ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC
ivan's feedback on prov-n LC
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- prov-n
- Raised by:
- Luc Moreau
- Opened on:
- 2012-09-10
- Description:
- Original email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2012Aug/0005.html
Really just minor issues I found:
- Wouldn't it be nice (and I know this is a pain in the back side to implement) to have references from the grammar to the corresponding entry in prov-dm?
- I do not see an obvious place where the grammar can be downloaded as one piece (maybe I just missed it). I think it is important to provide this if implementers want to have their own parser…
- 3.4.7, Namespace declaration:
- minor buglet: in the bulleted item either both lines should begin with capital 'T' or none of the two
- I do not understand this sentence:
"the scope of a namespace declaration directly occurring in a toplevel
bundle is the toplevel bundle itself, except and namedBundle it may contain".
I presume what it wants to say is that a namespace declaration in a named bundle has priority over the namespace declaration in the top level bundle and somehow the editing went wrong…
Ivan
----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-589: scope of prefixes in prov-n documents [prov-n] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-11-06)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-589: scope of prefixes in prov-n documents [prov-n] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-11-02)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-589: scope of prefixes in prov-n documents [prov-n] (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2012-11-01)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-11-01)
- PROV-ISSUE-589: scope of prefixes in prov-n documents [prov-n] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-11-01)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-10-21)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2012-10-21)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-10-16)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-10-16)
- Re: Compliance with PROV-N (related to PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n]) (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-10-16)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-10-16)
- Compliance with PROV-N (related to PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n]) (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-10-16)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-10-16)
- PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-09-10)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log