ISSUE-115: prov:preceded should be replaced with prov:followed
Tlebo
prov:preceded should be replaced with prov:followed
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Ontology
- Raised by:
- Timothy Lebo
- Opened on:
- 2011-10-05
- Description:
- All other predicates are pointing from the newer rdfs:Resource to the older rdfs:Resource (e.g. prov:wasDerivedFrom).
This "backwards looking" paradigm makes sense because we need to describe newer things in terms of the older things sitting around.
prov:preceded is inconsistent with this paradigm, as it "looks forwards" to the newer one, which may not exist yet.
I recommend we REPLACE prov:preceded with prov:followed and reverse the definition. To keep the ontology trim, we should leave the definition of prov:followed's inverse to an extension. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-115 (Tlebo): prov:preceded should be replaced with prov:followed [Formal Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-05)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-115 (Tlebo): prov:preceded should be replaced with prov:followed [Formal Model] (from dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es on 2012-03-05)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-115 (Tlebo): prov:preceded should be replaced with prov:followed [Formal Model] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2011-10-11)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-115 (Tlebo): prov:preceded should be replaced with prov:followed [Formal Model] (from Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk on 2011-10-05)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-115 (Tlebo): prov:preceded should be replaced with prov:followed [Formal Model] (from dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es on 2011-10-05)
- PROV-ISSUE-115 (Tlebo): prov:preceded should be replaced with prov:followed [Formal Model] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-10-05)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log
