See also: IRC log
JB: what is the status of text-related bugs, in the bug triage review
LW: rechecking among the ones that we have pulled out
JB: defer briefly for now
JB: Janina were the Chairs saying that they would send the longdesc re-survey out in mid-January?
<scribe> scribe: Judy
JS: checking TF minutes
... they were hoping to have the final review of the change proposals out before holiday break. one down, another to go. no commitment on survey, acc to minutes.
JB & JS, re-check w/ Chairs on planned timing of survey
JB: [side discussion] still some accessibility problems with bugzilla interface?
LW: some combination of accessibility and usability issues
JB: talked with M. Cooper, still needs to discuss w/ Steve F., and then revise some parts of his proposal. Pending, but MC will contact SF to schedule discussion.
JB: any update on meeting w/ SF on meta name generator?
JS: I will meet with SF over the holidays
JS: same situation, need a conversation w/ SF, will happen over the holidays
JB: what about the status of the bugs about removing incorrect alt guidance from the spec?
LW: these were assigned to Steve F, not sure the exact status, but these are not corrected yet
JB: may ping steve f for an update on these, then talk w/ Co-Chairs
JS: yes, concerned about scattered odd comments about accessibility throughout the doc; need to also be addressing these, in addition to the technical guidance
JB: do these things have a text flag for these items
LW: yes, but not working well at the moment. will ping MC for suggestions.
JB: UAWG is reviewing the generated content item still, and will probably commit to taking it up, but might have advice back to TF as well; keep monitoring this item till confirm closed.
JB: interested in current status of fig caption in bugzilla?
... there are at least two relevant bugs
JB: long discussion on the actual
bugtracker, haven't been getting notifications. available here:
... reminders that example sets and usability feedback were in progress at one point, need to resume
... and need to reply to Sam's qu from yesterday.
JS: need examples & use cases.
JB: had already documented examples; need to write them up for user testing
LW: just found another bug relating to fig caption
JB: resume write-up of test examples
JB: LW, thanks for bug searches
... JS, how being tracked?
LW: We are assigning, and then we are tracking and reminding.
JB: concerned about availability of some assignees...
All: looking through comprehensive bug list, of accessibility-tagged
LW: we need to re-assign the "needs info" bugs
JB: but what about the "won't fix" bugs?
LW: We need to check with all the regular filers
JS: and we need to escalate to an
issue by mid-Jan, by then.
... we need to schedule extra meetings... may need to schedule extra meetings the first week of January
JB: do a deadline marathon?
LW: expand bug triage meeting that week?
JB: wondering about the 3rd as
... and then the 10th?
LW: there may be many labeled "fixed" where we don't agree with the resolution
JB: right, that was the ones I was referring to
JS could you chair a Jan 3rd call if I queue up a notice, and ping people in advance? and then we do an extended meeting the following week?
scribe: and if Michael can be
... and with links and bugs list to search...
LW: can be backup for chairing
... on Jan 3rd
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136 of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/interface/interface?/ Succeeded: s/found/just found/ Succeeded: s/the following meet/the following week/ Found Scribe: Judy Inferring ScribeNick: Judy Default Present: Judy, Janina_Sajka, Leonie_Watson Present: Judy Janina_Sajka Leonie_Watson Regrets: John Michael Got date from IRC log name: 20 Dec 2011 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/12/20-text-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]