See also: IRC log
<LeonieWatson> agenda: this
<Joshue> scribe: Joshue
:-)
LW: Our next task is to look at
the bugs we have tagged and see if they have the right
priority
... Hans didn't you do this?
HH: I did mention if there should be a priority change.
LW: Will we go thru some on call and then divide up rest at the end.
HH: Do we have a list
LW: Yes
HH: Goes to search for tagged bugs
<hhillen> w&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=
HH: Do you want all items with
a11ytf?
... 62 bugs
... Some may be older
LW: We haven't gone thru all
these, but have tagged the ones we wish to track.
... This will give us a complete list to work from.
BUG 13176
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13176
JOC: This realted to canvas and fallback content, I'd leave as P1
<Discussion on Priority levels
HH: This is marked as high priority so thats fine with me.
LW: Ok
BUG 13181
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13181
JOC: Thats fine
HH: I don't remember seeing this bug
LW: These have been looked at by
group, combination of short and long list
... We need to just confirm the Priority level
BUG 11329
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11329
JOC: Thats fine
<hhillen> JOC: What is the default priority level for new bugs?
<hhillen> HH: I thought it was P2
<hhillen> MC: I think it's P3
<hhillen> MC: Actually, it's supposed to be P3, but it seems bugzilla is set to use P2 at the moment. This might be something we need to report to the taskforce
LW: This is important
... The Bug 11329
JOC: +1 to raising it
MC: We are a little past time line, we may not be able to just edit this or other bugs
<MichaelC> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jun/0315.html
MC: We have to explain in a comment why we want to raise it's priority
+1 to Leonie
BUG 12228
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12228
HH: Did we skip a couple 11329?
JOC: The bugs may be sorted
slightly diff in the browser
... My first one is 13728
HH: The next one would be 11329
LW: We just did that one
I'll follow via IRC
<hhillen> Scribe: Hans
<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11391
<hhillen> MC: Not a high priority
<hhillen> HH: Do we need to lower it?
<hhillen> MC: No, we don't need to get involved with lowering priorities
<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11593
<hhillen> MC: Marke as P3, could be P2, but I don't know if we should worry about moving P3's to P2's, only whether they should be moved to P1
<hhillen> LW: SO we'll leave this one
<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12228
fine with me
<hhillen> LW: LEave it at P2
<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12306
<hhillen> HH: It's an editorial request
<hhillen> LW: Leave it at P3
<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12544
But the spec advises to use other HTML elements etc when they are more appropriate
<hhillen> LW: Leave it at P3
<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12544
<hhillen> Leave at P3
<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12587
<hhillen> LW: Leave at P3
<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12590
<hhillen> MC: Let's leave it as it is, changing from P3 to P2 will likely not change in how it's handled
<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12591
<hhillen> LW: Leave at P3
<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12604
<hhillen> MC: That's already a P2, so we'll leave it
<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12794
<hhillen> MC: leave it as it is
<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12885
<hhillen> MC: I think it's getting enough attention, does not need a priority change
<hhillen> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13103
<hhillen> LW: we'll leave this as is
<hhillen> HH: I will divided the remaining bugs between us. Everybody has to go through their list and note the bugs that they feel need a priority change (and explain why).
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136 of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/llist/list/ Succeeded: s/prioroty/priority/ Found Scribe: Joshue Inferring ScribeNick: Joshue Found Scribe: Hans Scribes: Joshue, Hans WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. Default Present: Joshue, Hans, Michael_Cooper, Léonie_Watson Present: Hans_Hillen Léonie_Watson Joshu_O'Connor Michael_Cooper Regrets: Everett_Zufelt Gez_Lemon Marco_Ranon Got date from IRC log name: 04 Oct 2011 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/10/04-a11y-bugs-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]