ISSUE-115: LC Comment: Unsetting @base and @prefix
LC Comment: Unsetting @base and @prefix
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDF Turtle
- Raised by:
- Guus Schreiber
- Opened on:
- 2013-02-13
- Description:
- See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2012Sep/0076.html
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-115: LC Comment: Unsetting @base and @prefix [RDF Turtle] (from eric@w3.org on 2013-02-14)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-115: LC Comment: Unsetting @base and @prefix [RDF Turtle] (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2013-02-14)
- RDF-ISSUE-115: LC Comment: Unsetting @base and @prefix [RDF Turtle] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-02-13)
Related notes:
RESOLVED: add text [[ Note that concatenation of Turtle files does not necessarily produce the RDF graph merge of the two serialized graphs and can lead to unexpected results. For instance, @base may change the BASE URI, re-used blank node labels will be merged, and @prefixes may differ. ]]" to http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/#sec-parsing-example
See: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2013-02-13#resolution_1
RESOLVED: add text [[ Note that concatenation of Turtle files does not necessarily produce the RDF graph merge of the two serialized graphs and can lead to unexpected results. For instance, @base may change the BASE URI, re-used blank node labels will be merged, and @prefixes may differ. ]]" to http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/#sec-parsing-example
See: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2013-02-13#resolution_1
Display change log
