<trackbot> Date: 20 November 2012

<scribe> scribe: Andi_Snow-Weaver

<scribe> scribenick: Andi

<Kiran_Kaja> Very sad to hear that

Survey on "set" definitions and and final 3

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/NOV182012/results

<David> scribe: David

proposal #10 closed functionality https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/home/introduction-to-wcag2ict-application-note/closed-functionality

<greggvanderheiden> https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/home/introduction-to-wcag2ict-application-note/closed-functionality

<Andi> here is the edited sentence: With these success criteria something else needs to be provided or be required in order to make the information addressed in these success criteria accessible.

Group editing document... working on call, based on survey feedback...

Many of the success criteria in WCAG 2.0 do not <remove>provide </remove><add>facilitate</add>direct access

RESOLUTION: ? accept proposal 10 as edited... to be cleaned up for spelling by editors

<Andi> s/Resolution:/RESOLUTION:/

s/propsal/proposal/

"Set of" definitions

concerned analogue to linking that we are trying to define software..

Set in WCAG, no mashups... discrete entities, with separate URL, first disappears, when new page comes up...

<Zakim> Bruce_Bailey, you wanted to point out that Note 5 is key: “Note 5: If there is any ambiguity whether the group is a set, then the group is not a set.” and to ask if Word

<greggvanderheiden> group of software programs that are distributed together and that can be launched and be used independently from each other, but that are interlinked each with every other one such that users can easily move from one program to another via a hyperlink or control, without taking other actions in a manner similar to moving between web pages.

<korn> Sorry; I'm back.

Microsoft or Apple Works set of software?

fundamentally, cannot define software, the way we can a web page...

<greggvanderheiden> group of software programs that are distributed together and that can be launched and be used independently from each other, but that are interlinked each with every other one such that users can easily move from one program to another via a consistent set of choices hyperlink or control, without taking other actions in a manner similar to moving between web pages.

<greggvanderheiden> group of software programs that are distributed together and that can be launched and be used independently from each other, but that are interlinked each with every other one such that users can easily move from one program to another via a consistent list of choices that appears in each member of the set and allows users to move between the software programs in a manner similar to moving between web pages.

<Andi> suggestion that in order for programs to be part of a set, they have to each have a consistentUI control, such as a menu, that clearly has the names of all of the other programs in the set that is used to switch to the other programs

<greggvanderheiden> group of software programs that are distributed together and that can be launched and be used independently from each other, but that are interlinked each with every other one such that users can easily move from one program to another via a consistent list of choices that appears in each member of the set

discussion of word smithing "set"

<greggvanderheiden> group of software programs that are distributed together and that can be launched and be used independently from each other, but that are interlinked each with every other one such that users can easily move from one program to another via a consistent list of choices that appears in each member of the set

several in group need to reflect on the proposed definition above...

<korn> +1

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.137 (CVS log)
$Date: 2012-11-20 16:45:28 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.137  of Date: 2012/09/20 20:19:01  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/Resolution:/RESOLUTION:?/
Succeeded: s/propsal/proposal/
FAILED: s/Resolution:/RESOLUTION:/
FAILED: s/propsal/proposal/
Succeeded: s/Peter: //
Succeeded: s/Gregg: //
Succeeded: s/consisten /consistent/
Found Scribe: Andi_Snow-Weaver
Found ScribeNick: Andi
Found Scribe: David
Inferring ScribeNick: David
Scribes: Andi_Snow-Weaver, David
ScribeNicks: Andi, David
Default Present: Bruce_Bailey, [Oracle], Gregg_Vanderheiden, Kiran_Kaja, Andi_Snow_Weaver, Janina_Sajka, Alex_Li, David_MacDonald, +1.510.334.aaaa
Present: Bruce_Bailey [Oracle] Gregg_Vanderheiden Kiran_Kaja Andi_Snow_Weaver Janina_Sajka Alex_Li David_MacDonald +1.510.334.aaaa
Regrets: Loic_Martinez_Normand Mike_Pluke Mary_Jo_Mueller
Found Date: 20 Nov 2012
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2012/11/20-wcag2ict-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]