ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference
delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Primer
- Raised by:
- Stephan Zednik
- Opened on:
- 2012-11-01
- Description:
- The PROV-N example specifies that ex:derek was acting on behalf of ex:chartgen during the ex:compose activity.
agent(ex:chartgen,
[prov:type='prov:Organization',
foaf:name="Chart Generators Inc"])
actedOnBehalfOf(ex:derek, ex:chartgen, ex:compose)
This reference to ex:compose is not present in the PROV-O encoding of this same example.
ex:derek prov:actedOnBehalfOf ex:chartgen .
ex:chartgen a prov:Agent ;
a prov:Organization ;
foaf:name "Chart Generators Inc" . - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2013-02-19)
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer] (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2013-02-19)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2013-01-24)
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer] (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2012-11-08)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-11-07)
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer] (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2012-11-07)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-11-06)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2012-11-01)
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer] (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2012-11-01)
- PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-11-01)
Related notes:
The primer now contains the following text which I think adequately explains that delegations can be both activity-specific as well as general (global?).
"It would also be possible to express the more specific statement that Derek worked on the organization's behalf for a particular activity, rather than in general, and so may have acted on behalf of other organizations for other activities. See the PROV specifications for details on how to express activity-specific delegation."
Consequently, I am closing this issue.
Display change log
