See also: IRC log
<scribe> scribe: Jon
<MichaelC> scribeNick: jongund
JN: There were two items on the
survey, and the people are not here who proposed them
... We could send the minutes to them
LG: Maybe it is fine, but it
could be a topic of discussion
... There is no way to find out the original placeholder
JN: AT could do that and maybe a
plug-in
... I see your concern, whether it is correct or not
LG: Clearly meets the spirit when it is there
JN: Does WCAG require the label must be visible?
LG: Not directly
... This is definitely 3.3.2
JN: This is not a 3.3.1
LG: You still need a label for a
screen reader, maybe it is a 3.3.5 technqiue
... It seems more like 332
... This type of example is in 3.3.2 techniques
JN: It should always be in
combination with a label
... Provide descriptive labels and one of the following
... Are you happy with your concerns of the place holder label
disappearing?
LG: yes
JN: JG: I am not sure
JG: I could try testing it
<jamesn> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-api-map/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
JN: There is a reference in the
accessible description section to the use of @placeholder
... Not sure if actually supported
... @placeholder can be used for example values
... @placeholder is an example
<jamesn> The placeholder attribute represents a short hint (a word or short phrase) intended to aid the user with data entry. A hint could be a sample value or a brief description of the expected format.
<jamesn> The placeholder attribute should not be used as an alternative to a label.
LN: What could you use @placeholder for in WCAG 2.0, is the question
JN: @placeholder could be a
visual lable and search button next to it
... Should be an HTML5 validation failure if you do not have a
label
... Anything else on placeholder
<jamesn> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/htmltechs-20120409/results
<jamesn> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Using_HTML5_section_elements
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/htmltechs-20120409/results#xsection
LG: Working on the test procedure would help with the technique
JG: Is that the proper use of ARTICLE?
LG: I not sure
... It is good if a test procedure can be used in isolation
Discuss this technique next week
JN: FTF meeting at Lyon, get more
people involved
... Try to get some techniques written
LG: I will be there
JN: Josh will be there, I may be able to come
MC: People from other groups will be there, PF, Authoring
JN: The overlap ones are a big issue, there are mon/tues and thurs/fri
LG: I think we can make it a
working session with an agenda, may attact participation
... We would need to have a detailed draft agenda soon
JN: MC what are the timeline?
MC: There is a survey now, I am
looking when it closes
... 30 April is the deadline
... Difficult to backout if things don't work
JN: Who will be attending
LG: having an agenda will help
MC: We have enough people to fill time, it is a question of people participating
LG: Maybe we can get a discussion going
rrsagent draft, minutes
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136 of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: Jon Found ScribeNick: jongund WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: Cooper JG JN James_Nurthen Jon_Gunderson LG LN Loretta MC Marc_Johlic MichaelC P15 aaaa https jamesn marcjohlic scribeNick You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy Regrets: Bruce_Bailey Joshue_O_Connor Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2012AprJun/0008.html Got date from IRC log name: 09 Apr 2012 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2012/04/09-html-techs-tf-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]