Bug triage telecon 4th October 2011

04 Oct 2011

See also: IRC log


Hans_Hillen, Léonie_Watson, Joshu_O'Connor, Michael_Cooper
Everett_Zufelt, Gez_Lemon, Marco_Ranon
Léonie Watson
Joshue, Hans


<LeonieWatson> agenda: this

<Joshue> scribe: Joshue


LW: Our next task is to look at the bugs we have tagged and see if they have the right priority
... Hans didn't you do this?

HH: I did mention if there should be a priority change.

LW: Will we go thru some on call and then divide up rest at the end.

HH: Do we have a list

LW: Yes

HH: Goes to search for tagged bugs

<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&longdesc_type=allwordssubstr&longdesc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=a11ytf&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bug_id_type=anyexact&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfield

<hhillen> w&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=

HH: Do you want all items with a11ytf?
... 62 bugs
... Some may be older

LW: We haven't gone thru all these, but have tagged the ones we wish to track.
... This will give us a complete list to work from.

BUG 13176


JOC: This realted to canvas and fallback content, I'd leave as P1

<Discussion on Priority levels

HH: This is marked as high priority so thats fine with me.

LW: Ok

BUG 13181


JOC: Thats fine

HH: I don't remember seeing this bug

LW: These have been looked at by group, combination of short and long list
... We need to just confirm the Priority level

BUG 11329


JOC: Thats fine

<hhillen> JOC: What is the default priority level for new bugs?

<hhillen> HH: I thought it was P2

<hhillen> MC: I think it's P3

<hhillen> MC: Actually, it's supposed to be P3, but it seems bugzilla is set to use P2 at the moment. This might be something we need to report to the taskforce

LW: This is important
... The Bug 11329

JOC: +1 to raising it

MC: We are a little past time line, we may not be able to just edit this or other bugs

<MichaelC> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jun/0315.html

MC: We have to explain in a comment why we want to raise it's priority

+1 to Leonie

BUG 12228


HH: Did we skip a couple 11329?

JOC: The bugs may be sorted slightly diff in the browser
... My first one is 13728

HH: The next one would be 11329

LW: We just did that one

I'll follow via IRC

<hhillen> Scribe: Hans

<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11391

<hhillen> MC: Not a high priority

<hhillen> HH: Do we need to lower it?

<hhillen> MC: No, we don't need to get involved with lowering priorities

<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11593

<hhillen> MC: Marke as P3, could be P2, but I don't know if we should worry about moving P3's to P2's, only whether they should be moved to P1

<hhillen> LW: SO we'll leave this one

<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12228

fine with me

<hhillen> LW: LEave it at P2

<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12306

<hhillen> HH: It's an editorial request

<hhillen> LW: Leave it at P3

<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12544

But the spec advises to use other HTML elements etc when they are more appropriate

<hhillen> LW: Leave it at P3

<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12544

<hhillen> Leave at P3

<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12587

<hhillen> LW: Leave at P3

<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12590

<hhillen> MC: Let's leave it as it is, changing from P3 to P2 will likely not change in how it's handled

<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12591

<hhillen> LW: Leave at P3

<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12604

<hhillen> MC: That's already a P2, so we'll leave it

<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12794

<hhillen> MC: leave it as it is

<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12885

<hhillen> MC: I think it's getting enough attention, does not need a priority change

<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13103

<hhillen> LW: we'll leave this as is

<hhillen> HH: I will divided the remaining bugs between us. Everybody has to go through their list and note the bugs that they feel need a priority change (and explain why).

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.136 (CVS log)
$Date: 2011/10/04 16:06:10 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136  of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/llist/list/
Succeeded: s/prioroty/priority/
Found Scribe: Joshue
Inferring ScribeNick: Joshue
Found Scribe: Hans
Scribes: Joshue, Hans

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.

Default Present: Joshue, Hans, Michael_Cooper, Léonie_Watson
Present: Hans_Hillen Léonie_Watson Joshu_O'Connor Michael_Cooper
Regrets: Everett_Zufelt Gez_Lemon Marco_Ranon
Got date from IRC log name: 04 Oct 2011
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/10/04-a11y-bugs-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.

WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report

[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]