See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 31 May 2012
<scribe> Scribe: Steven
Manu: Anything?
Ivan: Hopefully nothing will happen between now and next Tuesday
Manu: Status sections, and timing
of primer
... we want to publish the primer as a note, but I want it to
have a bit more review
... Can we update a primer?
Steven: Yes
Manu: So planning to publish next
Thursday
... status sections need to be included
Steven: Status sections are Ivan's responsibility
Ivan: Yes, boilerplate is
fine
... I'll check it tomorrow
<ShaneM> it is here: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-core/Overview-src.html
Ivan: We have to send an official
pub request
... I have it prepared
... but I am at Semtech on the day it needs to be sent, so I'd
prefer someone else to do it
... and I would like Manu and Shane to be around to answer
questions from the webmaster
Manu: No call next week.
... but two or more meetings before the group ends
[Discussion on which email list to use; decided on public-rdfa@
]
Shane: No link to errata in lite. OK to add?
Manu: Sure
Manu: Press we have lined up is
the announcement at Semtech
... and another article
... anyone else planning?
Ivan: There's a panel at Semtech, where it will be mentioned
Manu: Will that be scribed?
Ivan: Dunno
... And there is the question of a W3C press-release
... we're reaching out to companies to see if it is
possible
... it might happen
Manu: We can plan something for
in a week or so, I'm working on contacts
... and keep announcements coming
Steven: Is the old content on rdfa.info around
Manu: We have an archive, but it's not up
Steven: So old URLs are currently broken?
Manu: Yeah, for now
Steven: Are we publishing on rdfa.info?
Manu: No, on your own blog, or elsewhere
Shane: Note that the specs use xhtml+rdfa, and it's worth pointing it out
Ivan: And the primer
gkellogg: RDF and SPARQL WGs should use it as well
Shane: Good idea!
Manu: Publishing as notes
... just requires time
Ivan: It is a valuable document, and actually already usable
Shane: PFWG owns this
<niklasl> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2012Feb/0069.html
Shane: what should we do?
Niklas: vocab shouldn't apply to role
Ivan: The role people have a
bunch of values they want to use
... role should behave as if the vocab is set to xhv
Niklas: Agree
<Zakim> ShaneM, you wanted to talk about role and vocab
Shane: the intention was that
role would have a collection of reserved words in the xhv
space
... ARIA relies heavily on @role
... they already use it
... they want to be able to extend the collection
... and cite predefined roles without anything special
... It's fine if vocab doesn't apply, as long as prefix
applies
... and full URIs work
Ivan: This means that rdfa implementations won't look at @role
Shane: I'm ok with that
Niklas: In atom @rel is always set to IANA relations
Manu: That is a parallel
issue
... are you suggesting we use that as a model for how to deal
with @role?
Niklas: We need to think about the future and increasing possibilities
Ivan: That is for RDFa2
... With 4 minutes to go, should we try to do RDFa+Atom as a
note?
Manu: We need to review it
Ivan: I have implemented it, it is doable
Manu: Should we publish it as a note?
Gregg: Future discussion
Manu: We should pull in Sam Ruby
<ShaneM> w.r.t role - I am changing the spec to read: <li>Each value of <aref>role</aref> is an <em>object</em>, forming an
<ShaneM> RDF triple with the subject and predicate defined above. An RDFa Processor MUST behave as if there is an in-scope vocabulary of <code>http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab/</code> for the value(s) of the <aref>role</aref> attribute.</li>
No call next week.
Manu: Thanks all!
[ADJOURN]
<MacTed> trackbot, end call
<trackbot> Sorry, MacTed, I don't understand 'trackbot, end call'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help
<MacTed> trackbot, end conference
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136 of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/ivle/ible/ Succeeded: s/contact/contacts/ Succeeded: s/nroken/broken?/ Succeeded: s/XXX/gkellogg/ Succeeded: s/xhd/xhv/ Succeeded: s/RDF2/RDFa2/ No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: Steven_ Found Scribe: Steven WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: Gregg Ivan MacTed Manu Niklas OpenLink_Software P10 P18 P30 P37 P40 Shane ShaneM Steven Steven_ gkellogg joined manu1 niklasl rdfa scor trackbot You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2012May/0139.html WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 31 May 2012 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2012/05/31-rdfa-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]