See also: IRC log
<scribe> Scribe: Jan
JT: Status of meeting with WCAG, Jeanne?
JS: Will take care of that this PM
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2012JanMar/0014.html
JT: Suggestions, concerns - we brought it up last week?
Alex: What is the goal of the meeting?
JT: Mutually agreeable solution.
AL: Would we be ok with a
search-and-replace term?
... Is there a list of terms.
JR: I sent a list to WAI-CG a while back
AL: Right, accessibility can be a loaded term
GP: WCAG has a note on this
AL: What about WCAG conformant
JR: Then there is the "accessibility supported" issue
JS: For me , readability is the most important issue
GP: How can you describe "accessible" without that term?
AL: Its all complicated by
context of use etc.
... And WCAG has been very careful to describe that and the y
just want us to respect that
GP: Reads WCAG's disclaimer note...
AL: But WCAG2 does not use term accessible in the SC's
JS: OK to remove from our SC but want to keep in principles and guidelihnes
AL: Assuming we are entering a negotiation...know your bottom line ahead of time
AC: I support the proposed text...not trying to be hard line...just wondering what compromise would look like.
JT: I hear the group saying we should start with our proposal here, trying to keep our document simple
AC: Agreed
GP: Agreed
JT: So Jeanne, you will set up meeting?
JS: Yes
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2012JanMar/0017.html
<AlastairC> AC: Makes sense, I hadn't thought it applied to copy-paste when reading about re-structuring the first time.
Resolution: All accept splitting copy-paste from content transformations]
oops I think Cherie was here afterall
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136 of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: Jan Inferring ScribeNick: Jan WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: AC AL Alastair AlastairC Alex Andrew GP Greg IPcaller JR JS JT Jan Jeanne Jutta Microsoft P2 P4 Tim Tim_Boland andrewronksley You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy WARNING: Replacing previous Regrets list. (Old list: Cherie, E.) Use 'Regrets+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list, such as: <dbooth> Regrets+ Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2012JanMar/0018.html Got date from IRC log name: 30 Jan 2012 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2012/01/30-au-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]