Bug Review

clarke: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13359
... please check out this bug activity

Requirements Document

<inserted> Juhani's comments on adaptive bit rate requirements

juhani: comments around terminology
... not new reqs or use cases
... should we keep terms not used in doc?

clarke: agrees no need to retain unused defs

juhani: e.g., programme, media track, etc.
... some of these unused defs are questionable
... suggests new pan-definition for 'adaptive bit rate {streaming, content, media}'
... should have single def using consistent head term 'adaptive bit rate'
... suggests defs for 'no abr method preference' and 'open source browsers'

clarke: agrees, will review and implement

action clarke to review and implement changes to terminology related to ABR in reqs document

<trackbot> Created ACTION-99 - Review and implement changes to terminology related to ABR in reqs document [on Clarke Stevens - due 2012-07-05].

 

<inserted> Juhani's comments on content protection requirements

juhani: further comments about terminology in CP reqs document
... in particular, confusion about distinction between 'content protection {method,system,solution}'
... proposes to use either/or formulation

<inserted> Requirements for Content Protection

ddorwin: 4.1.4 says system but should be solution...

clarke: don't need to make reqs on implementations, do we?

ddorwin: 'system' is misleading w.r.t. applicability to implementation or spec

<ddorwin> 4.1.10: This sounds like a container requirement, which I don't think is necessary.

ddorwin: 4.1.10 sounds like a container req

<ddorwin> 4.1.11: Is "determine from the media stream" correct? Again, this is also a requirement on containers. FYI, I don't think ISO CENC does this.

<ddorwin> 4.1.12: " determine from the media stream" doesn't make sense for errors.

<ddorwin> 4.1.13: Media Source is not an "element".

<ddorwin> 4.2.1: What does "provision of tools" mean?

<ddorwin> some are nits

ddorwin: what does 'provision of tools' mean?
... thinking it means 'the specification provides tools/features...'

clarke: 'provision of tools' probably should use different word than 'tools'; suggestions welcome
... please send comments
... believes the TF is near end of life; should transfer responsibility to ...
... suggests skipping meeting next week (5th) due to US holidays
... suggests final review of comments, then either shut down TF or go dormant

ACTION clarke to send feedback on these review comments

<trackbot> Created ACTION-100 - Send feedback on these review comments [on Clarke Stevens - due 2012-07-05].

Adjournment

adjourned